Too Much Information: Social Media Subverts the Statute of Limitations for Defamation Suits

Too Much Information: Social Media Subverts the Statute of Limitations for Defamation Suits

Over the last few years there have been several cases of professional models suing “gentlemen’s clubs” (a/k/a strip clubs) for defamation. These suits involve the clubs grabbing the models’ pics off the Internet and using them on social media to promote their entertainment. (Weirdly, all of these suits are against strip clubs in New England. Draw your own conclusions.) None of this is particularly surprising. However, one current case has raised the interesting question of when the statute of limitations begins to run on defamation claims stemming from social media posts.?

In this case, five models are suing Club Alex in Stoughton, Massachusetts, alleging the club used their photos in Facebook posts, creating the impression the models worked as dancers there. That’s defamation!?

The club pushed back, noting that the offending posts were made between 2013 and 2015, but the models didn’t bring the lawsuit until 2021 — well after the three-year statute of limitations for defamation claims in Massachusetts had expired. On those grounds, the federal Court hearing the case initially granted the club’s motion to dismiss.?

The models asked the Court to reconsider that decision. And, amazingly, the Court did!?

Why would a federal judge basically admit, “ok, maybe I was wrong”? In a nutshell, here’s why: In some cases, Massachusetts (and most other states) use a “discovery rule” to determine when the statute of limitations starts to run. This avoids the unfairness of having statutes of limitations expire before a “Plaintiff knew or reasonably should have known that she may have been harmed by the conduct of another.” The models argued that this should also apply here because the vast ocean of information on social media meant they didn’t know (and couldn’t be reasonably expected to know) about the misappropriation of their images until years after the the posts. What’s more, even if they had suspected misuse of the images, it’s very difficult to manually search thousands of strip clubs’ social media pages and websites, especially when search engines can’t search images without names.?

Recognizing the models’ point, the District Court sent the issue to the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) of Massachusetts — the highest state Court in that state — asking “under what circumstances, if any, is material publicly posted to social media platforms ‘inherently unknowable’ for purposes of applying the discovery rule in the context of defamation, right of publicity, right to privacy and related tort claims?”?

The SJC held that, in the context of social media posts, a determination of when the statute of limitations begins to run should not be based on the date of publication, but rather “requires a fact-intensive, totality of the circumstances analysis to determine what the Plaintiff knew or should have known about the social media publication.” (It noted that this is not required where postings are widely available and readily searchable).?

The SJC instructed judges faced with this issue to consider things like: “how widespread the distribution was;” whether the posting could be readily located by a search; if there is technology that could assist in locating potentially offending posts; and how widely the images are distributed and, thus, how hard or easy it is to separate authorized uses from unauthorized uses.?

Here, this means that the models can continue to pursue their defamation claims against the club.?

A final thought: In a way, this is the flipside of the Netflix case involving their series Baby Reindeer and the lawsuit against them by Fiona Harvey, which I wrote about here. In that case, the information on social media enabled Internet sleuths to out someone whose identity was meant to be concealed, whereas in this case, the volume of information on social media makes it more difficult to find out when someone’s persona is being used without their knowledge. Whichever way you look at it, one thing is certain: Controlling our identities (and our lives) is waaay harder than it used to be.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Emily Poler的更多文章

  • Scrape Away! Social Media Posts and Web Scraping

    Scrape Away! Social Media Posts and Web Scraping

    I’ve written a number of posts about data scraping because it’s a big deal right now. Initially, I was interested in…

    3 条评论
  • A Hint of How AI Infringement Suits Will Go?

    A Hint of How AI Infringement Suits Will Go?

    A Hint of How AI Infringement Suits Will Go? As the lawyers reading this know, media giant Thomson Reuters has a…

  • Get Ready: DeepSeek is Here

    Get Ready: DeepSeek is Here

    And this week, it’s DeepSeek. Every few days it seems there’s something new dominating tech headlines, and since right…

  • Business Development Basics: Choose Your Path, Find Your People

    Business Development Basics: Choose Your Path, Find Your People

    As you know, I’m interested in business development and am always looking to learn more. In search of new ideas and…

    1 条评论
  • A Losing (Trademark) Defense Against Penn State

    A Losing (Trademark) Defense Against Penn State

    I talk a lot about trademarks here, but do you know exactly what one is? Well, according to the United States Trademark…

  • Perplexity and the Perplexing Legalities of Data Scraping

    Perplexity and the Perplexing Legalities of Data Scraping

    Of the many lawsuits media giants have filed against AI companies for copyright infringement, the one filed by Dow…

  • Happier Life, Better Business

    Happier Life, Better Business

    The year is drawing to a close, which means I’m looking back on the good and the bad of 2024 and trying to focus…

  • OpenAI’s Texts and DMs: Business or Personal?

    OpenAI’s Texts and DMs: Business or Personal?

    If you’ve been following this blog, you’re familiar with the copyright infringement cases the New York Times and the…

  • IP in a Partnership: Who Owns What?

    IP in a Partnership: Who Owns What?

    I talk a lot here about aspects of intellectual property law. It’s an area I find pretty fascinating because it has to…

    2 条评论
  • Digging Through Yesterday to Plan for Tomorrow

    Digging Through Yesterday to Plan for Tomorrow

    First, a disclaimer: bear with me on this one. Even though I start off with descriptions of the various offices I’ve…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了