Travel Security and Duty of Care: Ground Transportation Risks and Secure Journey Management

Travel Security and Duty of Care: Ground Transportation Risks and Secure Journey Management

In the realm of travel security, there is a growing trend towards an "IT-oriented" corporate approach. This approach relies on the belief that utilizing various apps, which send alerts, provide analysis capabilities, and facilitate communication, is sufficient to fulfill an organization's duty of care. Consequently, the traditional mindset and "old school" that prioritized on-the-ground operations is now considered outdated and less relevant, particularly among large multinational companies. Instead, these companies often delegate these responsibilities to vendors, who may not always be reliable in case of incidents.

I personally believe that travel security encompasses a more holistic approach. It goes beyond relying solely on technology and emphasizes the importance of comprehensive measures such as analysis, training, information dissemination, communication, and operational readiness. By considering all these aspects together, organizations can ensure a more robust and effective travel security framework.

Ground transportation is a critical component of travel security, yet it is often overshadowed by cost considerations, neglecting the potential risks involved. This article delves into the alarming statistics surrounding ground transportation safety and highlights the significance of adopting a duty of care approach to address these risks effectively.

A thorough understanding of the risks associated with ground transportation is essential. Consider the following statistics:

  • According to the World Health Organization (WHO), it is estimated that globally, approximately 1.35 million people die each year as a result of road traffic accidents, which equates to an average of nearly 3,700 deaths per day or one death every 23 seconds. It is important to note that these figures represent fatalities and do not account for non-fatal injuries or property damage caused by car incidents.
  • In low- and middle-income countries with inadequate road infrastructure, approximately 90% of road traffic deaths occur. This calls for urgent measures to improve transportation systems and implement robust safety measures.
  • Only 34 countries, representing 29% of the global population, have drink-driving laws that align with recommended best practices. This inadequacy emphasizes the need for stringent legislation and enforcement to mitigate the dangers posed by drink-driving.
  • Urban speed limits recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) are met by merely 47 countries, accounting for a mere 13% of the world's population. The widespread lack of adherence to appropriate speed limits in urban areas increases the vulnerability of pedestrians, cyclists, and other road users.
  • Shockingly, 80% of countries worldwide allow the sale of vehicles that fail to meet basic safety standards. This leaves millions of travelers exposed to unnecessary risks, as these vehicles lack critical safety features, including seat belts, airbags, and anti-lock braking systems.
  • ?Annually, up to 50 million people sustain non-fatal injuries due to road traffic accidents, leading to long-term physical and psychological consequences for the victims.
  • Road traffic accidents cost countries an average of 3% of their gross domestic product, imposing a substantial economic burden encompassing medical expenses, productivity losses, infrastructure damage, and increased insurance premiums.

Despite the severity of these statistics, road safety often takes a backseat in travelers' minds during trip planning. While travelers may be more aware of the risks associated with crime or assault, the significance of road safety is often underestimated. The prevailing "it'll never happen to me" attitude can lead to a disregard for potential road-related risks.

To address these concerns, organizations must prioritize duty of care and ensure that travel policies explicitly address road safety risks, rather than solely focusing on financial considerations. An effective policy is one that is clearly communicated to all employees, accompanied by measures to demonstrate the dissemination of information and ensure buy-in. It is crucial to include all aspects of ground transportation, including employees' personal vehicles and transfers to and from airports.

Organizations should conduct comprehensive risk assessments for countries where they operate or employees frequently travel. Assigning risk levels based on the organization's risk appetite or utilizing travel risk management companies can provide a structured approach. Enhanced due diligence measures, such as engaging secure journey management services, should be implemented in higher-risk countries (level 4 and 5). For lower-risk countries (level 1, 2, and 3), organizations should determine the minimum accreditation requirements for ground transportation providers to ensure traveler safety, fulfill duty of care obligations, and safeguard their reputation.

In higher-risk regions, organizations should consider secure journey management services to enhance traveler safety. These services can range from trained drivers ensuring secure transportation to highly skilled close protection officers accompanying travelers throughout their in-country journeys. Effective journey management begins with comprehensive pre-trip planning, including pre-trip intelligence, risk assessments, and route and venue reconnaissance. This proactive approach ensures that all aspects of the journey are thoroughly evaluated, accounting for individual traveler profiles and potential risks.

Ground transportation safet and securityy is an often neglected aspect of corporate travel security, despite its significant impact on traveler well-being. By adopting a duty of care approach, integrating road safety into travel policies, conducting risk assessments, and considering secure journey management services, organizations can effectively mitigate ground transportation risks. A comprehensive and technical approach to travel security, encompassing all facets of ground transportation, is imperative to ensure the safety and security of travelers and protect the organization's interests.

Andrea Piovan

01/06/2023

Paul McMahon

Servant Leader with a People-First approach. Coach, Speaker, Teacher, Mentor - Health & Well-being Ambassador - Proponent of Positive Psychology. - Oh, and a Physical Security and Protective Services expert too :)

1 年

When I worked in Travel Security I delivered a lot of Personal Travel Security and Awareness Training (PTSAT) sessions for clients - one of the first questions I would ask the groups was 'what do you think the greatest risk is to international travellers?'. Most would say Terrorism (which grabs the headlines and captures peoples attention) but, statistically the greatest risks (and incidents that needed support) are road traffic accident and medical / health emergencies.

Steve Phelps

Freelance Intelligence Analyst / Security Specialist / Writer. Seeking more work. Challenging accepted hypotheses, testing popular narrative and provoking productive discussion.

1 年

I have always considered the condition of the roads, the standard of driving, and the roadworthiness of other vehicles as potential threats when carrying out a risk assessment for a road-move. I believe the image is from Nigeria? I spent the best part of 15 years there, including a period of eight years living in Lagos. If the image is not from Nigeria it certainly could be. Wherever it is from, it paints a thousand words.

Renato Jacques de Barros

?? Supply Chain & Logistics Manager | Import & Export Compliance | Lean Six Sigma Yellow Belt | Agile | ERP Optimization | Warehouse & Procurement Strategy | Dual Citizenship (EU & Brazil)

1 年

Andrea Piovan I've worked in Onne for almost 3y. The trip to Port Harcourt, that should take less than 30min as per distance, used to take several unpredictable hours. Without the MOPOL service, I cannot imagine what could have happened many times.

Ejike Okonkwo

Operations Management | QHSE & Compliance | Loss Management | Models | Startup Firms

1 年

This was part of the work I did while carrying out route hazard mapping few years ago. Great article Sir.

ERNEST ODILI

Area Security Advisor (ASA) at Heirs Energies

1 年

Andrea Piovan This is a great read, you made mention of pre trip intelligence gathering which resonates with me, while this is a proactive measure for the securing of transporters, it doubles for their safety also, as it creates an opportunity to change route if need be. Denial is part of many causes of security incidence on transit, people need to know that once they are out of the bubble, anything can happen.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Andrea Piovan的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了