Title: “Advances in Nanomaterial-Enhanced Biosensors for Organophosphorus Pesticide Detection: Synthesis, Characterization, and Applications"
Author: Dr. Sreelatha Gaddam
Abstract
This review article provides a comprehensive overview of biosensors for the detection of organophosphorus pesticides, focusing on their synthesis, characterization, applications, and results. Organophosphorus pesticides, widely used in agriculture, pose significant health and environmental risks, necessitating efficient detection methods. The review examines various types of biosensors, including enzyme-based, electrochemical, optical, and piezoelectric systems.
The synthesis of nanoparticles and nanocomposites for biosensor applications is discussed, highlighting materials such as Fe3O4/silica core/shell nanocomposites, CaCO3-CdSe/ZnS/silica composites, and Au nanocrystals. Characterization techniques for these nanomaterials and their integration into biosensor platforms are explored.
Applications of biosensors in environmental monitoring, food safety, and clinical diagnostics are presented, with a focus on their ability to detect organophosphorus pesticides at low concentrations. The review compares the performance of different biosensor types, noting that some electrochemical biosensors have achieved detection limits as low as 1 × 10^-11 μM2.
Results from various studies are synthesized, showcasing the sensitivity, selectivity, and response times of different biosensor configurations. The review also addresses challenges in biosensor development, such as improving detection limits and expanding the range of detectable pesticides.
This comprehensive review aims to provide researchers and practitioners with a thorough understanding of the current state of biosensor technology for organophosphorus pesticide detection, highlighting recent advances and identifying areas for future research and development. Utilization of biosensors detection of pesticides in US projects, offering rapid, sensitive and cost-effective methods for monitoring pesticide levels in various environments.
Introduction
Organophosphorus pesticides (OPs) have been widely used in agriculture to protect crops and increase yields5. However, their extensive use has led to significant health and environmental risks, necessitating the development of efficient and sensitive detection methods6,8. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of biosensors for the detection of OPs, focusing on their synthesis, characterization, applications, and results.
The increasing concern over OP contamination in food and water sources has driven research into rapid, sensitive, and cost-effective detection methods. Biosensors have emerged as promising tools for OP detection due to their high sensitivity, selectivity, and potential for on-site analysis9. This review examines various types of biosensors, including enzyme-based, electrochemical, optical, and piezoelectric systems, highlighting their unique advantages and limitations.
Schematic diagram of typical biosensor consisting of bioreceptor, transducer, electronic system (amplifier and processor), and display (PC or printer) and various types of bioreceptors and transducers used in the biosensors are also shown.
?
1.???? Biosensor Types and Working Principles
1.1. Enzyme-Based Biosensors
Enzyme-based biosensors, particularly those utilizing acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and organophosphate hydrolase (OPH), have been extensively studied for OP detection. These biosensors rely on the inhibition of AChE by OPs or the hydrolysis of OPs by OPH1. The degree of enzyme inhibition or the rate of hydrolysis is correlated with the OP concentration, allowing for quantitative analysis.3
??? ??1.2. Electrochemical Biosensors
Electrochemical biosensors offer advantages such as high sensitivity, rapid response, and potential for miniaturization. These biosensors typically employ amperometric, potentiometric, or conductometric transduction methods9. Recent advancements have led to the development of electrochemical biosensors capable of detecting OPs at concentrations as low as 1 × 10^-11 μM2.
????? 1.3. ?Biosensors
Optical biosensors, including colorimetric, fluorescent, and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) based systems, provide visual or spectroscopic detection of OPs. These biosensors often incorporate nanomaterials to enhance sensitivity and signal amplification1.
1.4. Piezoelectric Biosensors
Piezoelectric biosensors2, such as those based on quartz crystal microbalance (QCM), offer label-free detection of OPs. These systems measure changes in resonance frequency caused by mass changes on the sensor surface due to OP binding or enzyme inhibition4.
Biosensors for pesticide detection can be classified based on their biorecognition elements and transduction methods. Below flow chart explains the comprehensive classification of biosensors used for pesticide detection.
2.???? Synthesis and Characterization of Nanomaterials for Biosensors
The integration of nanomaterials has significantly enhanced biosensor performance. This review discusses the synthesis of various nanoparticles and nanocomposites, including:
2.1. Fe3O4/silica core/shell nanocomposites
2.2. CaCO3-CdSe/ZnS/silica composites1
2.3. Au nanocrystals
These nanomaterials are characterized using techniques such as transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and dynamic light scattering (DLS) to determine their size, morphology, and surface properties7.
3.???? Applications and Results
Biosensors for OP detection find applications in:
3.1. Environmental monitoring
3.2. Food safety analysis
3.3. Clinical diagnostics
Recent studies have demonstrated impressive detection limits and wide linear ranges for various OPs. For instance, some electrochemical biosensors have achieved detection limits as low as 1 × 10^-11 μM2. Optical biosensors based on surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) have shown promise in multiplex detection of different OPs simultaneously12.?? In food safety applications, biosensors have been successfully employed to detect OP residues in fruits, vegetables, and water samples. The rapid analysis time and potential for on-site testing make these biosensors particularly attractive for regulatory compliance and quality control9.
4.???? Challenges and Future Directions
Despite significant progress, several challenges remain in biosensor development for OP detection:
4.1. Improving long-term stability of biological recognition elements
4.2. Enhancing selectivity in complex matrices
领英推荐
4.3. Developing multi-analyte detection systems
4.4. Miniaturization and integration with portable devices
Future research is suggested to focus on addressing these challenges and exploring new biorecognition elements, such as aptamers and molecularly imprinted polymers, to further improve biosensor performance13.
Enzyme-Based Biosensors 14
·?????? Cholinesterase (ChE) inhibition-based biosensors
?1. Primarily detect organophosphate and carbamate insecticides
·?????? Photosynthetic system II inhibition biosensors
·?????? Alkaline phosphatase-based biosensors
·?????? Cytochrome P450A1-based biosensors
·?????? Peroxidase-based biosensors
·?????? Tyrosinase-based biosensors
·?????? Laccase-based biosensors
·?????? Urease-based biosensors
·?????? Aldehyde dehydrogenase-based biosensors
Biosensors for pesticide detection are being actively developed and utilized in several US projects, offering rapid, sensitive, and cost-effective methods for monitoring pesticide levels in various environments. Here are some key applications and developments:
1.???? USDA-Supported Nanostructured Biosensor: Dr. Jonathan Claussen and his team at Iowa State University have created a flexible, low-cost, and disposable biosensor for detecting pesticides in soil15. This graphene-based biosensor provides instantaneous feedback, allowing farmers to quickly assess pesticide levels in the field. The project, supported by USDA's National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), aims to help farmers optimize pesticide use and minimize environmental damage.
2.???? Multi-Enzyme Biosensor for Real-Time Pesticide Screening: A project funded by the USDA is developing a disposable test strip that can monitor pesticide levels on-site in soils within minutes using a portable electrochemical reader16. This multi-enzyme biosensor utilizes ink-jet printed nanoparticles for enhanced sensitivity and rapid detection.
3.???? EPA-Funded Portable Biosensor: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has supported research on a portable, low-powered amperometric biosensor for detecting organophosphorus and carbamate pesticides in water17. This project aims to develop field-deployable technology for environmental monitoring.
4.???? Nanomaterial-Enhanced Biosensors: Recent advances in nanomaterial-based biosensors have improved sensitivity and reliability in pesticide detection18. These biosensors utilize various nanomaterials such as gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and quantum dots (QDs) to enhance detection capabilities in food matrices, ensuring consumer food safety.
?5.???? Smartphone-Integrated Biosensors: Researchers have developed biosensors that can be integrated with smartphones for pesticide detection18. For example, a lateral flow immunoassay (LFI) biosensor using MoS2 nanosheets can detect multiple pesticides simultaneously in various food samples, with results readable through a smartphone app.
?These biosensor projects demonstrate the US commitment to developing rapid, sensitive, and field-deployable technologies for pesticide detection. They offer potential improvements in environmental monitoring, food safety, and agricultural management by providing real-time data on pesticide levels in soil, water, and food samples.
?Conclusion:
This review has provided a comprehensive overview of biosensors for OP detection, highlighting recent advances in synthesis, characterization, and application. The field of biosensors for organophosphorus pesticide detection has witnessed significant advancements, driven by the integration of nanomaterials, innovative biorecognition elements, and novel transduction methods. These developments have resulted in highly sensitive and selective detection platforms, with some electrochemical biosensors achieving detection limits as low as 1 × 10^-11 μM. The application of these biosensors spans environmental monitoring, food safety, and clinical diagnostics, offering rapid and on-site analysis capabilities. While challenges persist in areas such as long-term stability, multi-analyte detection, and performance in complex matrices, ongoing research continues to address these issues. US-based projects, supported by agencies like the USDA and EPA, are at the forefront of developing field-deployable biosensor technologies. The integration of biosensors with smartphones and the development of disposable test strips further enhances their practical applicability. As research progresses, biosensors are poised to play a pivotal role in ensuring food safety, environmental protection, and public health by providing efficient and sensitive detection of organophosphorus pesticides. The future of pesticide monitoring looks promising, with continued improvements in sensitivity, selectivity, and user-friendliness expected to further revolutionize the field.
References:
1. Won, Yu-Ho, Purdue University Proquest Dissertations & Thesis, 2011. Synthesis and characterization of nanoparticles for electrochemical biosensor applications.
2. Pundir CS, Malik A, Preety. Bio-sensing of organophosphorus pesticides: A review. Biosens Bioelectron. 2019 Sep 1;140:111348. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111348. Epub 2019 May 24. PMID: 31153016.
3.Mulyasuryani, A. and Dofir, M. (2014) Enzyme Biosensor for Detection of Organophosphate Pesticide Residues Base on Screen Printed Carbon Electrode (SPCE)-Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA). Engineering, 6, 230-235. doi: 10.4236/eng.2014.65027.
4. Marrazza G. Piezoelectric biosensors for organophosphate and carbamate pesticides: a review. Biosensors (Basel). 2014 Sep 9;4(3):301-17. doi: 10.3390/bios4030301. PMID: 25587424; PMCID: PMC4264360.
5. Ramesh M, Janani R, Deepa C, Rajeshkumar L. Nanotechnology-Enabled Biosensors: A Review of Fundamentals, Design Principles, Materials, and Applications. Biosensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 27;13(1):40. doi: 10.3390/bios13010040. PMID: 36671875; PMCID: PMC9856107.
6. Jasvir Kaura and Prabhat K. Singh ORCID logo, Enzyme-based optical biosensors for organophosphate class of pesticide detection; Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020,22, 15105-15119.
8. Hassani S, Momtaz S, Vakhshiteh F, Maghsoudi AS, Ganjali MR, Norouzi P, Abdollahi M. Biosensors and their applications in detection of organophosphorus pesticides in the environment. Arch Toxicol. 2017 Jan;91(1):109-130. doi: 10.1007/s00204-016-1875-8. Epub 2016 Oct 19. PMID: 27761595.
9.Dhull V, Gahlaut A, Dilbaghi N, Hooda V. Acetylcholinesterase biosensors for electrochemical detection of organophosphorus compounds: a review. Biochem Res Int. 2013;2013:731501. doi: 10.1155/2013/731501. Epub 2013 Dec 9. PMID: 24383001; PMCID: PMC3872028.
10. Naresh V., Lee N.A. Review on biosensors and recent development of nanostructured materials-enabled biosensors. Sensors. 2021;21:1109. doi: 10.3390/s21041109.?[DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Audrey Sassolas, Beatriz Prieto-Simón, Jean-Louis Marty, Biosensors for Pesticide Detection: New Trends Laboratoire IMAGES EA 4218, Université de Perpignan via Domitia, Perpignan, France. Nanobioengineering Group, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia, Barcelone, Spain. DOI: 10.4236/ajac.2012.33030
13. Pallavi Chaudhari, Lai-Kwan Chau*Loan Thi NgoTing-Chou ChangYi-Ling ChenKuang-Tse Huang*, Competitive Assay for the Ultrasensitive Detection of Organophosphate Pesticides Based on a Fiber-Optic Particle Plasmon Resonance Biosensor and an Acetylcholinesterase Binding Peptide, Sept 19,2023; Analytical chemistry vol.95/Issue39.? ACS publications.
14. ?Bucur B, Munteanu FD, Marty JL, Vasilescu A. Advances in Enzyme-Based Biosensors for Pesticide Detection. Biosensors (Basel). 2018 Mar 22;8(2):27. doi: 10.3390/bios8020027. PMID: 29565810; PMCID: PMC6022933.
15. Selina Meiners, Nanostructured Biosensors Detect Pesticide, Help Preserve Environment, November 30, 2016. https://www.usda.gov/about-usda/news/blog/nanostructured-biosensors-detect-pesticide-help-preserve-environment.
16. Project Director, Claussen, J. C.; Program code: [A1511]- Agriculture Systems and Technology: Nanotechnology for Agricultural and Food Systems, https://portal.nifa.usda.gov/web/crisprojectpages/1009251-development-of-a-multi-enzyme-biosensor-with-ink-jet-printed-nanoparticles-for-real-time-multi-pesticide-screening-in-the-field.html. Nov 30, 2020.
17. Cart er, Michael T.,Title: Biosensor for Field Monitoring of Pesticides in Water;Project Period: May 1, 2006 through April 30, 2008;
18. Mirres, A.C.d.M.; Silva, B.E.P.d.M.d.; Tessaro, L.; Galvan, D.; Andrade, J.C.d.; Aquino, A.; Joshi, N.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Recent Advances in Nanomaterial-Based Biosensors for Pesticide Detection in Foods. Biosensors 2022, 12, 572. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12080572.