TOSCA vs Selenium – Which Testing Automation Tool is Right for You in 2024?

In the fast-changing world of technology, it's safe to say that 2023 was a good year for automation and testing. Whether it's QAOps or headless testing, the latest trends in automated testing are growing, and 2024 is expected to be interesting. One main reason is the competition between TOSCA automation and Selenium automated testing is still catching the attention of testing professionals, developers, and QA experts.

In this time of quick technological progress, it's crucial for organizations aiming to deliver flawless software quickly to find the right automation tool. Let's take a closer look at TOSCA and Selenium to help you decide which tool is the best fit for your testing goals in 2024.

TOSCA Automation – Versatile At Its Best

One of the main reasons why TOSCA's popularity soaring is its versatility.? The ability to not be restricted to the cloud-only application makes it much easier to approach developers and testers across industries. TOSCA provides a framework for modeling and orchestrating complex processes, making it suitable for automating the testing of software applications.

Selenium Automated Testing – Frontier of Open-Source Automation

One of the best “features” of Selenium testing, is open-source which makes it best when it comes to testing web applications. However, it does have a drawback in the form of being restricted only to testing cloud-based applications, meaning that no mobile or desktop applications. Since it is an open-source framework, it offers a great range of tools and libraries that enable developers and testers to automate web browser interactions. This enables greater flexibility.

Here are some of the major differences between the two automation tools:

Difference Between TOSCA automation and Selenium automation

TOSCA

Model-Based Testing – TOSCA leverages ML, and AI to create graphical models to simulate the test case and automate the testing process

Scriptless Automation – Since TOSCA uses ML models to automate test cases, devs, and testers can easily design a test case using a graphical interface. Making this optimal for reducing the need for manual coding.

Applications Types – TOSCA is not limited to testing web applications. Meaning, that it supports a wide range of applications, desktops, mobile, and even API testing.

Flexibility – TOSCA supports the creation of reusable test modules, promoting efficiency and maintainability in test automation.

Cross-Execution – Like Selenium, TOSCA supports cross-browser testing, ensuring application compatibility across different browsers.

Non-Technical User – TOSCA’s model-based approach makes it more accessible to non-technical users such as business or market analysts to partake in the test case and refine the testing process.

Reporting and Analysis – TOSCA provides comprehensive reporting and analytics features, facilitating analysis of test results and overall test quality.

Integration (CI/CD) – TOSCA integrates test cases into the CI pipeline to automatically execute tests whenever changes are committed to the version control system. When it comes to deployment, TOSCA uses an automated deployment tool based on the service template.

Selenium

Open Source Testing – Allows users to write, access, and modify the source code as needed.

Programming Language – Unlike a graphical interface, users have to write code for their test cases. Thanks to the support of many programming languages like Java, Python, C#, and Ruby, Selenium boasts its supremacy in flexibility.

Browser Support – Predominately Selenium is used for testing web applications and supports multiple browsers, such as Chrome, Firefox, and Safari.?

Flexibility – Since Selenium is open-source, users can easily extend their testing using third-party frameworks and libraries. Also, it enables devs and testers to create custom functions to adapt to various test case scenarios. This is absent in the TOSCA.

Parallel-Execution – Selenium supports parallel test execution, enabling faster test cycles and improved efficiency.

Technical User – Selenium requires a deeper understanding and knowledge of programming knowledge, which makes it difficult for the non-technical user to collaborate with devs and testers.

Reporting and Analysis – Selenium also excels in the reporting and analysis sector, by providing various reports such as TestNG reports, extend reports, allure reports, and much more.

Integration (CI/CD) – Selenium seamlessly integrates with Continuous Integration (CI) and Continuous Deployment (CD) tools like Jenkins, Travis CI, or GitLab CI, providing automated and scheduled test execution.

?Which Is Better? TOSCA or Selenium?

The answer is, it depends. From its versatility to supporting a wide range of testing applications, TOSCA seems to be the clear winner. But Selenium is more flexible and allows users to integrate a plethora of third-party frameworks into the testing environment. In that perspective, Selenium seems to be a better choice.

The answer to the question ultimately falls under the preference category. Selenium and even manual testing have their advantages and disadvantages, but TOSCA’s features are going the change the testing landscape in the coming years. Even a non-technical user can easily collaborate with the developers and tester, which makes the complex process more intuitive. TOSCA empowers teams to attain thorough and effective testing results through its strong test management, compatibility across different web browsers, integration with CI/CD pipelines, and capabilities for risk-based testing.

With a clear understanding of the project requirement and the team’s expertise, choosing the automation tool can unlock the true potential, and a new level of efficiency, and ultimately achieve the best result possible.