Touchless Ordering: The New Benchmark in Planning Systems
In recent months, I've noticed a new term gaining traction among planning software vendors: Touchless Ordering. The concept is simple yet foundational—the recommended orders from your system are placed automatically, without any intervention from planners.
For me, this represents the holy grail of planning. This measure is far more significant than traditional metrics like forecast accuracy. In my experience, achieving a high degree of touchless ordering (+95%) leads to substantial financial benefits, such as dramatic reductions in inventory, improved service levels, and a stable, efficient planning process without the need to intervene with Excel.
HOW TO ACHIEVE TOUCHLESS ORDERING?
However, achieving touchless ordering is no easy feat. It requires a concerted effort in several key areas:
FEWER PLANNERS?
Touchless ordering doesn’t mean fewer planners; it means planners are focused on the right things—keeping your replenishment system finely tuned by continuously reviewing exceptions and addressing the root causes of overstocking or understocking. By doing this, planners ensure that the system remains responsive and accurate. They refine your processes to keep up with the real world.
领英推荐
CONCLUSION
Embarking on the journey to touchless ordering is challenging, but the rewards are significant. Clients who have achieved this level of order adherence unlock the full potential of their planning process—resulting in leaner inventories, better service levels, and a more stable supply chain.
#TouchlessOrdering
#SupplyChainPlanning
Program Purchasing Leader @ Forvia |Strategic Sourcing|MBA in Finance Management|
7 个月Very informative
Great article, Kevin. Concentrating on getting the inputs right means not having to continually change the output, i.e., The Order. I wish people understood that this is your greatest return on effort.
Logistics Systems Engineering at Orizen
7 个月Points 2 and 3 are the key areas Kevin, and the areas, in my experience, where companies have difficulty.
As you know Kevin, with your assistance a number of years ago we achieved this very concept. Results were my planning team spent more time on the data accuracy providing even better results coupled with our supplier partnerships. I think the point being missed is more time for data accuracy results in less touches on ordering. And the balance can be found.
Industrial Engineer (BENG) | Supply Chain Professional (CSCP) | Demand Driven Leader (DDLP) | Lean Practitioner
7 个月Like 'Touchless Ordering', We called it 'Auto Pull'. I like the idea of stable products or parts falling in this category and as soon as reliability/stability metrics aren't met it moves to a category with more planner/specialist intervention.