Top Disadvantages Of OpenAI ChatGPT
Top Disadvantages Of OpenAI ChatGPT
Researchers studying ways to recognize the patterns in machine-generated content have found patterns that appear strange.
One of these issues is the way AI needs help with words.
In the absence of idioms, the content could be an indication that the content was created by a machine and is an element of a detection algorithm.
The inability of idioms to be used is why ChatGPT output needs sound and reads unnaturally.
An artist expressed his opinion on how ChatGPT's output ChatGPT emulates the art form; however, it does not have the actual characteristics of art.
Expression is the process of communicating thoughts, feelings, or thoughts.
ChatGPT output does not include expressions; it's just words.
It cannot create content that affects people emotionally in the same way humans do - since it does not have honest thoughts or emotions.
An article within The Insider quoted an academic who pointed out that academic essays written by ChatGPT do not provide any insight into the subject.
ChatGPT summarises the subject but only provides unique insights into the issue.
However, humans make their knowledge through personal experiences and subjective views.
The Insider quotes Prof. Christopher Bartel of Appalachian State University as saying that although a ChatGPT essay might show high-quality grammar and progressive ideas, it could not convey the correct information.
A research paper published in January 2023 found patterns in ChatGPT's content that make it unsuitable for crucial applications.
The paper's title is How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detection.
The study showed that people prefer answers provided by ChatGPT for more than 50% of the questions about psychology and finance.
However, ChatGPT could not answer medical questions due to humans preferring straightforward answers - which AI couldn't offer.
ChatGPT is a style of writing that isn't just formal but also follows a pattern that gives the text a unique style that isn't just human.
This human quality is evident in how machines and humans answer questions.
The film Blade Runner has a scene that includes a series of questions that reveal whether the person who answers the questions is a person or an alien.
One of the questions is:
"You're watching television. Suddenly you realize a wasp is crawling on your arm. What do you do?"
An average human response would be to say something like they would scream, walk outside and swat it, and so on.
However, when I asked the question to ChatGPT, the chat provider, they provided an extremely well-organized answer that briefly summarized the question and offered logically multiple possibilities - but failed to address the real question.
The solution is highly organized and rational, which gives it an extremely unnatural feeling that is unattractive.
领英推荐
ChatGPT was taught to reward the machine when humans were pleased with the result.
The human raters were more likely to choose answers that contained more information.
However, sometimes, like in medical situations, it is better to have a clear answer than a more comprehensive solution.
This means that the machine must be encouraged to be less extensive and more precise when these qualities are crucial.
The study paper, How Close ChatGPT is with Human Experts? also noted that human communication might have intangible meanings, which require an adjustment in the subject to comprehend its purpose entirely.
ChatGPT has too much literality, causing answers to be sometimes off the mark because the AI needs to pay attention to the real issue.
Humans can better diverge from the literal question, essential for answering “what about” type questions.
For example, if I ask:
“Horses are too big to be a house pet. What about raccoons?”
The above question is not asking if a raccoon is an appropriate pet. The question is about the size of the animal.
ChatGPT focuses on the appropriateness of the raccoon as a pet instead of focusing on size.
ChatGPT's output is generally impartial and instructive. It's an unbalanced output that could appear helpful but only sometimes.
The study we talked about pointed out neutrality as an undesirable quality in medical, legal, and technical issues.
Humans are inclined to choose an opinion when they are asked to express these types of views.
ChatGPT output is prone to bias that stops it from loosening up and responding with standard expressions. Instead, its responses are usually formal.
Humans, however, tend to respond more informally to the language of everyday life and slang, the opposite of formal.
ChatGPT does not employ abbreviations like the GOAT acronym or TL; DR.
The responses also do not contain irony, metaphors, or humor, which can render ChatGPT content too formal for specific content types.
Many issues with ChatGPT make it unfit for unsupervised content generation. It contains biases and fails to create content that feels natural or contains genuine insights.
Additionally, its inability to think or write original thoughts can make it an unsuitable option for creating creative expressions.
Users must follow the prompts in detail to create material superior to the default content it's prone to produce.
Finally, a human-based review of content created by machines is not always sufficient since ChatGPT content is made to appear accurate even if it's not.
It's crucial to ensure that humans are subject experts who know the difference between accurate and incorrect information on a particular subject.
Want some more exciting articles?
Generative AI Specialist
1 年If you like ChatGPT, you should check out #barkyai downloadbarky.com