Top-Down vs Bottom-Up Budgeting: Which One Should You Use? | FP&A Interview Guide
Asif Masani
CGFPA? Cohort 4 Applications Open | On a Mission to Help 1M Finance pros Master FP&A skills | Author of All About FP&A and From Accounting to FP&A | Udemy Instructor | FP&A Trainer
Most companies build their annual budget using either Top-Down or Bottom-Up approaches. But which one works better?
Should leadership set the targets first, or should every department submit their own plans? And what happens when those Bottoms-Up numbers are way higher than leadership’s top-Down goals?
In this article, I’ll break down the differences, pros and cons, and show you how FP&A can bridge the gap to help build a budget that’s both strategic and realistic.
If you’re preparing for FP&A interviews, this is a must-know topic. Interviewers love to ask how you’d handle budgeting in different scenarios, whether for a startup or a multinational.
What is Top-Down Budgeting?
In Top-Down Budgeting, everything starts at the top.
Leadership sets high-level targets for revenues, profit margins, cost ceilings — based on strategy. These targets are then passed down to departments, who must build their plans within those constraints.
It’s faster and ensures alignment with strategy but can miss operational realities if leadership isn’t in touch with day-to-day challenges.
What is Bottom-Up Budgeting?
Bottom-Up Budgeting starts at the ground level.
Departments and teams create budgets based on what they need be it resources, projects, costs. These are then consolidated into the company-wide budget.
It’s more accurate at the operational level but can lead to inflated budgets if teams add buffers. Without strong guidance, it may also misalign with company strategy.
Key Differences Between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Budgeting
Benefits of Top-Down Budgeting
? Strategic alignment: Supports company-wide goals like growth, profitability.
? Speed: Faster to implement.
? Cost control: Forces upfront discipline.
? Clear accountability: Leadership-driven.
Challenges of Top-Down Budgeting
?? May be unrealistic: If disconnected from operational realities.
?? Low buy-in: Teams may feel it’s forced on them.
?? Less adaptable: Harder to pivot when things change.
Benefits of Bottom-Up Budgeting
? Operational realism: Built from those who know the work.
? Ownership & accountability: Teams are engaged and committed.
? Detailed visibility: Easier to track spending.
? Flexibility: Adjusts better to change.
Challenges of Bottom-Up Budgeting
?? Padding risks: Teams may overstate needs.
?? Slower process: Multiple iterations required.
?? Possible misalignment: May not fit company strategy.
?? Data inconsistency: Hard to consolidate if assumptions vary.
Best Practices: The Hybrid Approach
Most companies blend both approaches using Top-Down for strategic direction and Bottom-Up for operational detail.
Here’s how to structure a hybrid budgeting process:
Communication is key. leadership, FP&A, and teams must align on strategy and reality.
FP&A’s Role in Both Approaches
No matter which method, FP&A sits at the center of budgeting:
In Top-Down:
In Bottom-Up:
In both:
Bonus: How to Answer Common FP&A Interview Questions on Budgeting.
Here are some example responses for popular FP&A interview questions:
1?? Which budgeting approach do you recommend for a fast-growing startup?
Bottom-Up works best. Startups need flexible, detailed budgets as they grow quickly. But a light Top-Down framework helps drive focus. Top-Down alone doesn't work well for startups because leadership may not have enough detailed visibility into fast-changing needs like hiring, product development, or marketing experiments. Startups operate in uncertainty, and teams closest to the action know what resources are truly needed
2?? Which works better in uncertain economic conditions?
Top-Down is better to act quickly and set cost controls. But Bottom-Up is needed to ensure essential spending isn’t cut.
3?? What’s FP&A’s role when leadership sets aggressive Top-Down targets?
FP&A should model different scenarios, highlight risks, and propose realistic alternatives aligning ambition with feasibility.
4?? How do you ensure Bottom-Up budgets are realistic and not inflated?
Set clear guidelines, review assumptions, and use benchmarks to challenge numbers. Hold transparent conversations focused on value, not just cuts.
5?? Can Top-Down and Bottom-Up work together?
Yes! Start with Top-Down targets, let teams build Bottom-Up plans within those guardrails, and have FP&A reconcile the two.
Final Thoughts: Why This Matters
Understanding Top-Down vs Bottom-Up Budgeting isn’t just theory it’s a core FP&A skill that affects how companies plan, spend, and achieve results.
When done right, budgeting isn’t just about numbers. It’s about aligning strategy with reality, and FP&A is at the heart of making that happen.
Take Your FP&A Career to the Next Level with CGFPA?
If you’re serious about building a high-impact FP&A career and want to shorten the learning curve, check out the Certified Global FP&A Professional (CGFPA?) program by the FP&A Professionals Institute (FPI). It’s designed to give you real-world FP&A skills: from building models to presenting to leadership and everything in between. These are lessons they don’t teach you in a typical job
The CGFPA program is designed by CFOs and FP&A industry experts to equip you with:
Here are the Program timelines:
·??????? First Round of Applications close 22nd Feb 2025
·??????? Early Bird Window closes 10th March 2025
·??????? Extended Final Round of Applications close 18th March 2025
·??????? Program Orientation 22nd Mar 2025
·??????? Program Start Date 12th Apr 2025
For more details about the CGFPA Program visit our site here.
Submit your CGFPA Application Form here to check your eligibility
At FP&A Professionals Institute our mission is to help 1 million professionals master finance and FP&A skills. Whether you're a beginner or an experienced professional, we offer comprehensive programs to help you excel.
?? Download Free FP&A Interview Prep Resources – Check the links here
?? Visit www.fpnaprofessionals.com to kickstart your FP&A journey today
If you found this helpful, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to our YouTube channel for regular FP&A insights.
Founding Partner at ECFO - Co-Founder and Managing Director at Decision Modeling Systems Ltd.
6 天前Excellent analysis, Asif! I believe a digital twin FP&A software tool offers practitioners the best of both worlds, seamlessly blending top-down and bottom-up approaches. It A) curbs padding with transparent data, B) identifies bottlenecks in real-time, C) delivers adaptable, robust action plans (as no one can predict the future with certainty, it shines when outcomes deviate), and D) fosters team buy-in through collaborative insights. Additionally, it optimizes resources by aligning them with strategic priorities, effectively bridging high-level vision with granular detail.
Global Finance Leader | Driving Business Growth & Transformation in Global ETO | Schneider Electric | FP&A | Internal Controls & Governance | Problem Solver
1 周Love the clarity here
CGFPA? Cohort 4 Applications Open | On a Mission to Help 1M Finance pros Master FP&A skills | Author of All About FP&A and From Accounting to FP&A | Udemy Instructor | FP&A Trainer
1 周For Free Videos on FP&A Subscribe to our YouTube Channel : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4v8VDEBHJdzZlZEjjUCF5Q?sub_confirmation=1