Transforming the Employer-Employee and Employee-Customer Dynamics. That's what Matters.
?We talk endlessly about how we must change how we “do” strategy. I certainly go on and on about how we must fundamentally transform the whole strategy management process – formulation, execution and learning and see them as more holistic, dynamic and adaptable, rather that sequential and static.
I have also grown to recognize that transforming how we think about strategy management in isolation is pointless, without also fundamentally altering how we think about structure, enterprise architecture, culture, and how we relate with the external environment and stakeholders, hence my Adaptive Strategy Management in the Age of Uncertainty Framework and Methodology. See https://www.dhirubhai.net/pulse/age-uncertainty-requires-fundamental-organizational-james-creelman/
But the more I pondered this, the greater the realization that it’s not about rethinking strategy, structure, etc., but rethinking how we think.
Organizations are simply groups of people coming together to work to a common goal – deliver a product or service to a customer (be that in a commercial or not-for-profit setting). So, what really matters is what the group “thinks” and how that resonates with the thinking of each individual employee.
Lessons from the Pandemic
While going through the “joys” of the pandemic – lockdowns, other restrictions, and a total disruption of our lives – it became clear to many that when we emerged on the other side, much would change, we just didn’t know what that would look like.
It has some similarities (in a vastly different context) with how the end of World War 2 impacted the United Kingdom. Winston Churchill had led a Conservative dominated governmental coalition through the greatest was in human history. Yet idolized as he was, Churchill and his party lost the 1945 general election to Labour by a landslide.?People didn’t want things to return to being how they were in 1939. A great transformation took place – the birth of the National Health Service, extension of the welfare state, nationalizing of many industries, as some major examples.
Post-pandemic there has also been a sense of the need for transformation, which is perhaps one reason why we are seeing so much regional conflict right now (Ukraine, Taiwan, etc,) as the old guard try desperately to return to how things once were.
Organizational thinking and dynamics
Let’s turn our attention back to organizations and the ongoing (and still unclear) transformation in thinking and dynamics,.
Remote working, powered by technology and especially once we got our heads around Zoom calls, became the norm for many and we liked it, as it made clear the potential for ways of working that enabled more time with family, friends and for other pursuits, rather than the daily trudge into work and back and many unproductive hours at our desks.
Most employees now want the flexibility “forced” onto them and their employers by the pandemic. Although there is a a recognition that regular face-to-face meet ups with colleagues in important for bonding and better reading non-verbal communication cues, but this can be done as easily in a bar as in a meeting room (and oftentimes much more productively!!).
But many organizations and its managers resist, as they are still beholden to the diktats of Frederick W. Taylor, et, al – if you can’t see them, they won’t work. Workers are naturally lazy.
Well, sorry, but that style of thinking just doesn’t cut it anymore. Organizations have the best educated and most knowledgeable employees in history, and they don’t want to be treated with distrust anymore – and aren’t accepting it. Note how many staff have simply left the traditional workplace, because they don’t want it and won’t have it. So, we have massive job shortages, scratch our heads, and wonder why.
领英推荐
The employee-employer “contract” must be ripped up and rewritten.
There has also been a noticeable shift in the employee-customer relationship. People came out of the pandemic less tolerant of poor service, such as having to wait in line for eons and worse, waiting on the phone for hours while their “important” call gets though to a call centre. They are also becoming more demanding of individualized services and solutions. Again, they do not want to return to the way it was back then.
Front-line service workers are becoming increasingly stressed by customer demands and not being able to provide adequate service due to having to follow strict organizational procedure and policies.
?Increasingly I overhear staff saying to customers, “Look I know this isn’t good but it isn’t our fault, it’s the stupid company rules and/or the fact that the managers are idiots”.
I have been told several times recently by a staff member that things are bad because their managers don’t know what they are doing (although I imagine they are just doing what their own bosses tell them what to do). Keep in mind that employees are customers outside of work.
So, we also need to tear up strict rulebooks of customer-facing policies and procedures, while maintaining proper governance oversight. Smarter minds that mine will figure out what that will look like.
Employee and customer dissatisfaction and disengagement will increase sharply, at least in the majority of organizations who don’t “get” what’s going on. But don’t worry, they will throw even more billions at employee and customer engagement programs – which won’t work of course.
Parting Thoughts
The “thinking dynamics” will extend to how we relate to partners, suppliers and other stakeholders – and even competitors.
But at the heart of organizational transformation is understanding the new post-pandemic employer/employee and employee/customer dynamics and adapting appropriately and effectively.
No new framework or latest consulting “solution” will fix that.
Ends
James Creelman is Director of the UK-based Cardinal Management Consulting and an Associate Director of Strategia Worldwide. His available for consulting, training, or research support in Adaptive Strategy Management in the Age of Uncertainty.
James can be contacted on +44 7933 575340 or?[email protected]
Process Architect | Educator | Systems Thinker | Advocate | Leads Teams that Solve Complex Problems
2 年Thanks James.?I agree, Systems Thinking works. Action follows mindset.?? This statement weighs heavily on my heart in your article.?Front-line service workers are becoming increasingly stressed by?customer demands and not being able to provide adequate service due to having to follow strict organizational procedure and policies.This is the cost of poor quality.?Customer demands need to be fully understood so we who serve can be proactive, caring, at least be consistent then exceptional, and be good brand ambassadors.?Ques - Could context (local, regional, international matrix or other structure) be considered a critical success factor? Could practise or "winging it" over defined procedures be sustainable and make companies change ready or able to pivot quickly?? I believe good design and automation of procedures, that meet customer requirements, and implement the rules (policies) will still effectively sustain execution (the system) through an appropriate or the right structure.? This is measurable, predictive, shapes behaviours and can be managed and improved. SLAs can be shared with confidence and processes wont be all over the place in this VUCA Environment. This worries me some.
Author.
2 年Thanks for sharing. On "dynamic thinking" see Prof. C. Dweck's "growth thinking".
Author.
2 年Thanks for sharing. On "dynamic thinking" see Prof. C. Dweck's "growth thinking".
Strategy Management technician. 20,000+ smart followers. For an example of a strong nation, look where European cities are bombed every day by Dark Ages savages. Slava Ukraini! ????
2 年Very well written article! And only opening the door on such unexplored subject as the dynamics of Strategy and of our way of thinking about it.
Searching for new Position in QA, QC, Production, CI or ESG Management. Mail contact: [email protected]. Production of Plastic Packaging and Plastic Recycling is my experience since 1985.
2 年I am sure you don't mind when I share this post with my Friend and Team Members. One experience I like to add: In 4 years I had not once sent a mail to a Chinese supplier, which was not answered within 24 hrs ( half of them in less than 4). Customer Relations and Service I believe is the key. One Customer we were working w2w (Hole in the wall) even Product Development we had very close contact and were thinking they should be located in the same room. This to me is first priority. And yes. Strategy and handling it, I am still learning. Thank you for your great posts