TOP 8 POINTERS TO REMEMBER BEFORE YOU LET OUT PROPERTY
Many people shift from one city to another for job, for business or for better livelihood. A decent place to live is very important during those times and most of the people prefer rental premises.
While renting a property, parties should be aware about the provision of rent control act of the respective state where the property is situated. The objective of the rent control act is to assure that neither the landlord’s nor the licensees are exploited by other. This article analyses the duties of landlord and failing which landlord may become liable for certain penalties under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 (“Act”).
To ensure a harmonious relationship, parties should explicitly draw out the agreement and establish mutual understanding with respect to rent, security deposits, duration, lock-in period, premises usage, notice period, termination etc. in the written format. ?
?RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF LANDLORD
PENALTY UNDER THE ACT
Any contravention by landlord, he is punishable as under:
Even though the Act does not specifically provide any provisions with respect to lock-in period, generally parties include a lock-in provision in the agreement which then implies that neither party can terminate the agreement during lock-in period unless permitted. Party terminating the agreement during lock in period will have to bear certain consequences like payment of additional amount as a compensation. In addition, the landlord may forfeit the security deposit. However, in case either party makes default or breach any term of the agreement, then the non–breaching party can terminate the agreement even in lock-in period. ?????
Bafna Motors Pvt Ltd vs Amanallua Khan[1]
In this case the issue about arbitrability of disputes related to leave and license agreement was considered. If parties are disputing payment of rent recovery of possession of any immovable property, or relating to the recovery of the licence fee, charges, or rent thereof, then Small Causes Court has exclusive jurisdiction under section 41 of the Act and the dispute is not arbitrable. However, in this case the claims were pertaining to refund of security deposit and claim of damage to equipment etc. which though arose during the course of license agreement did not pertain to recovery of rent or possession of property etc. The licensee had already handed over the possession of the property and also paid the rent. Thus, this dispute was held to be arbitrable and not exclusively restricted to the Small Causes Court.
领英推荐
Mrs. Patricia Lopes vs. Ms. Tarun Bisht and another, eviction application no. 65 of 2020
In this case, applicant was the owner of the licensed premises. The leave and license agreement was executed between applicant and respondents on 01.12.2018 for the term of 3 years i.e., from 01.12.2018 to 30.11.2021. It was contention of the applicant that the respondents were irregular and delayed in making payment of license fee from the month of January 2019. Therefore, the applicant served termination notice dated 10.03.2020 upon the respondents and called upon to handover the possession of the premises. The respondents had agreed to the termination of leave and license agreement and also agreed to vacate the premises on 15.04.2020. Due to the situation of Covid-19 pandemic, the applicant granted additional time to vacate the premises on humanity grounds. The respondents in this period were paying the license fee belatedly. After unlocking 1.0, the respondents had not vacated the premises.
The hon’ble court held that as per Section 24(b) of the Act, failure of the respondents to deliver the possession of the premises to the applicant, shall be liable to pay damages at double the rate of license fee for the delayed possession.
CONCLUSION:
This Act provides protection for licensees against eviction by landlord without cause. Similarly, the landlord can recover possession, if they require the premises for their bona fide purpose. This Act does not apply to any premises belonging to the Government or local authority, Bank or any Public Sector Undertaking or any Corporation established under central or state act.
For any feedback or response on this article, the author can be reached on [email protected].
About Charusheela Vispute, Advocate
Charusheela Vispute is experienced in litigation and non-litigation, having specialisation in property and testamentary matters.?By qualification she is Bachelor of Arts and Bachelor of Law from Mumbai University.???
[1] Bombay High Court: ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.340 OF 2019 on 5th May 2022
NOTE: The article reflects the general work of the author on the date of publication and the views expressed are personal. No reader should act on any statement contained herein without seeking detailed professional advice.??