Tourism, Development, and Balance: Are National Parks Missing the Mark?
Steve Hesmondhalgh
Managing Director & Business Owner at AMS Planning with expertise in Planning, Development and Sustainability. Author of Newsletter 'Planning at the Coalface' and Owner of the Rural Planning and Diversification Group
National Parks are the crown jewels of Britain’s landscape, showcasing rugged mountains, tranquil moors, and diverse wildlife. But as visitor numbers grow and rural economies face mounting pressures, these protected areas are caught in a tug of war: how do we protect them for future generations while allowing the sustainable evolution they often need?
Park Planners in these landscapes face a difficult question. Are we safeguarding our National Parks or shackling them to outdated ideals? As the challenges of climate change, over-tourism, and rural depopulation grow more pressing, are we preserving these areas in aspic, or can positive development provide the solutions they need?
The Preservation-Progress Paradox
At the heart of this debate are the National Parks’ founding principles:
The balance between conservation and development was always meant to be nuanced. Yet many who work in the planning system describe a culture of resistance, where the dominant question is, “How can we refuse this application?” rather than, “How can this contribute positively?”
When Saying No Comes at a Cost
A recent pre-application proposal we submitted at AMS Planning highlights the challenges. A working farm in a National Park village was causing significant harm: noise, smells, and environmental degradation impacted residents and the local area. A proposal was put forward to relocate the farm outside the village, build a small number of houses, and set aside much of the site for a tourism accommodation scheme.
This was designed to tackle the goals of reducing harm, delivering homes for local people, supporting sustainable tourism, and ensuring the farm’s future viability. Yet it faced a tepid response, with planners focusing on the hurdles rather than the opportunities.
This story is not unique. Across the UK, similar tensions are playing out, with recent cases in Galloway, Loch Lomond, the Cairngorms, and Wales providing eye-opening lessons.
Case Study 1: Galloway National Park – A Gift or a Burden?
The push to designate Galloway as Scotland’s third National Park highlights the push-pull of tourism and conservation. Proponents argue that National Park status could rejuvenate the area, attracting investment and creating jobs in struggling rural communities. Yet critics, including local farmers, warn that over-tourism could replicate the problems seen on the North Coast 500:
The Galloway case forces us to ask whether National Park designation inherently benefits communities—or whether it must be coupled with forward-thinking infrastructure and tourism management.
Case Study 2: Loch Lomond – The Flamingo Land Fiasco
A proposed £30 million resort by Flamingo Land near Loch Lomond sparked one of the largest conservation protests in recent memory. Nearly 100,000 people signed a petition opposing the development, which included hotels, lodges, and a monorail.
Opposition Highlights:
Support Highlights:
The fierce backlash forced Flamingo Land to revise its plans, highlighting the importance of involving local communities early and balancing ecological concerns with economic opportunity.
Case Study 3: Cairngorms – A Winter Wonderland or Worry?
In the Cairngorms, over 370 tourism businesses launched a campaign branding the park as the “ultimate winter destination.” This effort sought to capitalise on off-season tourism and support local businesses.
But residents raised concerns:
领英推荐
This campaign showcases the tension between promoting tourism and managing the infrastructure and environmental impacts needed to support it sustainably. It shows it's not just locals complaining about not getting planning permission....it's locals saying 'please leave us alone'
Case Study 4: Freshwater West Beach – Dobby vs. Dolphins
In Wales, Freshwater West Beach gained fame as the fictional grave of Harry Potter’s Dobby the house-elf. The beach has since become a mecca for fans, with visitors leaving socks, stones, and other tributes.
While the intention is harmless, the consequences are not:
This quirky example highlights the unpredictable impacts of “film tourism” and the challenges of balancing preservation with pop culture-fueled popularity.
Towards a Positive Development Model
Speaking as a former National Park planning officer and a consultant now working on the other side of the fence....it's not easy. Development within National Parks is not inherently at odds with conservation, but it requires careful, innovative approaches. Here’s a few thoughts on how planners and policymakers might better align development with the parks’ principles:
1. Redefine Conservation
Conservation shouldn’t mean freezing landscapes in time. Instead, it should embrace change that enhances natural and cultural heritage. Eco-tourism projects, rewilding efforts, and sustainable agriculture initiatives can add value while maintaining environmental integrity.
2. Focus on Community
All development must serve the people who live and work in National Parks. From affordable housing for locals to infrastructure that reduces tourism’s footprint, a people-first approach will ensure developments are sustainable in every sense.
3. Plan for Capacity
Over-tourism is a growing problem. Parks must assess their capacity for visitors and implement measures like timed entry, eco-friendly transport, and infrastructure upgrades to prevent strain on their resources.
4. Encourage Proactive Planning
Instead of obstructing development, planners should work with applicants to shape projects that align with park objectives. Collaborative engagement fosters trust and creativity.
I can say that I have experienced both extremes: From a wholly positive approach in the Yorkshire Dales National Park to the opposite only a few miles to the east....
A Call for Change
National Parks are invaluable, not just for their beauty but for the roles they play in ecology, education, and local economies. But as the challenges of climate change, rural depopulation, and over-tourism intensify, we need a shift in mindset.
Instead of asking, “How can we say no?” the question must become, “How can we make this work?”
This requires a more dynamic approach to planning—one that doesn’t just preserve National Parks but enhances them for the future.
As stewards of these landscapes, we owe it to future generations to find better answers.
References
Senior Environmental project manager within the National Environmental Assessment Services at the Environment Agency
2 个月Very thoughtful article with a lot of positives to it, including your proposed development model. However, apart from the rewilding aspect, I’m not sure the model provides sufficient space for conserving / protecting existing wildlife. The landscapes of the national park act as refuges for certain species whose ranges have been curtailed by human intervention. I would like to think your model would recognise this aspect so that we don’t see further reductions.
Assistant Laird
2 个月This proposal is not well supported by Gallovidians and should not go ahead.
?? Keep Your Health Insurance Costs Low | Year After Year | Innovative One Stop Business Protection | Exclusive Packages | Tailored To YOUR Needs ?? ??Howden - Best Healthcare & Wellbeing Consultant | WSB Awards 2024??
3 个月You’ve put a lot of work into this post and it is appreciated ??