Transitioning from a Software Developer to an Engineering Manager or CTO: Understanding Your Team

The world of software development is constantly evolving, and as technology advances, so do the roles and responsibilities of those who work in the field. Many software developers find themselves at a crossroads in their career where they must decide between advancing their technical skills or transitioning into a leadership role. For some, the allure of a management or CTO position can be irresistible, as it presents new challenges and opportunities to drive the direction of an organization's technical strategy. However, making the leap from software developer to engineering manager or CTO requires more than just technical expertise. In this article, we will explore the various factors that developers should consider before taking on these roles and the skills and qualities they need to navigate this change and how existing engineering managers can excel in their current role.

While software development and management may seem like two vastly different areas, there are certain skills that overlap, such as problem-solving, communication, and project management. However, there are also new skills that must be learned, such as team building, strategic planning, and business acumen.

In this series of articles, we will discuss the challenges that software developers may face when transitioning into a leadership role, including the shift from being a doer to a delegator, managing conflicts and expectations, and maintaining technical skills while also focusing on managerial responsibilities.

Furthermore this article is focused on how to manage people in your team - and tweak the dynamic to deliver better results by just understanding people.

In my experience, I have noticed a few anecdotes that help me understand how to approach different challenges, such as

1)?????Think of people like compilers.

Thinking of people as compilers is a helpful way to understand their capacity and complexity of understanding. Just like a compiler takes information and compares it against a set of rules to execute a task, individuals also process information differently based on their skillset and capacity.

Some individuals may be faster at processing information while others may be slower due to the complexity of the task at hand. Some may be able to execute a task with the information they have at hand, while others may question the input to ensure they have all the necessary information to execute the task accurately.

Like how a compiler filters out unnecessary code, individuals may also filter out irrelevant information to focus on what's important. Evaluating an individual's ability to filter out irrelevant information and identify the performance of a task after it's executed can help identify their capacity and skillset.

By understanding the unique ways individuals process information, managers can assign tasks that align with their strengths and provide support where necessary. This can lead to more effective task execution and overall success in their roles.

It's important to note that just like compilers, individuals may also have limitations in terms of their capacity and capability. While some may be able to handle complex tasks, others may struggle with the same level of complexity.

As a manager, it's important to assess an individual's skillset and capacity before assigning tasks. This can involve conducting skills assessments, giving problem-solving exercises, or providing opportunities for training and development.

Moreover, by understanding the unique strengths and weaknesses of individuals, managers can build teams that complement each other's skills and work together more effectively. For example, a team may consist of individuals who excel at executing tasks quickly and efficiently, while others are better suited for documentation and quality assurance.

Thinking of individuals as compilers can provide a helpful framework for understanding their capacity and complexity of understanding. By evaluating an individual's skillset and capacity, managers can assign tasks that align with their strengths, provide necessary support, and build teams that complement each other's skills for overall success.

2)?????Skillset vs Complexity

When it comes to evaluating the performance of individuals in software development, it's important to distinguish between skillset and complexity. If you assign a challenging problem to someone who lacks the necessary skills, they will struggle to find a solution. On the other hand, even the most skilled employees may have difficulty solving a complex and difficult problem.

As a manager, it's crucial to understand this difference and identify the root cause of an individual's difficulty in solving a problem. If the problem is too complex, you may need to provide additional resources such as training, mentoring, or additional team members to help overcome the challenge. However, if the problem is related to a lack of skills, you may need to identify and provide opportunities for the individual to develop the necessary skills.

To evaluate the cause of the problem, there are several methods that managers can use. One approach is to conduct a skills assessment to identify any gaps in the individual's skillset. This can help to identify areas where training or support may be needed. Another approach is to engage the individual in a problem-solving exercise to evaluate their ability to approach a problem and identify any areas of weakness. This can help to identify whether the individual lacks the necessary skills or if the problem is simply too complex.

In addition to identifying the cause of the problem, it's important for managers to provide support and resources to help individuals overcome challenges. This may include training, mentorship, or providing additional team members to help tackle complex problems.

Overall, understanding the distinction between skillset and complexity is crucial for effective management in software development. By identifying the root cause of problems and providing appropriate support, managers can help individuals develop the skills they need to tackle challenging problems and drive success in their roles.

3)?????Separating Good Documenters from Good Executioners

There is often a tension between the need for documentation and the desire to move quickly to the next task. High-functioning individuals may be especially prone to this issue, as they may be eager to tackle new challenges and less interested in spending time on tedious tasks like documentation.

On the other hand, some individuals are meticulous documenters who want to ensure that everything is perfectly referenced and written. While this attention to detail can be valuable, it can also slow down the development process and create frustration for those who prioritize speed and efficiency.

It's important to recognize that these are different skillsets, and neither group is inherently better than the other. Good executioners are essential for implementing software solutions effectively, while good documenters ensure that the development process is well-documented, organized, and easy to follow.

Finding individuals who excel at both document creation and software execution can be difficult. However, an ideal situation is to pair individuals who possess these skills and have them work together to solve the problem while also documenting it. This collaboration can help to ensure that documentation is created without sacrificing speed or efficiency in the development process.

As a manager, it's important to recognize the strengths and weaknesses of team members and assign tasks accordingly. For example, if a developer is not interested in documentation, it may be more efficient to assign this task to someone who excels at it. This not only ensures that documentation is created but also allows the developer to focus on what they do best.

?

In conclusion – using the framework(s) mentioned above – individuals, whether they are developers moving into a more technical role, or seasoned engineering managers looking to understand different team dynamics – can really benefit. The path of a technical manager is an ever changing one, quite like what the landscape of technology is. You need to be able to come out of the mindset of 1s and 0s and try to understand people, which is a little bit more complex than machines unfortunately. The ability to balance technical expertise with people management skills is essential to drive success in a leadership position. But by keeping these three things in mind, engineering managers can excel in their roles and help their teams achieve their goals.