Is "Tired of Trying" an Excuse Not to Innovate?
Ray Stasieczko
Consultant/Speaker/Interviewer and Host of End Of The Day With Ray! CEO/Founder
Is “Tired of Trying†an Excuse Not to Innovate?
I was talking with a friend the other day and realized just how infectious complacency is within organizations that stifle ideas and squash team members’ enthusiasms. These organizations have pushed their best asset -- their people -- into what I call the “Tired of Trying Zone.â€
It seems anymore that all organization large or small believe they are innovative, cutting edge or some other tired phrase. The reality is innovative organizations are not the norm, and most organization won’t get out of their own way. The very essence of the term “innovative organization†means its people are innovative. So why is it that organizations spend more time deciding how not to do something than doing something? When you look at technology-born organizations, such as Facebook, Google or Netflix, the companies born after the 1990s, you see a stark difference in how the work force feels toward innovative thinking. Here’s why
“The organizations born from technology realize their very existence was created by innovation, and that someone else can at the speed of light innovate them out of business. “
Frankly it’s disturbing to see great people so disgusted with their organization’s attitude toward innovations they simply stop trying. Some reading this will say it’s their own fault; they should quite go somewhere and be appreciated. I must admit I think that way most of the time, as well. However, sometimes current life circumstances make that decision much more complicated for some.
So let’s blame the leadership, After all, if these leaders instead searched for better ways, they would welcome new ideas instead of slamming the door. They would force their lower-level managers to explore better ways, not simply manage older ways. Some organizations are so focused on “the way it is,†because they are only compensated on “the way it is.†What if organizations actually compensated their people to not only manage “what it is,†but also imagine what it could be?
I believe it’s time for the imagination bonus plan. Come on, leaders. Use your imagination and develop a program that rewards the team to think of ways to innovate. Then those great people won’t utter that dreadful commentary, “We’ll never do that,†or “We take forever to do something different,†or “I’m not going to say anything; it’s useless.â€
In today’s changing world, organizations must invest the time and resources in addressing the way it’s going to be. The RD departs of the past move too slowly and usually carry the weight of outdated policies. It’s time that legacy organizations innovate their policies and their attitudes about how they look for and bring back the future - allowing them to prosper even more today.
Everyone that works in the company should also be members of the R&D department. The amount of information available today is staggering. Today’s leaders must figure out how to manage an overload of ideas from their teams, instead of following outdated management practices that teach teams not to care.
In closing; to leaders who believe their team cares about the company’s future more than a pay check, you’re delusional. That is, unless you’re at leader who actually pays the team to look to the future. If you’re one of those organizations, kudos to you.
“Compliments are the nourishment for a repeating of what was complimented.â€
R.J. Stasieczko
N/A
8 å¹´Is a lack of innovation as simple as management rejecting new ideas? It seems to be a blanket stereotype... but I don't know. Every company in which I have worked (as opposed to supported as a consultant) has had departments for new designs - I can't remember them being called innovation. When we look around we see mobile phones and computers being fitted with larger screens, more pixels, bigger memories and faster chips and software that does a thousand things most folk will not use. Is this innovation or just "more"? My experience, as an improvement consultant, is to encourage folk to find issues and come up solutions. However, not all solutions are cost effective and most suggestions are small, local improvements but some are product related. Such a culture permeates back up the management tree. Even so, if a company is successful and has products that sell, they do always think in terms of new products - as opposed to rejecting ideas. Bigger projects, like process mapping, can identify opportunities to speed up existing production. Better productivity increases profits and provides funding for innovation programs. I remember one organization that would try out any idea a customer would ask for - at a huge cost - with no consideration as to whether or not the idea will sell. So, innovation projects should be considered and costed. Disruptive leaps in technology are not predictable and development of ideas take time to perfect. Bigger companies, with funding, already have R&D sections. Some also work with universities. But there is often a huge cost to running R&D departments. Finding new drugs, for example, or even common issues like more battery power can be limitations... And problems can cost billions. Yet, is it fair to say the answer is simple? Is it as easy as regular new product development meetings with tools like SWOT analysis to see if and how new technology can be used to your advantage or against you. New product development must be taken seriously, with time, resources and budgets and, it goes without saying, that we should not be waiting till the sales of products fall off before looking for new ones. Steve
President/Founder at Tracy Neal & Company LLC
8 å¹´hmmmm
Experienced VP of Customer Service
8 å¹´Excellent article Ray!
CEO Basketball NSW, Experienced Non-Executive Director
8 å¹´Hi Ray Thank you for sharing this. I believe you have highlighted an issues organisations grapple with. However, from my experience what you are describing is a leadership issue. This is coupled to the High Performing Mindset Model I encourage organisations to embrace. When you encourage people to be innovative and innovate while recognising their contribution you do get a more engaged workforce. People are people at the end of the day and if the leadership believe the money is the only driver for people to get up in the morning I think as you said we are sadly mistaken. People work harder and more efficient as well as being more innovative when they feel they are being recognised for their efforts and feel they are contributing to the organisational outcomes. Thank you Ray