The Top Five Ways Your Annual Plan Will Fail This Year

The Top Five Ways Your Annual Plan Will Fail This Year

It’s annual strategic planning season! Across the globe, teams are piling into meeting rooms on their corporate campuses to map out their key initiatives for next year.

So, with that done, you’ve defined your key objectives for 2018 and built a road-map for execution. All the pieces are in place to succeed. Congratulations!

Unfortunately, chances are high that you’ll fail. Studies show that businesses only accomplish about 33% of the annual goals they set out to achieve each year.

At Afterburner, we are frequently asked to facilitate strategic planning sessions. After supporting these sessions for 22 years, we are constantly on the lookout for the following five pitfalls for any strategic plan. 

These are the top five ways that we’ve seen strategic plans fail:

1. You make the plan too complicated.

Your plan is beautiful. It’s 50 pages long with supporting graphs and diagrams. It considers every possible variable. It’s accompanied by a 100-slide PowerPoint presentation that has the design elements of a Hollywood movie. It’s foolproof, right?

It’s worthless. Your team will not remember the plan 5 minutes after you’ve shared it with them.

As the COO of one of the Fortune 500 tech companies we work with insists, presentations should always be “Sesame Street simple.” This is a man whose entire professional life has been spent working on the cutting edge of emerging technologies, but he knows that his company will need elementary-school simplicity to execute well as a team.

When we build strategic plans with an organization, we ensure that the entire plan is captured in less than ten slides and can be communicated in less than ten minutes. We also insist that the company has no more than three key initiatives at any point in time. 

2. You build it in a vacuum (or worse, you have consultants/experts build it for you).

You’ve hired a small army of impeccably dressed consultants armed with the latest knowledge in market trends and freshly-minted MBA diplomas to build your corporate strategy. They work tirelessly for weeks and at the end, they hand over the “white binder” – a top secret strategy for your company to succeed. 

The only problem: it’s never going to work.

Plans need to be developed with input from the key stakeholders inside your company. When you invite the functional leaders at your corporation into the strategic planning session, several very important things take place:

  • You build alignment with the middle management team that will actually execute your plan.
  • You earn the commitment and accountability of your team members.
  • You get insights that only the team members closest to the action, closest to the customer, closest to the problems can provide.

As fighter pilots, when we planned a mission we would always build the plan with the involvement of the key stakeholders and subject matter experts. We didn’t want an echo chamber of just pilots in the room. We would invite the Intelligence team, the refueling aircraft team – even the weather forecasters to our planning session.

Inviting all the key stakeholders to participate in planning will mean that, as the leader, you will have to work harder to facilitate a constructive and focused discussion. But it will also mean you’ve earned the alignment, commitment and insights of the entire team.

 3. You don’t communicate the plan again and again. And again.

We recently worked with a corporate leader who bemoaned his team’s inability to execute a strategic plan. They were several weeks into the execution phase and few people even remembered what the key initiatives were.

We asked the leader how many times he had briefed the plan to the team. “I brought everyone together for an all-hands - all 1000 employees - and briefed it to them at the start of the year.”

So, he presented it one time. There was the problem.

At Afterburner, one of the reasons we insist that strategic plans can be presented in less than 10 minutes is that the leaders we work with will need to present them over and over again.

How many times is enough? Behavioral scientists have stated that on average human beings need to be told something seven times before they remember it. So instead of being upset that you’ve told them three times already and no one remembers it, think to yourself, “Only four more to go!” Present the plan to the team again and again.

Incorporate the plan into every meeting. Print a poster version of the plan and display it in high traffic areas (like near the bathroom). Over-communicate the plan to ensure everyone hears it and acts on it.

4. You don’t turn the plan into disciplined execution quickly.

At first, everyone is excited and committed to the plan you built together. “This could actually work!” they say. So why has so little been accomplished by the end of the first quarter?

We teach that there are two key ingredients to success: inspired alignment and disciplined execution. Both are required elements of any successful team. The only problem is, the activities that lead to alignment and execution are very different.

Inspired alignment is like the “fuel” needed for the mission execution phase, and it’s a perishable resource. Every day that goes by that you haven’t started accountable execution towards your plan means less alignment to the plan’s steps from your team members. The plan becomes one more “great idea” that never happened, and people go back to working on things by themselves.

Ignite inspired alignment by connecting it to disciplined execution immediately. Create an execution rhythm by establishing short update sessions on the same day and time each week and insist every key stakeholder attend those meetings.

5. You don’t obsessively, aggressively, maniacally control the noise of “everything else”.

We were approached by an individual during the summer of 2016 whose team had performed poorly and his job was on the line. He was the sales leader for a billion-dollar product vertical and they had missed their numbers in the first two quarters of 2016.

We worked closely with his team to build a strategic plan for success. By year-end they were hitting their numbers and have continued to blow out the sales forecasts each quarter since. They’re also a big reason why this tech company’s stock has doubled in the past year. So, what was the secret to his success?

He was able to master the art of saying “No.”

A few weeks into the execution phase of his plan, people began to approach him and say, “Boss, I know we’re working on those three top initiatives you outlined, but surely you still want me to complete work on (fill in the blank).” His answer was the same every time: “No. Work only on the three key initiatives.”

This drove his team members crazy. They had already put work into these projects. They were close to being done! Sometimes these other projects were even ones that the boss had originally asked to be completed. But the leader was able to avoid the “sunk cost fallacy” and stopped work on anything that wasn’t directly related to the critical few initiatives.

In the cockpit of my fighter plane, there were more than 350 instruments and dials. They were all useful for different phases of flight. I could only pay attention to about three different instruments at a time. When I taught new pilots how to fly, I would tell them which instruments to look at. It was called an “instrument crosscheck.”

Your team members need a similar simplified crosscheck to succeed in their roles. Don’t allow the noise of “everything else” to creep back into their work lives.

Build your strategic business plan the right way

Those are the top five ways we’ve seen great strategic plans crash and burn. You spent valuable time and resources to develop the plan – now take the steps to ensure that it stays on track! Avoid the pitfalls outlined above and help your team succeed in 2018.

Thor is the President of Afterburner, a group of fighter pilots, Navy SEALs and other SpecOps members that leverages the leadership development principles of elite military teams to help corporations achieve their Strategic Objectives.

Minerva B.

CFO | Strategic Partnerships | M & A | Investor | Healthcare | Board Director

6 年

This is the best article on strategy I’ve read in the past year. The elegance of a strategic plan that is elementary school simple, centered on three key initiatives, created by/committed to by the team actually charged with executing, and presented at least 7 times to ensure complete alignment of the entire company’s resources can only mean one thing – success! The section where you describe the cockpit resonated with me – the difference between KPIs and critical business levers. In my former life as a mutual fund manager, I successfully followed almost 1,000 companies by focusing on the three critical business levers that would ultimately drive the stock price - not all the data/facts in the company press release or the 10-K! Technology today gives us the ability to harness a massive amount of data, which then allows complex plans with 87 equally important “strategic initiatives” to be created. More often than not, the team is left defeated and depleted because competitors took market share, the bottom line barely budged, the stock stayed flat and no one earned a bonus. Thanks for a great article.

The big thing that is missing is a consideration of the role of technology (not just IT but technology when defined in the broadest possible terms). Technology underpins and properly explains the life-cycle of a business, a nation and indeed our civilisation. Fiddling with finance is, well, simply fiddling. Innovation, given its lack of focus, is no more than taking a punt. Using the military mission as an example the mission will be based on robust Intel about the enemy, their disposition and technical capabilities. A business and a nation are no different and yet 'competitors' technologies and the global technology landscape are ignored in conventional business thinking. This is big issue as all meaningful things happen in the 'technology layer' and they tend to happen many months before these technologies create new markets or impact existing markets. The battle-space is no different. National competitors may jump a generation of technology and you would only know when they deploy assets in the battle-space – all too late. A business, a nation, the military must continuously out-maneuverer competitors in the 'technology layer' to win – that should be the mission and a business strategy will always be a technology strategy. Nations that focus on technology as a ‘competitive’ enabler will generate superior national economic outcomes.

Robert Clarke PMP, P2P

Project Management Professional and PRINCE2 Registered Practitioner with 26 years' ICT experience. Risk Management | Bid Development | Project Planning Delivery and Strategy | Continuous Improvement | DASM | NV1.

6 年

I love that you opened with "your plan is beautiful" ... but.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Joel "Thor" Neeb的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了