The Trouble with my Father's Inheritance ( The 30 Million Dollar Man ) . ( Nov 3 , 2024 )
The Trouble with my Father ' s Inheritance .
Nov 3 2024 : As mentioned elsewhere , I dd send this email ( translated by Google ) to a notary whom I still have to meet :
Subject: NOTES FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE NOTARY WHO MANAGES / DISTRIBUTE THE ESTATE OF BLANCHE VANERMEN
Dear Notary,
I appoint you as the drafter of the deed of acceptance of my mother's estate subject to inventory, which requires a fixed fee of 211 euros that in my opinion can be recovered from the estate of that estate.
I would also like to obtain the release of her bank accounts via your office, which in my opinion requires a free deed of succession.
In that context, can you tell me whether extensive bank accounts in her name in the Netherlands, were blocked?
By birth certificate January 6, 1960, I, PETER CONSTANT PIRON, am a RESERVATIVE HEIR WITH A RESERVED PORTION OF 100% with regard to my father's own goods/funds, part of which was embezzled or donated by my mother BLANCHE VANERMEN (e.g. to foster child BART BAUSMANS / PIRON, to which REDUCTION applies), and a RESERVATIVE HEIR WITH A RESERVED PORTION of at least 50% (inheritance law 2018) with regard to my mother's goods/funds, to which REDUCTION also applies if she donated larger sums to e.g. the aforementioned BART PIRON.
BART BAUSMANS (PIRON) is not a real child of my father or mother, since he is apparently a FOSTER CHILD from the BAUSMANS family and was "added" to my father in Schilde with a forged birth certificate in December 1960 (without inheritance rights).
In that inheritance context, I kindly ask you to request the copy of the birth certificate Bart Piron 21 December 1960 free of charge from the Population of Schoten and to provide me with a PDF copy of it.
The funds embezzled or wrongfully donated from my father's estate relate to the following goods and the money they yielded:
1. TURNHOUTSEBAAN 556 SCHILDE (hotel villa plus approximately 3000 m2 hotel estate, unique property of my father since notarial deeds 1957 and 1968, without inheritance rights of BLANCHE VANERMEN or BART PIRON.
The value was estimated by Realo at a meager 820,000 euros (approximately 33 million BF) and by real estate expert Henderickx in Berchem at 50 million BF (1,250,000 euros).
Apparently much more was paid in black (an average of 40 million BF, or 1 million euros) via Blanche Vanermen.
Of this, more than 10 million BF was paid to Bart via B Vanermen Piron (no heir) who took it to Zurich Switzerland. (to which a reduction applies)
Please ask there how much money he received from Blanche Vanermen and what happened to it in the meantime with the request to return my inheritance money to Belgium (BE75 6714 1055 7800 in the name of Peter Piron.)
Address Bart (resident since 2011)
BART PIRON, ROTACHSTRASSE 17, app. 23, CH 8003 ZURICH)
2. BUILDING PLOT SPECHTENDREEF HALLE, the purchase of which was partly guaranteed by my father in 1964. Here I claim 820,000 BF (20,500 euros) as embezzled inheritance rights from my father.
The building plot was sold in 1991 without my knowledge or consent by Blanche Vanermen for 2,750,000 bf.
3. An APARTMENT RUGGEVELDLAAN 730 DEURNE that was my main residence from 1982 to 1987 and that was purchased with my inheritance money from my father of which BLANCHE VANERMEN received at least 2,250,000 BF in May-June 1982,spent in September 1982 on the purchase of that property.
Here I claim 152,000 euros on the sales price of 200,000 euros in December 2019. I had previously filed my opposition with notary van Herzeele and with sales agent van Marcke against the sale because I had acquired co-ownership rights to the property through substitution/subrogation (in the sum paid).
4. According to the Registration, my grandfather Constant Piron inherited more than 1 million BF from his brother Mon (Halle-Zandhoven) in 1981. Constant actually did not spend any money, so this was part of his inheritance. He died in January 1988, and I did not receive any message from a notary. My own mother wrongly presented herself as heir, also earlier when my grandmother Alberta Verschueren died.
Can these funds ( about 12,500 euros) be recovered from her?
I AM EXPECTING AN AMICABLE SETTLEMENT FROM THE FUNDS FROM THE ESTATES OF MY FATHER (and grandfather), with calculation of REDUCTION regarding gifts of these sums to others.
As regards my mother's estate, I wish to be an heir with the benefit of inventory, stating all assets and liabilities, including a correct statement of monies still owed from the estates of my father or grandfather, as indicated above.
( Nov 2 2024 : I indicated elsewhere that I dispute BART's ancestry since he was never a son of my father or my mother , but apparently a foster child coming from BORGERHOUT underworld BAUSMANS , making him incapable to inherit from my father or mother .
Upon closer examination , also his resume seems BOGUS at several places ; TOO MUCH ARTIFICIAL "LEGEND " https://www.dhirubhai.net/in/bart-piron-3532b2/
He would be retired at 63 . He would have graduated in economics by June 1983 , but there was no graduation ceremony . He would work at IPPA ANTWERP by AUGUST 1983 ( pretty fast after graduation .. ) but I recall that HUGO PATROONS tried to get him into IPPA by 1984 at the earliest , and that he principally could not get in given his criminal record since 1975 .
He would have moved to the Netherlands by June 1987 , but he was certainly still in Antwerp through DECEMBER 1987 - JANUARY 1988 ( and did not reside in the NETHERLANDS ) .
Between AUG 2009 and JULY 2011 he would reside in SIGNAPORE and I wonder why he ever did so .
Only by AUG 2011 he resides in Switzerland : BART PIRON , ROTACHSTRASSE 17 , app. 23 , CH 8003 ZURICH .
His resume contains some patent falsehoods , and I do not know who guided him in his ODD CAREER . )
( July 1 ,2022 : The Jewish/Jesuit drug dealers are still destructive "TOD/sexual injury " , and may comprise of BART PIRON , ( ILSE ) KROLS , (HERMAN) VANERMEN , ( KRIS/HUGO ) PATROONS , ILSE VERBERGT ( see below ) , GUY STOFFELEN , DIRK VAN HECKE ; DIRK NOLF ( see elsewhere ) and DIETER VAN LOOVEREN , depicted here . That "organization " was in the making at the latest in 1975 , when I was an INTERN , residing constantly at a school in WESTMALLE ( 1974-1977 ; see my resume ) , while working on Saturdays at my rich marriage in BRASSCHAAT . I was and am not involved in drug abuse or the destructive drug trade . How /where the destructive organization was set up is unclear to me , since I was really constantly residing at the school in WESTMALLE , from 1974 thru 1977 . )
( July 2 , 2022 : I am waiting now for 4 hours , going into TOD once again , on a Dutch official " Health and Beauty " shipment delivered by POSTNL , recently in Belgium accused of serious infractions ; I advised the Dutch companies to seek another delivery agent than POSTNL . )
( July 3 , 2022 : Time and again , a crazy bandit organization ( Jewish-Jesuit ) does me intentional harm . I did not do anything with those bandits , whom I cannot tolerate . As I explained above , prior to coming to University Antwerp , which was run partly by some Jesuit crooks ( VAN NESTE - PEETERS ) at UFSIA , I resided quietly and decently in Westmalle , going to marry some British - Dutch females from Brasschaat . Problem was and is that the crooked Jesuits had allowed a bunch of crooks at UFSIA . Exactly those cons , who in fact never succeeded intellectually at the university , cannot do me harm all the time . The "Russian Jewish BORGERHOUT family " ( criminal ; VANERMEN - PATROONS - KROLS - MEEUS ) can and could not do me harm via "their " criminals . I was decently doing university LAW SCHOOL , as off age 17 , SUCCESSFULLY . All the bandits doing me intentional harm were bandits then and now , still doing me INTENTIONAL CRIMINAL DAMAGE and ABUSE . ( inter alia : MAURICE NAETS ( Chech - Russian ) ; MARLEEN BENIEST ; AN COLLIN , list to be completed .
The corrupt family was obsessed to set me up with a low-level , handicapped "Jewish/ Russian worker " female ; but such was never a fit , since I come from a rich entrepreneurial western family ; my father and grandfather were never "workers " or " farmers " , who are in fact low-level and do me intentional , damaging harm . I must be capable to be together with my rich Dutch-British capable , entrepreneurial , athletic , intelligent females , since those are my real level . The destructive low-level operations have to be stopped .
I THINK THAT THERE WAS AN ONGOING ABUSIVE EAST-GERMAN JEWISH RUSSIAN STASI ELEMENT (PUTIN) INVOLVED IN SETTING UP THE BORGERHOUT DRUG DEALER ABUSE SET UP BY 1976 AT THE LATEST .) .
( June 1 , 2022 : A new problem erupted , in that my western Dutch-British females are raped again , followed by brutal wet/pore abuse ( done apparently by drug dealers ) and TOD. Those criminal activities appear to be the VERBERGT family ( EKEREN - SCHILDE ) . I met an ILSE VERBERGT for 3 minutes in the aula where the second year of Law School took place in Antwerp , but was never interested to have a relationship with her . ILSE VERBERGT ( Hoogpadlaan 98 , 2180 Ekeren , who apparently would have an abode in or near KNOKKE ) , did stalk me as wet/pore in the Netherlands and in Antwerp quite recently . She could be family of a certain KOEN(RAAD) VERBERGT ( born 1973) , who happens to be my present landlord . KOENRAAD VERBERGT , who moved to SCHOOLSTRAAT 43 , SCHILDE ( that is 5 doors from KRIS PATROONS , SCHOOLSTRAAT 63 , SCHILDE ) , in 2018 would have lived at "SNIEDERSPAD 3A-B , SCHILDE " ( see this annotation ) . As far as I know , nobody could ever live , build or have a residence at that location .
( June 3 , 2022 : 3A-B is a "protected Flemish property " ( since 1981 ) , the " HOEVE SPREEUWENBORG " , where nobody can live and nobody can have a business . ( It was also "used" by a company named "CONTENT IT " from 2008 till 2011 ) )
The "hoax" 3 A-B is done by notary ANNE CARTUYVELS , notary successor to notary HERMAN DESSERS , notary till 2012 , who co-founded "ICT FIELD SERVICES" ( VERBERGT - VERVROEGEN ) by 2003-2004 . This as an emanation of "WILD CATS CONSULTING BVBA " by KOEN VERBERGT via the same DESSERS in 2001 . )
While " enjoying a break" nowadays , he was involved , at least in 2016 but far earlier , with one CHRISTOPHE VERVROEGEN ( also born 1973 ), shown in this image ( who has no LinkedIn page ) .
https://www.jfs.be/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/foto-768x260.jpg
https://development.solutions30.be/janssens-field-services-sluit-aan-bij-solutions-30/
That landlord ( see annotation above ) now wants the indexation of the rent , which would cost a 160 Euro on top of the usual rent , which is why I asked them , by email and letter , to keep everything as it was .
All those rapes and other abuse has to stop . I will update this essay quite soon to prove a continuing crime ( translation of " voortgezet misdrijf " in Belgian criminal /penal law . )
( June 2 , 2022 : There is a second remark as to "BART PIRON " . By 1976 , he was thrown out of school in Westmalle because of a crime . Apparently , he became a drugs dealer in Deurne - Borgerhout - Antwerp , which involved some Jewish and possibly Jesuit drug dealers, while , by 1982 , it was clear he knew SONJA BAUSMANS (Deurne , born 1957 ) , who , in 1982 ( first time when I met her - July 20 , 1982 ) , was the ex-wife of BRUNO BROKKEN ( born 1953 ) , who were both claimed to be drug dealers . By 1976 , I was in Brasschaat , preparing my marriage with "drugs-clean Dutch - British affluent females" . Afterwards , it becomes clear that some Spanish - Irish Jesuits are involved in the Colombia cocaine drug trade , which , in Antwerp - Borgerhout , is distributed by Moroccans who bribe the Borgerhout-Antwerp police with about 500 Euros a head , according to an undercover VRT ( Flemish official television ) report by Stef Meerbergen 2017 . The ugly French /Moroccan/Afghani drug dealers who stalk me to do harm , have something to do with the BART PIRON drugs dealer activities since at least 1976 ( when he was thrown out of the Westmalle School . ))
( June 3 , 2022 : Strange event in the same context : in my street mailbox came an invoice for a company named " MOBILE CAR ASSISTANCE BVBA " , which is most likely the company people ( at times harassment just like Afghan neighbor IRFANDULLAH ) who occupy the ground floor as a "auto mechanic garage " . The company was founded in 2003 via notary ROCHTUS by a Moroccan named RACHID LAHSSINI , born 1974 Morocco , at that time living in Deurne , later ( 2011 ) joined by his family ABDELMALEK , for about 1 year . In Januari 2022 , several others joined the company , being BRAHIM GALLOUCHE , NAJIM GALLOUCHE , and one MOHAMED BOUHAMZOU .
The GALLOUCHE family did found a company in 2007 at drugs dealer street LANGE LOBROEK 2060 ANTWERP via notary HANS DE DECKER (BRASSCHAAT !! ) named N.B.M. BVBA . In 2013 , the company was joined by ABDESLAM AMAJOUD who would still be active . The plethora of odd individual moves here . Very strange bunch , all technically located at another administrative address , now doing " business " from very close by . )
My Father did die in September 1973 , barely 44 years young . It was a "suspect death " , which standardwise required a forensic examination . Which was not done .
I am the only legal son of my father ( see image above) - I have a brother BART who is but an unqualified " natural child" (The document shows the name JOANNES as the second name of my Father ; that is the Dutch first name of the grandfather of my father and the name of the father of my grandfather (The Flemish writing of the name happens to be JOHANNES , with an H ) ; just like CONSTANT , my second name , is the name of my grandfather , who also lived in Schilde , Antwerp region , Belgium , and who founded the property by about 1920 ) .
Thus under the prevalent law of 1973 , I inherit everything from my Father ( my mother VANERMEN technically , under said 1973 law , did and does not have inheritance rights ) . Which did not happen yet . Me obtaining my Father's Inheritance has been willfully obstructed for the last 45 years .
What follows is how my mother and brother ( who could not inherit due to my Father , who gave the entire inheritance to me by Christmas 1970 , excluding BART ) stole the Inheritance of my Father , in violation of every applicable Belgian Law ( civil law , comparable to the present system applicable in the State of Louisiana ) .
( Nov 2 , 2019 : At present , BART PIRON appears to be a Russian "orphan " who has a real father and mother in Russia , dropped off via BORGERHOUT ( PATROONS , VANERMEN , KROLS ) by Christmas 1960 , being a " natural , unrecognized , non-legal child , in fact not genetically related to my legal father or mother , and therefore not qualified to inherit from either my father or my mother .
July 18 , 2020 : A Russian concept to steal the SCHILDE hotel property and especially all the good money involved could be the concept "PHILIPPE " :
(August 2020 : there is a lot more odd news about this PHILIPPE VLERICK ; via one SIGRID MULLER , who apparently still resides in SCHILDE , VLERICK gets involved via DE FERM with one URI MAEMON , Israeli , from at least 2004 till 2010 , who runs a Swiss company named AUTO 3P EUROPE headquartered in BAER since 2000 , with nothing but Israeli and Romanian employees . DE KEYSER NV was only formed , according to notary DE FERM - You should read this carefully - in 1979 by one notary ERIC VAN HAUWERMEIREN in Antwerp - NOTARY ERIC VANHAUWERMEIREN in Antwerp has NEVER EXISTED - ( while VLERICK was in my property since 1977 ( commercial lease )) ; changed by notary DE FERM MERKSEM in 1995 ; reduced to a BVBA ( a very unusual move ) by notary VAN DEN ABBEELE in 2014 .
This Israeli URI MAEMON actually resembles the PVV-VLD politician BART TOMMELEIN .
DE FERM lies about the formation of DE KEYSER NV in 1979 ; by claiming the formation in 1979 he suggests that VLERICK/ DE KEYSER would have been OWNERS at that time while just commercial renters , in a very precarious state .
As such , on my property , they committed ownership fraud , and , via DE FERM , banking fraud in having arranged 16 million mortgage credit till 2000 only , via the GENERALE BANK , on my property sold by DE FERM for a mere 2 million BF . The assessment which I did obtain depicted hereby , states that the SCHILDE part of my property is worth at least 32 million BF , while the part HALLE , as accessory property ( not mentioned in the assesment ) could easily be worth at least 16 million BF .
Turnhoutsebaan 556, 2970 Schilde
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Realo <[email protected]>
To: P [email protected] PIRON <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020, 5:00:46 PM GMT+2
Subject: Schattingsrapport voor Turnhoutsebaan 556, 2970 Schilde
??Het schattingsrapport voor Turnhoutsebaan 556, 2970 Schilde is nu beschikbaar???€?814.000 Schatting voor verhuur: €?2.450/maand?Meer details over hoe deze Realo schatting berekend is, vindt u in het verslag.????
Kenmerken
Here a recent picture of PHILIPPE VLERICK , whom I do not recognize at all from the 18 year old I met at the property in 1978 :
Before 1997 he is also CEO of ZONNEDAUWBOS NV , via which he now appears to pass on to his daughter JULIE VLERICK shares of the different DE KEYSER BVBAs.)
By May 2018 , and again now July 5 , 2018 , there is the solid suggestion , due to rampant non-western wet /pore and "TOD/death" abuse ( infiltration of the Antwerp police , stretching all the way to Chech ( Belgian ) "Liberal " ( PVV- VLD ) Minister of Justice con MARC VERWILGHEN , born in DENDERMONDE , just like GUY VERHOFSTADT , who "belong" to con nobility WILLY DE CLERCK , Ghent , for certain involved in criminal obstruction of justice - art. 258 Belgian criminal code , and counterfeit money ) , that RECYCLED DRUGS DEAL MONEY would have been involved , which obviously moves via some corrupt notaries (as BEUCKELAERS , notaries in Berchem SINCE 1943 - see further ) . Oddly , DE FERM ( who lives in Brasschaat ) now has an accountant in Hamme/Lokeren near GENT ( OOST - VLAANDEREN ) - far far away from Antwerp / Brasschaat , the area where also "black money buyer " VLERICK - DE KEYSER ( canal Ghent ) comes from . Here are the present accountant's references :
LOUFS Eddy / ATERNIO
Accountant-Belastingconsulent , Zwaarveld 41/D , 9220 Hamme , BELGI? .
"Our roots go right back to the 1960s, with Manu Lemmens ."
Someone suggests that , in the theft of the inheritance of my Father and Grandfather , there would also be a tangential role of PETER MEEUS (also PVV - VLD ) , son of a Bulgarian bar manager , who , possibly together with HUGO PATROONS , stole goods belonging to my Grandfather , most likely in the Spring of 1974 .( MEEUS finished Law School in Antwerp , in 1984 at the earliest , to become eventually active on the staff of ANDRIES KINSBERGEN ( also PVV - VLD ) , and to become active in the (international ) diamond business as off 1992 , first in Antwerp , subsequently in Dubai , now in "synthetic diamonds " ( see Russian ALROSA ) . By 1994 , when I questioned him in Antwerp , MEEUS ( who told that "his " diamond business was vengeant on myself - without obvious reason ) claimed falsely to be related to OCTAVIE PIRON , the younger sister of my Grandfather ( born 1890 ) , which obviously gave him and his father MEEUS no right to steal goods from my Grandfather . )
Funds (supposedly drug deals money ) from VLERICK - DE KEYZER must have been "recycled " via DE FERM and the GENERALE BANK BRUSSELS ; it is essential to figure out how and how much .
( August 7 , 2020 : I wonder now whether there is any relation with HERMAN VANERMEN , born Borgerhout 1957 , married to a Ghent woman FRANCINE BASSIER ( living LAARNE nearby Ghent ) , who apparently had something to do with UCO GHENT , related to notary HERMAN VERSCHRAEGEN ( Loenhout , Wuustwezel ) , who was convicted in Belgium only for about 5 times ( once in his Youth in Borgerhout apparently ) , accused of being a terrorist CCC decoy by 1985 ( BERTRAND SASSOYE ) , convicted for embezzeling money at the Generale Maatschappij Brussels , who afterwards ( because he was blacklisted for paid jobs ) was allowed to take over an AUTOPARTS company , apparently STRUCTOPLAS ( where his name was spelled HERMAN VAN ERMEN ) specializing in PLASTIC INJECTION MOULDING , inter alia for OPEL (GM ) CARS , doing exhibitions, for example in 1994 , as the strange Rumanian Israeli SIGRID MULLER - URI MAEMON nexus ( which visibly popped up 10 years later at VLERICK , by 2004 )
HERMAN VANERMEN ′s companies went broke in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis , which also struck GM-OPEL . )
Two important relevant legal maneuvers had to performed when my Father died , normally within a period of 4 months since September 1973 :
* My mother was appointed Legal Guardian ( with a Supervising Guardian overseeing solely herself ( not me ) , who became HUGO PATROONS ) ; had to appoint a notary to make an inventory of all relevant inheritance goods , to be submitted to the local Succession Tax Authority (Federal ) . That became FRANS POELEMANS , Schilde . Most of time , in collusion between the declarant and the notary , inheritance values are kept as low as possible , to keep the Succession Tax as low as possible .That was not to my benefit , since it artificially lowered my inheritance value . Advantage is that the Tax Authority is bound by what it accepted to be a just Succession Tax . Any inheritance money coming to me now is tax-free .
* A Family Council had to be convoked by the local Justice of Peace (located - but I did not know that - in Zandhoven ), to take first legal measures as to Guardianship and Inheritance . That Family Council , which was supposed to reconvene regularly in the 7 years of Guardianship since 1974 , oddly only convened ( without me knowing anything - in fact I had to convoked to be present ) on a Wednesday morning in April 1974 , when I was at school . Unfortunately , there was no party representing my Father ; all parties were on the side of my mother . Nevertheless the Judge , a Jurist , did apply the law correctly by calling me inheritant , by imposing a legal mortgage till end 1982 on part of the inheritance good ( the property of my Father ) , to prevent it being sold before the end of 1982 , and imposed that all money incoming on that property beyond 2000 Belgian Francs had to be versed into a blocked bank account , which as far as I know was never opened . ( I could only read that 1974 decision by 2002 ) .
Then my mother and the entire "Family" hastily started to sell off the entire content of my Father's property , which was a hotel and living abode with 10 sleeping rooms , all modern comfort ( including first domotics , since 1971 ) and about 3600 square meters of well -maintained soil , domiciled SCHILDE , at that time the richest community of Belgium. When inquiring later about the proceeds achieved in 1974 , which legally had to be versed in a blocked bank account , I was told by my mother that she had not kept any records .
Next , the "Family " , ignoring that doing so required a new Family Council meeting and the approval of said Justice of Peace , buried the property under two commercial leases , thereby of course "forgetting " to register those leases , so that I could never figure out how much money above 2000 Belgian Francs ( a realistic amount was 140000 Belgian Francs a month - 3500 euros ) came in monthly on the property .
By 1978 , being in the second year of Law School , I did ask my mother to see all documents ( from proof of property , to (2) commercial rent agreements ) on the Schilde property ; she said : " We manage the property in Your best interest , under supervision of the Judge of Peace ." Weeks later , in a show , she pretended that such Family Council under supervision of said Judge , effectively took place . In reality , no Family Council ever took place after 1974 .
By February 1982 ( when my natural but not legal brother was also 21 ) , officially those commercial rent proceeds over about 7 years ( 1974-1981 ) were distributed in 3 parts ( me , natural brother , mother ) , 3 times 1,266 million Belgian Francs . ( When I recalculated the rent proceeds over 7 years , I already came two million short , which were apparently creamed off those proceeds ) .
I was in 1982 in Leuven studying my last year of Law School , developing the habit of staying there in the weekend , to prepare for the last exams ( June 1982 ) , which had to be a breeze . There was a "heavy " commercial lease ( since 1978 - those agreements officially take as many as 27 years , or even longer .... ) on the Schilde property , thus I did not have to look back .
By 2002 , after years of searching ( and years abroad ) what the status of the Schilde property was , I was informed by a notary (BEUCKELAERS , Berchem ) , that the Schilde property , without my approval /signature of myself , had been sold in a notary Act of June 16 , 1982 ( me doing my last exams in Leuven ) , for 2,25 million Belgian Francs , while the real value was about 40 to 60 million Belgian Francs . A completely fraudulent ( and thus totally null and void ) notary Act had been made by head notary DE FERM ( Merksem ) assisted by POELEMANS (Schilde ) and COPPENS (Vosselaar) . (A notary in Belgium is an official appointed by the Minister of Justice ( AG ) , who has private presentation and public enforcement tasks , especially in real estate sales and inheritances ). Since my signature ( as real owner , of majority age ) is not on said "Act " , the Act is null and void ( art . 1599 civil code ) . Given that it was real estate transfered , not art 2279 is applicable , but rather art . 2267 and 2258 civil code .
Art. 2267 . Een titel die nietig is uit hoofde van een gebrek in de vorm, kan niet als grondslag dienen voor een tienjarige en twintigjarige verjaring.
and : Art . 2258 BW : " De verjaring loopt niet tegen de erfgenaam onder voorrecht van boedelbeschrijving ... " (?appellant is "erfgenaam onder voorrecht van boedelbeschrijving" ) .
BEUCKELAERS , who knew that no cent from the June 16 , 1982 Notary Act had ever been paid to me , did relatively little effort to retrieve any money from my mother . That can have something to do with the conflict of interest that Notary DE FERM , who managed to create 14 million Belgian Francs in mortgage loans ( with the GENERALE BANK Brussels , and successors as Paris - based BNP -PARIBAS ) on his notary Act of 2,25 million BF ( which is thus mathematically impossible ) , for the "buyer " VLERICK- DE KEYZER from GHENT , "gave " the last mortgage renewal at specifically that time when I inquired in 2002, to BEUCKELAERS in Berchem ( giving him fees ).
All that "manipulation " suggested that an enormous sum of "black money " , larger than 40 to 60 million BF ( 1 to 1.5 million euro ) , had been paid by VLERICK -DE KEYZER , from Ghent , via DE FERM , to my mother (and brother , who keeps the money in supposedly a numbered account in Switzerland , Zurich ) . BEUCKELAERS sneered that I would not be capable to refind that money .
As a matter of fact , POELEMANS , the notary who co-signed the 1982 null and void Act , which I did not sign ( not a party to it ) and DE FERM , failed miserably in their "information duties " as to myself , real heir / owner . Someone wrote a thesis about those duties , whereby the responsibility as to third parties ( I did not sign ) is deemed criminal , and the information duty as to "parties " ( I was in fact no "party " ) is in the torts realm ( but too many torts can constitute a crime ) .
POELEMANS only did send me relevant documents in 2002-2003 , not at the only relevant time , in 1982 .
My mother went on to buy an appartment in Deurne ( where she already resided ) in September 1982 , for about the official amount of money officially received on June 16 , 1982 ( fraudulent Act DE FERM ).
By 1985 , my natural brother , who was and is not entitled to inherit , but who up till then still lived with my mother ( I moved elsewhere by 1983 , after just a few months in my mother's new appartment ) , BART , went to ZURICH , Switzerland " to buy some BALLY shoes" , which are equally available on the MEIR , Antwerp ( the most expensive shopping street of Belgium ).
He now lives as BART PIRON , ROTACHSTRASSE 17 , app. 23 , CH 8003 ZURICH .
Most likely , he opened a numbered bank account in ZURICH ( I suppose at CREDIT SUISSE , but such could also be tainted UBS ) , which , even at time , was not possible under 10 million Belgian Francs ( he must at least have deposited 20 million BF) .
A man in the US by 1991 , one JOHN BAHRET in INDIANAPOLIS , INDIANA , suggested that I had to retrieve my inheritance money from my brother's numbered account in Zurich . But I had no access to it . BART simply refuses to send just anything into my Belgian bank account .
I try to figure out (and I invite You politely to join this Herculean POIROT detective task ) how my brother BART did end up intentionally in ZURICH some 8 years ago ( in August 2011 ) to sit as a duck on my inheritance money ( which he still refuses to send through ) . It seems that one would have to work as a malignant broker at DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT out of Pennsylvania or NY , to "orchestrate " his career intentionally ending up in Zurich , given the odd orchestrated "take-overs " which litter his "career " . As off Dec 1992 , BART oddly works at ORACLE NETHERLANDS (owner Jewish Russian LARRY ELLISON ) . Then , in 1995 , he moves to MISYS , a company formed by one LOMAX in 1979 . By 2005 , MISYS is virtually taken over by one MIKE LAWRIE , who worked 27 years at IBM , and who , prior to coming to MISYS , apparently via a San Francisco private investment firm named VALUEACT CAPITAL , passed on Californian SIEBEL SYSTEMS to LARRY ELLISON .
VALUEACT CAPITAL was formed in 2000 by a former Director of MISYS , named JEFFREY UBBEN.
IBM also took over ALGORITHMICS in Oct 2011, a company where BART worked from 2001 till July 2011 before moving to ZURICH . 7 years and nine months in the UK ( where one also started ALGORITHMICS DUBAI by 2008 (ran till 2016 ) ) , and an odd 2 years at ALGORITHMICS SIGNAPORE . ALGORITHMICS is a Canadian company formed in 1989 with a UK dependency since 1995 , apparently managed by a Canadian lawyer ( most likely recruiting Bart by Nov 2001) , named Michael Peter Cox SPRAGGE .
By 2005 , ALGORITHMICS was apparently taken over by FITCH// FIMALAC PARIS , which did not affect Bart's employment ( He would earn every time at a take-over if he owns shares ....)
In January 2005, Algorithmics was acquired by Fitch Group for $175 million, which is also the parent company of Fitch Ratings .[2]
( Update March 28 , 2019 ) FIMALAC PARIS took over FITCH by 1997 . HEARST NY started to build up equity in FITCH since 2006 , adding as much as 30 % from FIMALAC in 2014 and the remaining 20 % from the same FIMALAC in 2018 . FITCH was fined 1,6 million Euros by the ESMA ( EUROPEAN SECURITIES AND MARKETS AUTHORITY ) in 2016 , and again more than 5 million Euros in 2019 , apparently due to the conflict of interest created by the lower - mentioned MARC LADREIT DE LACCHARRIERE .
In 2005 , FITCH was owned by Paris-based FIMALAC , owned by one Marc Ladreit de Lacharrière , which smells surprisingly like the French state , be it probably via a Jewish ( NY -Paris ) vehicle as LAZARD (FRERES ) . ( speculation )
BART did stay on at ALGORITHMICS , in 2005 .
Remark that IBM took over ALGORITHMICS in 2011 for more than double as to what FIMALAC paid 6 years before ( 2005 ) , and that SUNGARD ( which pops up as Zurich since 2011 ) and FIS , which pops up further in 2015 , are considered the same direct competitors of ALGORITHMICS / IBM .
Then ( July 2011 ) moving to Zurich ( where his "adventure" HAD to end ) to work at SUNGARD , which is a Pennsylvania company oddly run by a Jewish orchestra team composed of one STERN with Chech Israeli Jews DVORAK . SUNGARD in turn was refinanced by FIS PA/Florida in 2015 , and BART is staying at work in Zurich . ( Oftentimes these take-overs are financed by stock swaps , which means that the ones taken over get a significant say in the "new boss " . ) According to HOOVERS ( DUNN and BRADSTREET ) , SUNGARD and FIS are the same company oddly again headquartered in Pennsylvania .
I find some "insider trade suggestions " , based on the "old story " of Jewish ( Russian ) DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT " alumni " SIEGEL ( a rabbi NY and known Jewish mafia name close to MEYER LANSKY ) , BOESKY ( whose parents came from Russia in 1910 ) , LEVINE and MILKEN . Via those , a very special nexus started between Pennsylvania ( too often in these stories ) /Texas and California , be it via NY . One case in point is "insider trading " involving DIAMOND SHAMROCK , originally from Pennsylvania , later Texas , and it's not so Tender Offer for NATOMAS , San Francisco , California , which it acquired by 1983-1984 . (Originally , insider trade profits were dealt with in Paris and Swiss banks in Switzerland , but eventually LEVINE/ MR. DIAMOND , in 1980 , found his way via Swiss banks in the Bahamas .)
( Update March 28 , 2019 ) Speculation remark : also Jewish STEPHEN SCHWARZMAN , from BLACKSTONE , who is also Advisor to the Russian state′s RUSSIAN DIRECT INVESTMENT FUND since 2011 , comes from Pennsylvania ; a specialization in "mergers and acquisitions " can also be "insider trading " ... . (End update March 28 , 2019 )
In 2005, Blackstone was one of seven private equity firms involved in the buyout of SunGard in a transaction valued at $11.3 billion .
The deal was initiated by SILVER LAKE PARTNERS ( 1999) , made up inter alia of one DAVID ROUX , who was Executive Vice President of ORACLE CORPORATION and especially GLENN HUTCHINS , who did join BILL CLINTON in 1992 , in 1994 moved to BLACKSTONE , from where he could already oversee SUNGARD , which he continued to do at SILVER LAKE since 1999.
How do JEFFREY UBBEN and MIKE LAWRIE ( MISYS ) get together at VALUEACT CAPITAL in 2005 in San Franscisco to virtually take over MYSIS by 2005 ( LAWRIE invested 500000 ￡ ), push ALGORITHMICS in the hands of FITCH/ FIMALAC PARIS (2005 ) and then IBM ( 2011 ) - which is located in Armonk , NY - , jumble with SUNGARD and FIS Pennsylvania and "give " SIEBEL SYSTEMS California to LARRY ELLISON in 2005 ?
ORACLE acquired SIEBEL for 5.6 billion USD in 2006 . ( due to MIKE LAWRIE ) .
The core of that Jewish Russian "scenario " exercise , sometimes "delegated " to some in Paris or San Francisco , seems some in NY-PA ( for example the take - overs of two companies where BART worked - MISYS and ALGORITHMICS - by IBM Armonk NY ( period of 15 years ) which yields a lot of money for those who organize it .)
Given the papers he wrote at SUNGARD ( beyond 2012 ) , BART became a specialist in a very special financial animal , named the credit default swap ( which is a financial instrument since the 1990's ) . As stated elsewhere , it was (ab-) used by JOHN PAULSON to bet against FANNIE MAE and FREDDIE MAC , two US Federal Government institutions , in 2007- 2008 .
Subsequently , as off 2008 , he was apparently involved in "merger arbitrage " , which implies "betting against an acquirer " :
But what really matters is :
领英推荐
I calculate that my father's inheritance is at least 30 million Euros ( coming solely to me ) at this time , and BART has to pay those in order to avoid criminal prosecution , not because of tax fraud , but because of theft of my inheritance money .
Odd is the unwillingness ( obstruction ) of Antwerp prosecutors ( whom I contacted as off 2002 , also as to NOTARY FRAUD by , inter alia , DE FERM ( Merksem ) , POELEMANS ( Schilde ) , BEUCKELAERS ( Berchem ) and one COPPENS , Vosselaar near Turnhout ) , to bite into the inheritance case to assure that I retrieve at least 30 million Euros in legitimate inheritance money .
In other cases , prosecutors go out of their way : two brothers LEYTS , one being BAREND , spokeman for Belgian Prime Minister CHARLES MICHEL, stole 74000 euros of a deceased in 2004 by opening an account in Luxembourg . The justified "inheritants " did submit criminal complaint for perjury and counterfeit documents with "civil damages " by 2010 (BRUGGE ) . Prosecutors managed to organize a "rogatory commission " to Luxembourg . Both brothers got convicted in first instance by October 25 , 2017 , also to repay the justified inheritants .
Why would Antwerp prosecutors not gather evidence in Switzerland via the same " rogatory commission " , and start the retrieval in a criminal procedure , especially involving BART ?
One also awaits the final result in the criminal procedure in the case against NOTARY VREVEN ( ST TRUIDEN ) , which is a criminal case about NOTARY FRAUD in several inheritances , in HASSELT and ANTWERP . More than one notary commits fraud on a regular basis .
I just remarked another odd old case : PATRICIA JACOBS ( who was present in my first year of Law School in Antwerp , but who did not belong there , being officially but 16 ) , got convicted in 2005 in Antwerp for having stolen , with her parents , at least 125000 euro value papers (stocks ) from the inheritance of PIERRE VANDERMEERSCH , where she was playing "nurse " to a known cancer patient who did die relatively fast .
Why is there no criminal procedure ( rogatory commission ) in the theft of the inheritance of my father ( 30 million euros - I have not been capable to manage my money for more than 35 years , and it yields interest ) , against BART (and the NOTARIES involved ) ?
Moreover , Belgian prosecutors also have to interrogate PHILIPPE VLERICK , born 1960 , now living in the SCHILDE property ( Turnhoutsebaan 556 , Schilde ) which I legitimately consider my property on which commercial lease money has to be paid by VLERICK , since 1982 , since he knows the details as to how much money was really paid , from whom ( his parents ) to whom ( DE FERM , VANERMEN , BART PIRON , eventually the name PATROONS , who had no mandate to "intervene " ) .No money was yet paid to me ......
A few remarks as to the SCHILDE PROPERTY . REALO is not completely accurate ; the property next to Turnhoutsebaan 556 ( Kapelsesteenweg , Zoersel ) was bought by my father in 1957 ( before he ever married B. VANERMEN ) per notary Act , and added to Turnhousebaan 556 , of which he became the sole owner in a Notary Act by the same POELEMANS in 1968 . ( KRIS PATROONS and his crooked Antwerp attorney colleagues DE SMEDT or ANN COLLIN , office "PALACODES" , falsely pretend that those 1957 or 1968 Notary Acts do not exist ) . In the 1968 POELEMANS Notary Act , an eternal right of domicile was preserved for my grandfather ( CONSTANT PIRON - see above ) and his wife ( my grandmother ) who founded the property by 1920 . It was criminal to chase those people out of their own property , which was "effectuated " by B. VANERMEN and HUGO PATROONS by 1974 . It was their intent already then to steal the property and the inheritance to my detriment .
The SCHILDE property was the sole property of my father , who was officially married in a marriage contract named "separation of goods " ( by which own goods by parties are kept out of any marriage ) . I am the sole heir of the personal property of my Father . It is possible that the fraudsters claim ( behind the curtains ) that I would not be the legal son of my Father . The Birth Certificate displayed above proves exactly the opposite : I am the sole heir .....
Possibly the same fraudsters maintain ( also behind the curtains ) that my own Mother would have inheritance rights based on a law change in Belgium by 1979 -1980 known as "inheritance rights of the surviving spouse on the own goods of the deceased" .
But in 1973 ( the only applicable law ) , those inheritance rights did not exist ....
It appears that my inheritance money can only be retrieved in a criminal procedure intitated in Antwerp , also asking for assistance of the Swiss Federal Authorities to retrieve the majority of my legal money ( at least 30 million euros ) from BART PIRON , since 2011 residing in ZURICH ..... The correctional court decision has to include that the June 16 , 1982 Notary Act ( DE FERM / POELEMANS ) and any previous "agreement " with the same content is considered absolutely null and void when it appeared .
Also convicting at least notary offices DE FERM and POELEMANS , in solidum , to the payment of those 30 million + Euros , since the money ( prior to June 16 , 1982 at least 30 million BF , be it in smaller installments) , must have been paid by VLERICK - DE KEYSER nominally to B VANERMEN , embezzlement via the "Third Party Account " of notary office DE FERM to the "Third Part Account of notary office POELEMANS .
( Updt April 22 , 2019 : criminal complaint with case number )
Vanwege : Peter C PIRON
2060 Antwerpen
Tav de dienstdoende Prokureur des Konings
9 februari 2011
STRAFKLACHT tegen Meester De Smet en B VANERMEN wegens meineed in civiele zaken ( art .220 Swb ) inzake AR 10/6032/A ( zie bijlage ) , vraag om heropening van het onderzoek met verzoek om een strafrechtbanksbeslissing inzake parketnummer 45.99.93/05 van 24 januari 2005 ( SABIN BAUMAN - zie bijlage ) , en strafklacht , voor zover als nodig , wegens rechtsweigering en ambtsweigeringtegen de huidige rechters in dezelfde zaak AR 10/6032/A .
Deze strafzaak wordt ook integraal onderdeel van AR 10/6032/A .
1. STRAFKLACHT tegen Meester De Smet en B VANERMEN wegens meineed in civiele zaken ( art .220 Swb ) inzake AR 10/6032/A ( zie bijlage ) en voorgaanden .
Ik ontving omstreeks 2 februari 2011 de conclusie in bijlage van Meester De Smet , die bol staat van opzettelijke leugens en opzettelijke nonsens , zodat ik wel moet vragen dat een strafrechtsprocedure wordt opgestart wegens meineed in civiele zaken .
Ik overloop de conclusie vanaf pagina 2 , en geef de leugens letterlijk weer .
A. Verjaring .?
( Pagina 2 ) " tijdens zijn minderjarigheid van 16 juni 1982 "
(5 regels verder ) : " de heer PIRON geboren is op 4 januari 1960 " .
De Smet WEET aldus dat ik op 16 juni 1982 MEERDERJARIG was ( 21 sinds 4 januari 1981 ) , en liegt dus bewust om de rechtbank voor de gek te houden op basis van het aangehaalde en totaal irrelevante art. 419 BW dat over MINDERJARIGEN gaat .
B. "Verder "
( pagina 2 ) "Er is nooit sprake geweest van betichting van valsheid van geschrifte dan vanaf de ingestelde procedures " .
Er werd in 2005 strafklacht ( inbeschuldiging ) neergelegd wegens valsheid in geschrifte ( zie bijlage ) . Ik heb slechts weet van de gewraakte verkoopakte sinds 2002 toen ik mijn kopie kreeg van notaris BEUCKELAERS ( Berchem ) .
Het nieuwe civiele verjaringsrecht ( 1998 ) schrijft voor dat de civiele verjaringstermijn slechts begint te lopen wanneer de gelaedeerde kennis heeft gekregen van de schadetoebrengende feiten .
De vordering is niet verjaard , aangezien tijdig strafklacht werd neergelegd (binnen de drie jaar ) , en bovendien de valsheid werd ingeroepen in procedures sinds 2002 , die , alhoewel voor de "verkeerde rechter " ingediend ( art . 2246 BW ) , steeds de verjaring hebben gestuit .
( pagina 4 )
"Concluante heeft hiervan ( strafklacht 45.99.93/05 ) geen weet , en werd volgens , zij nog weet , hierover nooit ondervraagd "
De Smet beweerde mondeling op rechtsdag , in de vorige procedure voor Kamer 6B , geen weet te hebben van die strafrechtsprocedure " . Zulks werd?door haarzelf mondeling gezegd op de rechtsdagzitting van 20 april 2009 in zaak 07/3631/A , en vervolgens werd dezelfde strafklacht opnieuw in het dossier ( een tweede maal ) neergelegd bij het " verzoekschrift op basis van art 772?Ger Wb ", dat kort nadien tijdens het beraad werd neergelegd ; zij kreeg in die procedure 07/3631 de kopie strafklacht eerder in haar bus als relevant stuk?)
De?strafklacht van 2005 werd dus tweemaal??in het dossier neergelegd?, en aan tegenpartij bezorgd .?. Nu opnieuw schriftelijk pleiten " geen weet " te hebben , is meineed in civiele zaken , aangezien zij reeds lang de ganse strafklacht heeft kunnen lezen in 2007 en?in 2009?.
Zij?blijkt er van uit te gaan , en dat is complete nonsens , dat zijzelf zou moeten uitgenodigd door het parket voor zij er zelf " weet " van kan hebben . Het zou gepast zijn voor het parket haarzelf uit te nodigen , om haar absurde meineed eens uit te leggen . Volgens haar eigen conclusie wil ze dat zelf .
Zij kan niet opgeroepen worden in de eerder ingestelde ( 2005 )?procedure aangezien zij?niet de advokate is van DE FERM , POELEMANS of COPPENS ( valsheid in geschrifte ) .
Die valsheid in geschrifte was inderdaad inbegrepen in de strafklacht tegen DE FERM , POELEMANS en COPPENS .
C. "Omstandigheden "
( pagina 3 ) " ...hotel/restaurant uitbating met grond te Schilde welke eigendom was van zijn grootvader en een gedeelte van zijn zoon " .
Sinds 2004 bekwam ik van notaris POELEMANS ( zie zijn brief?in dossier 10/6032/A ) een notariele akte van gifte en afstand dd . 1968 , waarbij alle rechten ( eigendom en uitbating ) door grootvader / grootmoeder werden overgedragen aan mijn vader , met uitkoop van de zuster van mijn vader voor het symbolische bedrag van 1 miljoen BF . ( De reden was tevens dat zij voor 1957 uithuizig was , getrouwd met een zekere AGEMANS ( Beerse ) , geen enkele bijdrage in zaak of immobilium leverde sinds die datum ) .
Het is wel zo dat zij in de jaren tachtig , na de gewraakte " nietige verkoop " , waarin zij blijkbaar van het werkelijke bedrag op de hoogte kwam ( 25 miljoen?) terug wou komen op die 1968 notariele akte , omdat zij meende te weinig te hebben gekregen .
Zulks zou in de familie AGEMANS tot gerechterlijk onderzoek moeten leiden om het werkelijke bedrag van de nietige verkoop te achterhalen .
Maar er waren geen eigendomsrechten meer op naam GOMMARUS PIRON na 1968 ; zij waren allen per notariele akte exclusief op mijn vader overgedragen . Dus ik zie niet waarom DE SMET , op basis van de neergelegde dokumenten , eigendomsrechten op naam van de grootvader ontwaardt .
Zij liegt dus weer .
Het blijkt ook zo te zijn dat , via een frauduleuze , gefabriceerde volmacht van 15 juni 1982 , die eigenlijk alleen van het kantoor POELEMANS afkomstig kan zijn , omdat , bij mijn weten , mijn grootvader na 1968 geen enkel dokument meer tekende ( zulks was volgens hemzelf exclusief territorium van mijn vader geworden na 1968 ) , en COPPENS omstreeks 2007 beweerde mijn grootvader niet te kennen en nooit gezien te hebben ( terwijl de volmacht van 15 juni 1982 van zijn kantoor COPPENS?in VOSSELAAR zou hebben gekomen ) , iemand gewoon geprobeerd heeft , ex post facto ( RETROACTIEF , wat eigenlijk in het recht niet mogelijk is , tenzij de?ex-tunc werking van de ambtshalve absolute nietigheden ) de zaken vandaag frauduleus zo voor te stellen als zou mijn grootvader , VOOR ENIGE VERKOOP OOK TER SPRAKE KWAM ( ten laatste in april 1982 ) , mijn moeder exclusief zou hebben aangesteld .
De volmacht grootvader is van 15 juni voor een verkoopakte DE FERM van 16 juni 1982 ( op zichzelf ongerijmd ) , en DE SMET stelt nu leugenachtig :
( pagina 3 ) " voor de verkoop blijkt uit het stuk dat de grootvader van eiser zijnde Gommarus Piron als bijzondere lasthebber heeft aangesteld concluante en dit voor de verkoop en dit bij notariele akte " .
De volmacht is van 15 juni 1982 , terwijl de onderhandelingen etc door concluante maanden daarvoor werden gevoerd zonder over maar enige volmacht te beschikken . Het recht werkt nu eenmaal in principe ( weinig uitzonderingen ) niet retroactief .
-(pagina 3 ) " uit de stukken blijkt dat niet alleen de vader van eiser eigenaar was van het pand waarvan hij thans de absolute nietigheid opwerkt ( ? ) van de verkoop zodat hijzelf geenszins , quod non ( ? ) , de helft van de verkoopprijs zou bekomen " .
Mijn vader was excusief eigenaar sinds 1968 , met uitzondering van de helft van 648 M2 grond die waren aangekocht tezamen met concluante , " in gemeenschap " . Zelfs indien mijn grootvader mede-eigenaar was , ben ik , en niet B VANERMEN , ook dan de exclusieve erfgenaam van mijn grootvader (en mijn vader ) .
Het aandeel van B VANERMEN , gezien het huis /zaak volledig eigendom was van mijn vader ( legataris ) en ongeveer 90 % van de grond zijn eigendom was , komt ten hoogste neer voor B VANERMEN op 4 % van de grond ( en huis /zaak ) wat overlaat aan de kinderen
96 %, waarvan minstens de helft aan mijzelf toekomt ( 48 % ) .
-(pagina 3 ) " er blijkt dat , integenstelling tot de bewering van eiser , de ouders gehuwd waren met gemeenschap van aanwinsten " .
Zij waren getrouwd met scheiding van ( eigen ) goederen en gemeenschap van aanwinsten ( inkomsten ) .
Daarom komt de handtekening van mijn moeder niet voor op de akte van gifte en afstand ( 1968 ) waarbij het ganse beheer en eigendom van goed SCHILDE en zaak aan mijn vader werd overgedragen . Zij had gewoon niets met de eigen goederen van mijn vader te maken . De eigen spaarrekening van mijn vader betrof ook zijn eigen goederen , en was geen " gemeenschappelijke inkomstenrekening " ( niet behorend tot de "gemeenschap van inkomsten of aanwinsten " . )
- ( pagina 3 ) " zijnde een notariele akte en kan deze niet behept zijn met een absolute nietigheid " .
Enkele paginas daarvoor ( pagina 2 ) haalt DE SMET art 1319 Bw aan ( tweede paragraaf ) , waarin staat " Echter wordt , in geval van betichting van valsheid als hoofdvordering ( hetgeen in casu gebeurde ) , de uitvoering van de akte die men beweert vals te zijn , door de inveshuldigingstelling geschorst .... " .
Het recht voorziet nog op diverse andere plaatsen hoe een notariele akte absoluut nietig is .
Het ingeroepen art . 1599 BW :?De verkoop van andermans goed is ( absoluut ) nietig .
Het ingeroepen art . 3 Hyp W . ( de randmelding bij de verkoopakte werd verkregen ) .
Het is absolute waanzin /meineed te beweren dat een notariele akte niet behept kan zijn met een absolute nietigheid .
- ( pagina 3 ) : " dient immers rekening gehouden te worden met een tussentijd van 20 jaar met de verhoogde prijzen in de immobiliensector " .
De eerste ver(drie - ) dubbeling van de waarde ( van 2 naar 4-6?miljoen ) heeft plaats na amper 4 jaar ( 1986 ) . Immobilienprijzen stijgen niet zo snel . Ten hoogste kan men van 25 % meerwaarde gewagen . Hier zou er sprake zijn van 600 % meerwaarde op de frauduleuze akteprijs . Totaal onmogelijk .
D . "Opmerkingen " .
"Tenslotte wenst concluante nog te melden dat zij niet meer beschikt over rekeninguittreksels van die periode en dit ook niet door de wet bepaald wordt " .
In de dagvaarding en conclusies - zie bijvoorbeeld tussenvordering van 23 december 2010?( en bovendien reeds in 2002 in de brief ( in de stukken in het dossier ) van notaris BEUCKELAERS ), werd gevraagd om " verantwoording en rekenschap " van het beheer van de nalatenschap door B VANERMEN ( en zulks in toepassing van art .?art . 1358-1369 Ger Wb , en art .877- 882 Ger Wb ( OVERLEGGING VAN STUKKEN) , tegenover B VANERMEN en MR DE SMET , en zulks op straffe van een dwangsom ( art . 1385bis e.v ) , van 1000 EURO per dag na 18 januari 2010 , waarop de " rekening en verantwoording " niet omstandig is overlegd , of per dag dat gevraagde?verduidelijkingen betreffende het meegedeelde niet worden gegeven ( per email ) .)
Dat zijn duidelijke verplichtingen uit de wet zelf , waarvan concluante en DE SMET reeds erg lang op de hoogte zijn . Het gaat niet op te beweren dat men geen " rekeninguittreksels " meer heeft .
De verschillende onderdelen van de nalatenschap ( spaarrekening , roerende hotel / restaurant / taverne -goederen ; onroerend goed )?staan netjes opgesomd in de aangifte nalatenschap van POELEMANS 1974 zoals door mijzelf op 8 december 2010 bekomen te registratie Zandhoven , en op 23 december 2010 neergelegd ter griffie . Tegenpartij (DE SMET / VANERMEN ) moet zeer nauwkeurig reconstrueren wat er met al die goederen is gebeurd , en daarover rekening en beheer afleggen .
Ik meen dat , op basis van al haar leugens , meineed in civiele zaken , reeds eerdere mondelinge leugens in pleidooien ( vorige procedure in 6 B over de " strafklacht " ) , DE SMET op bewijsbare basis geband is nog verder mondeling of schriftelijk te "pleiten " in deze zaak , aangezien zij zich steeds opnieuw schuldig maakt aan nu bewezen?leugens .
De rechtbank kan er ( leugens van mr DE SMET )?m.i. geen rekening mee houden , en moet deze partij , met een schuldvordering van 5 miljoen EURO ( totaal heden vanaf 1982 ) , tegenover de' " beheerder nalatenschap B VANERMEN " , gelijk geven op basis van de aangetoonde waarheden .
Het verbod tegenover DE SMET , waartegen vanaf heden een strafklacht loopt op basis van 220 Swb , geldt ook tegenover B VANERMEN zelf , die conform de wet verantwoording van het beheer en afrekening ( 12 miljoen in 1982 ; door werking van samengestelde interest , conform het ingeroepen art . 1154 BW , gebracht op 5 miljoen EURO heden ) van de nalatenschap af te leggen heeft , en zulks zo snel mogelijk te doen heeft , aangezien deze zaak echt dringend is . B VANERMEN pleegde reeds meineed in civiele zaken in de procedure voor de vrederechter in Deurne in 1994 ( via een zekere advokaat DE BOEL ) , zodat in feite haar antwoord niet dient afgeacht te worden om deze partij volledig gelijk te geven ( zonder haar antwoord af te wachten ) .
?
2. Eis tot?om heropening van het onderzoek met verzoek om een strafrechtbanksbeslissing inzake parketnummer 45.99.93/05 van 24 januari 2005 ( SABIN BOUMANS - zie bijlage ) .
3. strafklacht wegens rechtsweigering ( art. 258 Swb ) en ambtsweigering ( art . 237 Swb ) tegen de huidige rechters in dezelfde zaak AR 10/6032/A .
Ik heb reeds herhaaldelijk in conclusies ( ook " Opmerkingen " ) aangekaart dat de rechters ( vooral de hoofdrechter ) blijk geven van enorme vooringenomenheid , vijandigheid en partijdigheid . De hoofdrechter zei bijvoorbeeld bij?de inleidende zitting , voor enig pleidooi in de zaak , dat hij van plan was de zaak op rechtsdag zonder gevolg af te wijzen .
Er werd bovendien in de dagvaarding en in daaropvolgende tussenvorderingen om de aanstelling van twee boedelnotarissen gevraagd , omdat het mij , zelfs al jurist uiterst moeilijk is de info betreffende de details van de nalatenschap te bekomen van notarissen of de Registraties ( bvb . Zandhoven )?.
Voor ( collega - ) notarissen wordt er bij notarissen en de registratie " gesprongen " ; niet echter als men maar gewoon universitair jurist is .
De Rechters ( o.l.v. de hoofdrechter ) hebben geweigerd over die pertinente vraag ( aangezien er sinds 16 november 2010 ook " aanvaarding van de nalatenschap onder voorrecht van boedelbeschrijving " werd gedaan?) , bij korte debatten , of bij tussenvordering ( 23 december 2010 , waarbij ook gevraagd was de termijn boedelbeschrijving met 3 maanden te willen verlengen ) uitspraak te doen , zodat die termijn boedelbeschrijving op 16 februari 2011, zonder verlenging en zonder aanstelling van boedelnotarissen ( die de afrekening van de nalatenschap dienden op te stellen ) dreigt te verlopen .
Ik lijd dus wel degelijk schade door de onwil , sinds de dagvaarding , inleidende zitting en tussenvorderingen 23 december 2010 , op die dringende vraag , per tussenvonnis , uitspraak te willen doen .
Zulks komt m.i.neer op rechtsweigering en ambtsweigering , die bovendien door de hoofdrechter vanaf de eerste zitting was aangekondigd .
U vindt die details ook terug in dossier 10/6032/A .
Ingediend met eerbied ,
PC?PIRON .?
( Relevant DOCs ( PIRON inheritance ; SCHILDE and HALLE ) :
SCHILDE
1.???????????Part of the disputed sales agreement of June 16 , 1982 on the PIRON estate ( signed by VANERMEN ) , explaining the " property origin " of said PIRON estate?, Turnhoutsebaan 556 , 2970 Schilde ; in three parts :
a ) 1031 m2 belonging exclusively to grandfather and?430 m2 ( in my view the house ) to the community between my grandfather and grandmother .
In 1968 , via act notary POELEMANS , both grandparents donate such goods to my father ; my mother does not sign anything ; her money is not involved .
b ) 980 m2 bought exclusively by my father in 1957 , before his marriage to B VANERMEN in 1959 . Both marry with " separation of own goods , but community of income " .
c ) 648 m2 bought together by my mother and father in 1964 , which thus falls within the community of their marriage . (but I am entitled to half of those 648 m2 , as my inheritance )
2 . The complete disputed notary act POELEMANS of June 16 , 1982 ( signed by my mother B VANERMEN only ) . On page 5 of said act is the " property origin " expose mentioned under B1 . On page 6 can be seen clearly that the origin of me having a copy of said act is a fax by notary DE FERM of June 19 , 2002 ( more than 20 years after the act being made ; I have no earlier copy ) .
Attached are two " proxies " ( brother and me ; grandfather ) : my signature does not fit any signature of myself before or after June 16 , 1982 ( see part A of these documents ) .
The proxy of my grandfather , the day before June 16 , 1982 , seems also false : he is 92 at that time , does not sign anything , and his signature looks a fascimile of the 1968 notary doc signature by POELEMANS .
3 . a ) " Note " at the side of the registered and disputed sales agreement June 16 , 1982 ; as duly demanded and instituted at the Antwerp property registry ( a part of the federal dept of finance ) , as asked by the private marshall who summons B VANERMEN to court in the " inheritance claim " in 2010 . The consequence is that the sales agreement is at least suspended .
3 . b ) List of all documents in fact attached to the summons ( to prove the case ) as off December 2010 .
4 . Overview of document received from said REGISTRAR above ,at a cost of 72, 38 EURO )?obtained in 2002 (?listing all transactions on said SCHILDE property ) , including about 12 million BF hypothecary credit obtained by DE FERM ( the June 16 , 1982 notary in Merksem , sold for 2.250.000 BF ) , for his client -buyer .
5 . Letter by notary POELEMANS of 2004 , via which he sends me 3 documents :
- the notary act mentioned above from 1968 .
- his inventory of 1974 about SCHILDE ( but not the " declaration of inheritance " 1974 which he forgets to send )
- again the disputed sales act 1982 .
6 . " Declaration of inheritance " made by POELEMANS -VANERMEN in 1974 , of which I only obtain a copy at the " Registrar " in December 2010 .
POELEMANS has wrongly catalogued the personal savings account of my father ( on which my mother has no rights ) as " community property .
He "forgets " to mention any rights of my father on the Halle property mentioned below .
7 . Proof that I accept the inheritance " under privilege of inventory " ( voorrecht van boedelbeschrijving ) as filed and published on 16 November 2010 , which is within 30 years of my brother ( other legal heir ) becoming of " majority of age " ( 21 on Dec 21 , 1981 ) .
HALLE :
1 .?Notary act 1964 by notary ANTHONIS , by which my mother buys , partly herself and partly ( for about half ) with my father , a property in HALLE ( KEMPEN?).
My father ( and his heirs ) did gain rights on said property .
POELEMANS and my mother " forgot " to mention it in their?" declaration inheritance 1974 " .
2 . Notary act 1990 by notary MARTENS , by which said good would be sold for 2. 750. 000 BF , in which my rights as heir could amount to at least 850.000 BF as off 1990 ( plus interest ) .