Too Much to Lose

Too Much to Lose

YouTube? provides endless access to videos about the shadow banking system. Recently I viewed an Oct. 23, 2009, presentation by Darrell Duffie, Distinguished Professor of Management and Finance at Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business. Duffie is ubiquitous when it comes to the discussions on shadow banking. He has written extensively about it, and it is safe to say is held in the highest esteem by his cohort. The title of the presentation is “Failure Mechanics of Dealer Banks.”

Herein lies the problem. When academics are ensconced in the ongoing dialogue it imbues the shadow banking system with an aura of respectability. Like it is deserving of a thorough, thoughtful analysis, when in fact the entire system is insane.

Early on in my book, “Repo Madness: A Simpleton’s Guide to the Street’s Wicked Ways,” I quote Franklin R. Edwards, an economist addressing the Fed’s 1987 annual symposium. He said, “The idea that this system may in some way be seriously flawed is an alien thought. The notion it should be drastically changed shocks us…But the world is changing, and the financial system is no longer working well.”

The problem with Duffie and his ilk is that their discussion and analysis is restricted to within the shadow banking system. Watching the Duffie of 2009, one is struck by his naivete. He says "We need the plumbing, the valves, the pipes, the joints, the tubes –to be very robust, safe-big diameter, to take big gushes of risk, of capital flows without breaking and one of them is not going to bring down the rest.”

“Big gushes of risk?” It is nice in theory, but it is not reality. The so-called plumbing is out of control and beyond the ken of any one person or even institution. Efforts to rein it in have proved futile and yet, the years pass, and the lectures continue. What we are not privy to are the ideas put forth by those who want to scrap the entire system. To implement reforms that are democratic, inclusive, and radical. Why? Because they are silenced. There is too much to lose.?

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Mary Ellen Tuthill的更多文章

  • Time to Make Noise!

    Time to Make Noise!

    Since my last post I have had an “ah ha!” moment. It came on the heels of watching a seven-hour forum on the financial…

  • Duh!

    Duh!

    There’s a lot of unpacking to do when scrutinizing Michael S. Derby’s Sept.

  • Repo & Reform Ignored at Our Peril

    Repo & Reform Ignored at Our Peril

    “Financial stability requires a massive reversal in financial regulatory policy as it has been adopted since the 1990s.…

    1 条评论
  • Skating on the Edge

    Skating on the Edge

    “Absent a debt ceiling, the repurchase market—known as 'repo'—would undergo another deep freeze as it did in 2008 when…

  • The $13 Trillion Market No One Knows About

    The $13 Trillion Market No One Knows About

    What is a $13 trillion market no one knows about? The “repo” or repurchase agreement market. “The idea that this system…

  • Hiding in Plain Sight

    Hiding in Plain Sight

    On May 8, 2023, the New York Fed’s Liberty Street Economics penned an article about the Treasury Markets Practices…

    1 条评论
  • Repo Madness and Wall Street's Wicked Ways

    Repo Madness and Wall Street's Wicked Ways

    “The FHLB..

  • “Repo" is a four-letter word

    “Repo" is a four-letter word

    When it comes to the mainstream press, “repo” is a four-letter word. Now I am going to share the following from a 2009…

    1 条评论
  • Shadow Banking Ensures That If One Falls, They All Will

    Shadow Banking Ensures That If One Falls, They All Will

    “Talk About Moral Hazard!” What amazes me is not the idea that in some quarters there are murmurings of “blanket” FDIC…

  • There is No Elsewhere in the Bank & Financial Crisis

    There is No Elsewhere in the Bank & Financial Crisis

    Would it be that the world worked as CNN business writer, Anna Cooban, maintains in her April 6, 2023 article titled…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了