Transparency, please
The Wellington economics fraternity was up in arms last week. The reason was a job opening.
Treasury is seeking a Senior Analyst for its Economic Strategy unit. Advertised as a ‘unique opportunity’, Treasury explained they were looking for “a well-rounded candidate”. Fair enough.
But then the Government’s economic advisory department added that “an economics background is not essential.”
Former Treasury employees and academic economists were outraged. How could you have a senior position in economic strategy without knowing economics, they asked. Quite.
Still, there is another and equally concerning problem about Treasury’s job advertisement: it totally lacks specificity.
This is everything the job ad tells us about the candidate’s required characteristics:
Based on these requirements, anyone could apply. None of these criteria are specific, let alone formal.
Keeping public sector job ads so vague is problematic. It opens the door to arbitrariness and stands against best international practices.
New Zealand regularly leads Transparency International’s ‘Corruption Perception Index’. So it might be worth also taking their recruitment advice onboard.
Transparency International’s Anti-Corruption Resource Centre warns that “in many developing countries, weak HR management processes have resulted in oversized and under-qualified civil services, with distorted incentive structures and poor work ethics that ultimately undermine the goal of building a strong, efficient and accountable public sector.”
Now, New Zealand is not a developing country. But we do not want to become one, either.
Transparency International strongly recommends precise definitions of skills in public sector recruitment: “If merit is vaguely defined in broad terms, such as ‘able to do the job’, many candidates may be adequate, and the ambiguity may be misused to favour relatives or political supporters to the detriment of other outstanding candidates.”
This is not corruption of the bribery kind. But it allows an intellectual corruption in which a candidate’s actual qualification can be trumped by irrelevant considerations.
Next time Treasury advertises a position, it should be more specific. If it wants a lawyer or an accountant instead of an economist, fine, but then it should say so. Ideally, it should identify the qualifications and experience of the candidate.
What is good advice for other countries is good advice for New Zealand.
First published in 'Insights', The New Zealand Initiative's weekly newsletter. Subscribe here.
Senior Analyst at Oranga Tamariki—Ministry for Children
3 年I think we are heading that way regardless of our HR practices.... I just wonder what will happen to the $NZ once synthetic milk and lab-grown meat will become cheaper than dairy/milk... We don't invest enough in ICT, so once our meat/dairy exports are down, the only thing we will be able to sell to the world will be tourism
Unfortunately there has been a trend ina lot of public service recruitment advertising to be just like this. It applies equally across Australia and helps to create the perception thatjobs are being targeted to suit political ideology of the government rather than tequired skills. It’s a reason why many people won’t apply for government jobs. Even if the perception is wrong, perception determines reality
Former Chairman & CEO. Foreign Correspondent. Chevening Scholar.
3 年Too late!!!
Electronic Engineer
3 年Many countries don't employ the specifically qualified people though there is enough tallent. And other countries don't believe on foreign people whatever their qualification and experience. They tell to study first there. The average people can't study in Europe or any advanced countries. So tallented people may not migrate in that way. But the people only do have money.
Independent director and strategic advisor | Veteran | Volunteer | Passionate advocate for serving and former New Zealand Defence Force personnel
3 年Astounding…and yet so disappointingly unsurprising.