The Traditional Method Just Doesn't Work
Steve Semler
L&D Leader | Leadership Coach | Learning Solutions Engineer | Author | Veteran
There’s a problem in the training industry that we don’t like to talk about with clients.
It’s responsible for much of the cynicism and grumbling about leadership training.
I’ve had the opportunity to develop and implement solutions, though.
The problem is this: You cannot develop useful levels of on-the-job skill from a one-shot training program.
After traditional training programs, the learner is released back to their work area and expected to “just do it” on the job. To use what they learned. To reap the return on the investment in training.
But this simply does not work.
Check this scenario and see if it seems familiar to you:
Training gives exposure to those management and leadership concepts, but doesn’t offer the chance to become skilled in using them. (The exact same principle applies to other types of training topics, too.)
领英推荐
How often have you seen this happen?
There are better solutions. Here are three:
The third option of building mental fitness is a relatively new concept when applied to leadership development in this way. I am finding that it is extremely powerful for leaders at all levels!
Straight-up training programs done the traditional way don’t work. We don’t always like to talk about that, but we keep building them. There are better ways to help leaders transition into new roles and get the skills they need to be successful.
I used elements #1 and #2 along with parts of #3 in the solution for a regional insurance client I rolled out this past year. I also have a full solution with all three parts built for technical leaders. If developing a new leader onboarding or training program (or customizing either of these designs) could help your organization, I'd like to schedule time to talk to you about what that would look like and how quickly you'd be seeing benefits. Contact me and schedule a time to talk.
Leadership matters! I would love to hear your ideas and suggestions.
With focus on learning,
–Steve
Helping you succeed like never before!
1 周What a refreshing perspective on training! Blending different learning methods is such a smart approach to truly empower individuals. It's all about creating real, actionable skills that lead to growth! Excited to see how these ideas evolve in the L&D space!
Enterprise Transformation & Digital Strategy Executive | Data-Driven Innovation | AI & Analytics Excellence | Organizational Leadership | Change Management | C-Suite Advisor
3 周Your article hits on a striking paradox in talent development. We invest heavily in structured new hire onboarding - from day-long orientations to buddy systems and scheduled check-ins. Yet when promoting our best ICs to managers, we often hand them the keys and wish them luck. Your three-solution framework (coaching, spaced training, and mental fitness) could be the blueprint for a proper 'New Manager Onboarding' program. After all, if we want to retain both our new managers AND their future reports, shouldn't we invest in their transition with the same rigor as a new hire? The stakes are arguably even higher. #LeadershipDevelopment #TalentRetention
Innovative Product Management Leader | Growth and Efficiency | Creative Pragmatism | Coach and Mentor
3 周Great article! The “reward” for high individual achievement shouldn’t necessarily be leadership; the two are very different sorts of things and being good in one does not mean a person will be good in both. Thinking through growth pathways that lean in on individual contribution or gradually introducing leadership concepts gives high performers options and leaders formal ways of coaching leaderhip skills.
Absolutely spot on. I saw this all the time when I was at Amazon. They'd promote a tech rock star to a manager role with maybe a single class and then wonder why many of them weren't as successful as they could be. Most especially as you note, they revert back to what made them successful in the previous role.