Transition Engineering History
Susan Krumdieck
Professor, Author and Leader in Energy Transition Engineering, MNZM, MGATE, FRSA
In this article I would like to explore the current transition period by looking at history. We have a mission to accomplish, obviously, Net Zero like Now. But we are taking about changing things in a purposeful way that I'm pretty sure has no precedent in history. This article will present the case that this time the way to accomplish the mission is from the inside out, from the ground up, and that is not how we have been looking at it - yet.
The experiment of society and technology
Human society has 60,000 years of experimentation with survival as a objectively hopeless wild animal – we have to be a social animal. In that society there are the 98% that do what is normal, what was done yesterday, what the traditional ways and teachings and skills are set up to maintain. Then, there are about 2% who are observer-tinkerers. Leonardo da Vinci is one of the most famous ones, and the outcomes of his technical and scientific disruptive thinking are aligned with the vast majority of such tinkerers – his “ideas and concepts” never made it to the market.
These tinkerers are our survival strategy. On one hand we have to not change what works. It would be way too risky if people tried out innovative new ideas or got visions all the time. No – We hunt the mammoth in the fall, we tan the hide like this, we eat these plants after they change to red… Don’t experiment with what works, that could risk disaster for our clan. But – if something changes, if the tinkerer comes up with something that fits, and improves the chances of survival and the tinkerer can communicate the innovation in a way that can integrate it into the culture… then we have a technology change. That change will change society. Hopefully it will all be slow enough that society can cope and adjust and adapt, and it won’t have too many unintended consequences. I present proof by evidence:
- Stirrups, chimneys, wheels, ploughs
- Salted meat, smoked meat, fermented grains, cheese, pickling
- Ceramics, metals, fibre spinning, weaving, looms
Until the industrial revolution
Now the observer-tinkerer genie is out of the bottle. Now it isn’t survival it is wealth creation that they deliver to society. OK, of course there are a lot of good things like sanitation and heated dwellings, but this unleashing of the inventor has changed the dynamic of society in a way that maybe society wasn’t prepared for. Social evolution will have to hurry up.
Until World War II
There was a special thing that happened – standardization, especially in the USA. The industrial capacity from across the huge and diverse country had to get standardized in order to manufacture the war systems. After the war, that new idea of standardization went into the universities and they taught standard methods, materials and practices. Standardisation became commoditised and consolidated and ensconced in compliance, and became, well, the standard in all industries. As new technologies shot out of the military research spending they rapidly were standardized as well, as you can see with the naked eye. Look at any graph of anything from 1880 to 2020 – there is a massive jacknife upward starting in 1950. The social integration of this new engineering standardization became called “progress” and economic growth and we created our own story where the explosive impact of standardisation became the core value of the society.
And here we are
All of us packed into a run-away train that only a few know how to operate. Some scientists have warned that we are going too fast and heading for a cliff but the owners of the train are cheering for more speed.
I am 100% sure that we do not have the political, social or economic corrective actionability that will stop the disaster. The engineers have to safely slow the train, pull the emergency brake without derailing. And yet, none of the passengers on the (metaphorical) run-away train even know that there are engineers, they’ve paid for their seat and they want to know what movies are available.
Four step strategy to accomplish the mission
- Problem Definition: the problem is that 80% too much fossil fuel is being produced, and that 80% too much land and waterway destruction is happening every year.
- Corrective Action: Prevent what is preventable. Don't do what must not be done.
- Surprise Solution: A massive transformational change across the spectrum of engineering professionals changes the professional duty of care to include compliance with the COP21 Paris Agreement, and all other science-based targets. All professionals rapidly up-skill with basic "Climate Emergency First Responder" training. The engineering professions change their methods and ethos, therefore the world changes as downshift of fossil fuel production is transition engineered.
- And society deals with it.
Professor, Author and Leader in Energy Transition Engineering, MNZM, MGATE, FRSA
3 年Here is the rousing call for Transition Engineering by the Irish President if you haven't heard it yet. #transitionengineering https://president.ie/en/diary/details/president-delivers-keynote-address-at-engineers-ireland-conference-on-climate-action/video
Green Chemical Engineer
3 年Interesting and I would suggest those 2% of observer tinkerers are in small companies / enterprises and not the big companies our government thinks will get us out of our problems but who weed out or don't hire folk who think different to them. Re surprise solutions I saw recently IChemE has a draft charter for engineers to do some of what you say but I wouldn't trust them an inch to implement it after seeking their two faced stance on palm oil and other things. Just lip service. A problem I see is large numbers of engineers are still doing more harm than good but tell each other they are green with bull and re enforce each others behaviour so it just continues. Maybe society (and lawyers) need to call them out more and expose the pretence and ask how its helping their own children.
Lead Innovator - Hypuljet Ltd UK
3 年Sense and very logical, one problem Susan, you stopped ... The problem we have - there are speakers at the top who have aligned with the Fossil Fuels CEOs et al and they have not extracted any significant agreement out of them. Shell and BP I have emailed/tweeted/Linked in--- Hydrogen engine - developed to On the Road Proof of Concept for under €4,000,000 and licenced to All Auto makers by 2030-31 could have retrofitted 400,000,000 existing on the Road Petrol/diesel vehicles to H2 Zero emissions. difficult but attainable - Legacy Auto produced 90,000,000 units in 2019 To be clear to all reading this -- in terms of Global Transport Fleet - there will be 2 billion Road Vehicles there are also many others to get to Net Zero by 2050 and start 2025 that = 80,000,000 per year average. However, lets see the problem it they are all - new EVs only ---too expensive and especially for new vehicle owners - they need to run their new vehicle for 15 years to get value - because to exchange to a new vehicle - they will only get scrap value. It is fundamental to have an option which can decarbonise these millions of vehicles - they equate to billions of tonnes of GHG emission before they come to the end of life - this is the low-hanging fruit. What Auto makers and Govts have to work out is can the present two options of Fuel Cells and Batteries meet this proactive route --- having been in this space for the past 18 years - plus 30 years in the earlier transport arena - I feel qualified to state clearly - FCEVs and BEVs cannot retro fit 400,000,000 vehicles in a 5-6 year time frame. We at HyPulJet Ltd cannot carry out that monumental feat, No it will take cooperation - of all parties and direction - That is the Major Problem of Major Problems -- there is no shortage of people talking the good talk - of many and varied directions, some like Fusion have had £££Trillions and managed to hold the plasma for 8 seconds, Hydrogen from Steam Reformation and CCS to store in dead oil wells - Multi Millions at Hatfield Colliery ended No CCS but some people had massive pay cheques. As an SME I have to have a SWOT analysis of my engine - where is that SWOT analysis by Shell & Co for major production of Hydrogen-- Reality is that these people do not have anything which if proves to work - will see take up by millions of consumers - it has to be affordable. HyPulJet engine generator needs initial modelling to validate the engine will do what it says on the Label ---- it is absolutely clear that a Hydrogen Zero emissions engine offers Global Transport an option to bring about Affordable Zero Emissions vehicles on a par with the IC engine vehicles There will not be the Major issues of RE generation expansion or Hydrogen plants etc. as the engine will use H2 -O2 as fuel and it will be produced in a Flow type fuel system on board the EV Fuel from water - may well not happen - but we are going to give it the best shot and if not HyPulJet we may well give pointers to others who will get there. We have had a 5-6 month break down but plans are now back on track - hence my confidence is back that in 10 days we will be back on track to start the count down to Crowd Funding bid. Regards Al Scott