The Time Spent on Managing (Not Attending) Meetings is More Than 15%
This is the first post in the three-part article series about managing meetings effectively that are originally published on Avoma's blog.
Whether you like it or not, meetings are a significant time suck in your professional life. Irrespective of whether you have email, messaging, or other collaborative solutions at your workplace, you will still end up attending a lot of meetings in-person or online - and more often than not, they still feel like a waste of time.
Let’s put that perception aside and look at the data. Folks at?LucidMeetings?have done some detailed analysis.
Some eye-opening stats
Number of meetings
While there isn’t a standardized way to count this, here is an estimate based on some data and extrapolation. These statistics are staggering:
Effectiveness of meetings
Most people actually think meetings are useful and good, but of course, there is some room for improvement as well -
Why do we do so many meetings?
Not all meetings are wasteful or unnecessary. In fact, if they’re done well, they’re very effective in:
Unfortunately, this is frequently not the case with the way meetings are run today. A lot of them may feel like a waste of time because they require a lot of work for preparation, collaboration, and documentation.
Let’s look into that in detail and understand what’s a typical lifecycle of a meeting looks like.
A typical meeting lifecycle
In general, there are really 3 phases of any meeting’s lifecycle:
And in each phase, there are typical tasks we do.
Before the meeting
领英推荐
During the meeting
After the meeting
What’s the cost of managing a meeting?
Now let’s understand what’s the true cost of running or managing (not attending) a meeting.
Low-value tasks
If you look at the list of all the tasks, you can identify there are certain tasks like scheduling a meeting, dialing into a conferencing bridge, or planning for external meeting commute - all are low-value tasks that busy professionals should not be doing.
These low-value tasks take somewhere between 2 to 5 minutes each.
High-value tasks
At the same time, there are certain tasks like planning an agenda, preparing discussion materials, taking detailed meeting notes, etc., which are high-value tasks, which busy professionals must do, but they are doing it poorly because of multi-tasking or lack of time.
These high-value tasks typically take somewhere between 5 to 20 minutes per task to do.
Significant time suck!
If you do some quick math and sum it all up, you realize that you would be spending somewhere between 15-45 minutes managing activities around a single meeting (not actually attending)!
For the simplification, let’s average it out and assume -
On average, you’re spending 30 mins in managing a meeting.
And if you’re in a management role, then as per the research quoted above, you’re attending on average 12 meetings/week -
You’re spending 6 hours/week or 15% of your workweek time just managing activities around meetings (again, not attending meetings).
That’s a significant portion of your work week!
Obviously, I just highlighted a problem that exists in our day-to-day life, and you might be wondering, but what’s the solution to this problem?
In the next post of this series, I share how can we get back 15% of our time, that we didn’t know we were spending on just “managing” meetings, and not actually attending them!