The Gatekeeper Role -- Essential to Data Accuracy

The Gatekeeper Role -- Essential to Data Accuracy

Gatekeeper Validates Incoming Work and Completed Work

Gatekeeping is the process of controlling information (the work request) as it moves through the gate. Gatekeeping in the context of a CMMS is a process through which information is filtered, refined and validated by a representative group (i.e. it could be a call center). In addition, this role may perform an approval process based on feasibility and cost. Further, this role can evaluate for risk and shutdown requirements.

Gatekeeper Role in Support of Planning/Scheduling

Gatekeeper applies lead craft and rough estimate. This process enables automatic resource leveling of the backlog. Thus, if you had 700 work orders in the backlog, a resource leveled output would tell the planners exactly what they need to plan (to support the creation of a weekly schedule).

No alt text provided for this image

The Review Procedure

  • From gatekeeper start center, review all new work created since last review.
  • Assess level of urgency; dispatch as required.
  • Assign Lead Craft
  • Apply a rough estimate to new repair work. Note: The PM/PdM work should already be planned - including modification work. If not, send message to planners.
  • Ascertain if this work should be coded as functional failure.
  • Evaluate if this work can be done with plant/facility operating or requires a scheduled shutdown or can be worked with plant on-line. Code accordingly.
  • Check for duplicate work, or, "is this work feasible". Cancel if appropriate.
  • If this is contractor work, then code job as "CONTRACTOR", and identify the "type of work", e.g. electrical, HVAC.
  • Assess risk level; enter risk level against WO. High risk work should be monitored by Safety Manager. {See expanded story below.}
  • Assess environmental, safety, and regulatory flags. If this activity warrants, flag Safety Manager to be present during job.
  • Assess Management of Change (MOC) requirement, which if checked Yes, would require additional routing & approval.
  • Place WO on Hold if “more information is required” and route as required.
  • Verify all WO data entered as correct. Double-check asset number, location, asset problem code, and problem description, i.e. does it describe the problem?.
  • If any information is not clear, document WO quality in grading sheet.
  • Change status to indicate gatekeeper role is complete, e.g. REVIEWED. Route to next step in process.

Goal: The entire backlog should have either a formal or rough estimate. This helps perform backlog size trending by craft.

Some Reviews Require Analysis of Process and Data

Below are more examples of what a gatekeeper to do:

No alt text provided for this image

Could This Worker Injury Have Been Prevented with Proper Coding?

Below is a story of an industrial accident that involved equipment failure and serious personnel injury. ANO 1 ACCIDENT – DROPPED STATOR At 0750 [CDT] on 3/31/2013, during movement of the Unit 1 Main Turbine Generator Stator (~500 tons), the Unit 1 turbine temporary lift device failed. One person was killed and eight others injured. According to Entergy, the old stator of Unit One's generator fell during an operation to replace it. When it collapsed, the beams of the crane bent and fell. One of the beams struck a worker. He was an iron worker subcontracted for the project at Arkansas Nuclear One in Russellville. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration cited four companies involved for nearly 30 violations between them, with fines of $175,000. My only point here is, if the Safety Manager was present, would he have noticed unsafe condition/operation where workers were directly below the crane path (although in basement below) in anticipation of temporary lifting device failure?

This is the importance of work order management and proper hazard assessment which might initiate with the gatekeeper review.

John Reeve

Book author, CRL, CMM and CMMS champion.

9 年

Thank you Terry - and IDCON

回复
Terry Taylor CMRP PE

Taylor Reliability Consulting

9 年

Great article John! You have described one of the more important responsibilities of what we call an "Operations Maintenance Coordinator" (OMC). The OMC is the designated "Gatekeeper" in their role as the liaison between Operations and Maintenance. The OMC reviews all work requests for the same content and disposition as you have described. Should someone need to be consulted with concerning a particular work request, the OMC makes that call. Thus the need for a formal meeting between O&M personnel to review all work requests is not necessary. The OMC plays a key role in the success of any organization that has a focus on good Planning and Scheduling practices.

回复
John Reeve

Book author, CRL, CMM and CMMS champion.

9 年

spot on Kirby. ...well stated.

回复
Kirby Erickson, CRL

Planning & Scheduling Supervisor Communication,Collaboration & Consistency

9 年

I would go further in stating that this meeting is the single most important meeting of the day in our process. Securing representatives from all key departments is critical for input and decision making. We call our morning meeting POD, or Plan of the Day... We pin the role of 'Gatekeeper' on the highest level Operation's Division representative because they know the current plant running performance and operational requirments to send out the most reliable cost effective product we can. We assign this in a semi-permanent role and this 'Gatekeeper' speaks for all of Operations to avoid special systems issues or play the system ownership favorites game. Our Gatekeeper pushes emergent, sponsored or breakin work into the locked down work week as well. All other new work is assigned a planning date and sent to the Planning Department. The Gatekeeper's peers in Maintenance and Engineering move work forward to planners based on Asset Criticality, priority (including Safety and Environmental issues) and condition requirements. Our Supply Chain representative can make on the spot verifications of materials and expected promise dates to further support schedule planning and or scheduling dates.

回复
John Reeve

Book author, CRL, CMM and CMMS champion.

9 年

Craig Tallar and Ian R. have added some real-world points to this discussion which is making me think harder (...if possible). Let’s state some assumptions: A. The PM/PdM program has been reviewed and optimized as to ideal strategy. B. The Daily Review meeting has proper attendance from Ops, Maint, Engr, HSE – and Planner/Scheduler. C. There is a previously prepared Weekly Schedule “set of work”, created last week (for this week), which in turn drives the Daily Plan creation. D. The Weekly Schedule meeting has/had both Ops and Maintenance representatives in attendance. Thus, they acknowledged the work scope. E. The Planner/Scheduler (who runs the morning meeting) must be multi-talented, meaning he has plant experience, job planning knowledge, AMS software knowledge, and people negotiation skills. Somewhere in that mix, he must not be shy about asking questions. Let’s review the possible problems: (1) If the work being discussed is already part of the Weekly Schedule work set, but Ops says, “..not today”…. (2) If this is new break-in work (which was not on Weekly Schedule) …. (3) The work being placed on the Daily Plan (from the Weekly Schedule) is “not ready for work start” or not fully planned.... The above 3 problems need to be discussed as a team and process solutions found - perhaps in a separate meeting. Also, if the above stated assumptions are not in place, then these too can impact the process.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

John Reeve的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了