Too Close to Call?

Too Close to Call?

No alt text provided for this image
US Senate still does not have a true majority party

We are now a week out of the election without a clear understanding of which party will control which chambers of the congress.

Prevailing sentiment is that the Senate will be controlled by the Democrats with one run off election left to be held. The Senate's makeup is essentially the same as it was last year.

No alt text provided for this image
No one has reached a majority of seats in the House either.

On the House of Representatives side it is likely that the Republicans will be in control. Again however that is yet to be called officially. Regardless of the final counts such a slim majority of leadership in either chamber shows that there is not a clear statement of the country's sentiments being aligned with one side party or the other. This once again shows that there is not a party mandate. Just like we discussed as this whole thing began -

Once you watch it play out in state houses and local races you quickly see even more razor thin margins between the candidates - including races that are tied going into week two of counting. The question this all brings up however is - why does everything seem "too close to call?"

Understanding the Districts

Each state is in charge of drawing their own districts. That responsibility is further designated to the counties, municipalities and special districts. While there are many different methodologies employed to design those districts they follow a few very common patterns:

  1. They follow the guidelines of the Voting Rights Act
  2. They try to provide representation to all communities in the district
  3. They try to keep "like communities" connected in districts
  4. They try to preserve control

Now that last one isn't official, but anyone looking at the outcome of the past series of elections can see that there is very little shift in control of seats that occurs when new districts are drawn.

Regardless, we just finished the first set of elections under these districts, so now is the time to invest in understanding the districts, their demographics, the trends leading into these districts, and the efforts around the region that could shift those demographics.

The Trap of Culture

Everything has become a political act. Anyone who has opened social media or seen a news report realizes how over politicized everything has become. Politics has become inescapable, and as such partisanship has seeped into areas it doesn't belong.

One of the local radio stations in Southern California has a regular bit called "How Long Until Political" which takes seemingly mundane social media posts and the show hosts try to guess how long until someone makes the post political.

Spoiler alert - it is always very quickly. And that's how everything is right now.

The hosts do a great job of pointing out how absurd it is that these posts go political, and it really is fun to see them deconstruct these incidents. None the less it speaks volumes that it is relatable enough to become a morning drive time show staple.

The current state of culture where everything becomes a political confrontation, and people seeing everything as a political act means that we are going to line up on sides and do what we can to promote "our side."

Data Is In Charge

Campaigning has changed. Signs, events, flyers, and walking precincts used to be the way candidates got to know their constituents. There was a chance to interact with the candidates and their supporters all over the place. They were more human, and as such not as hate-able.

Campaign efficiency doesn't waste its time with such quaint antiquities anymore. Using voter rolls, consumer data, statistical analyses, polling, and messaging experts candidates tailor their campaigns to focus on getting out to only those individuals who are high-propensity voters - issues based voters - or fundraising sources. And the data available can micro-target the message/ pitch/ invite/ get out the vote effort specifically to only those candidates that fit a certain profile that supports that candidate's intents.

Meaning the casual voter doesn't get the level of contact with the candidates that they used to - and this level of campaigning furthers the echo chambers of those individuals they try to connect with.

The impact of this is these elections where only a sliver of individuals that were guaranteed to vote are communicated with - and as such calculated so closely that each side reaches out to the right groups of individuals to turn out and vote for that candidate.

The campaign tactics produce just enough votes to win - which makes the results razor thin.

We Are to Blame

Each year voters complain about the candidates, the lack of choices and how they do not represent their ideas. All very valid criticisms - except...

  • How many of us know who our elected officials are?
  • How many of us know who the candidates for office are?
  • How many of us know what any of them stand for?
  • How many of us actually reach out to the candidates to learn about them?
  • How many of us take the mail that fills our mailboxes and dump it in the trash?
  • How many of us expect the candidates to come to us?

On the other side -

  • How many candidates are reaching out beyond their set list of "likely voters"?
  • How many candidates hold open hours to meet with constituents?
  • How many candidates look beyond their own "natural universes" to find support?

There is a lot we can do on both sides of these elections. But the reason that everything has become such narrow victories is because of the conditions we have placed ourselves, and the way in which campaigns can reach maximum efficiency.

The models work, but they aren't working for the democracy we deserve. Community members need to reach out to candidates as much as candidates need to look "beyond their base" when they are running for office.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Chip Ahlswede的更多文章

  • Knott the Way Forward for Buena Park's Housing

    Knott the Way Forward for Buena Park's Housing

    To read this article at the AAOC website please CLICK HERE Walter and Cordelia Knott knew they had something special…

    1 条评论
  • Is Public Opinion on Rent Control Shifting?

    Is Public Opinion on Rent Control Shifting?

    By now you know that AAOC filed a lawsuit against the city of Santa Ana over their rent control laws. By the time you…

    1 条评论
  • No Speaker No Cry

    No Speaker No Cry

    The first question posed by the new staff orientation when I worked for the house was - "What is the purpose of…

    2 条评论
  • Why Are We Waiting???

    Why Are We Waiting???

    Election results seem fairly simple to report, especially in modern times. Just look around the world this year alone:…

    5 条评论
  • Voting is Important - So is Perspective

    Voting is Important - So is Perspective

    Two very important truths - Today is election day, and tomorrow the sun is still going to rise. After seeing the…

  • How to Not Screw Up An Important Online Meeting...

    How to Not Screw Up An Important Online Meeting...

    Today I hopped on a webinar with Doug Devitre to discuss how associations can become more impactful if they master the…

    1 条评论
  • Keeping Sight of YOU

    Keeping Sight of YOU

    Entering an engagement recently I was asked to sign my name to an initiative that: Addressed every leader of this…

    1 条评论
  • Celebrate Your Small Victories

    Celebrate Your Small Victories

    You'll be surprised how powerful they really are..

    2 条评论
  • Provide Meaning - Protect Believing

    Provide Meaning - Protect Believing

    One of the most unique leaders I've worked with has posed a haunting question - What is the "why" we provide? Everyone…

  • 3 Levels of Board Efficiency

    3 Levels of Board Efficiency

    What are you doing to ensure the decisions that are made - are made for the right interest? According to the IRS the US…

    12 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了