Is It Time for Mitsubishi to Rethink Its U.S. Strategy?

Mitsubishi’s recent decision to develop its own platform for the Outlander represents a substantial strategic shift—especially considering it hasn’t independently developed an Outlander platform since the GS platform co-developed with DaimlerChrysler in 2006. With the Mitsubishi-Nissan-Renault alliance facing uncertainty, Mitsubishi’s future in the competitive U.S. market seems increasingly unclear.

The Nissan-Renault Divorce: What Now?

The Nissan-Renault alliance is fracturing, leaving Mitsubishi in a precarious position. Nissan is actively seeking new partnerships, and Mitsubishi has repurchased some Nissan-owned shares. However, this reshuffling leaves Mitsubishi facing significant strategic questions about its future, particularly in the competitive U.S. market.

Platform Development: Ambitious or Unrealistic?

Historically, the Outlander—Mitsubishi’s cornerstone in the U.S.—has depended heavily on shared or borrowed platforms. Transitioning to a Mitsubishi-developed platform entirely is a bold and potentially risky move. Developing a brand-new automotive platform requires extensive financial and technical resources, raising questions about Mitsubishi’s ability to execute this effectively, given its already strained resources and limited U.S. market penetration.

Short-Term Solutions vs. Long-Term Viability

Mitsubishi dealerships in the U.S. have consistently raised concerns about profitability, product competitiveness, and customer retention. Getting rid of their second-best-selling Mirage line hasn’t helped. It’s tough to recover from losing 25 percent of your sales. And while short-term solutions like introducing mild hybrid versions and adventure-themed trims might temporarily boost customer interest, they likely won’t address the brand's deeper structural issues.

Global Strength vs. U.S. Challenges

Globally, Mitsubishi enjoys stronger market positions, particularly in Japan and Southeast Asia. The U.S. market presents significant challenges for a brand that struggles with limited resources and a thin, aging lineup. Perhaps it’s time for Mitsubishi to consider focusing its resources where it already has a solid market position, potentially allowing it to return to the U.S. stronger and more competitive in the future.

Strategic Reflection Needed

The question facing Mitsubishi isn’t whether they can hang on in the U.S. but whether they should. Given current circumstances, redirecting their strategic focus towards markets where they’re already strong might be the most prudent choice.

What do you think? Should Mitsubishi continue pushing in the U.S. or pivot towards a more globally focused strategy?

Seeking strategic automotive insights or compelling industry-focused content??I’m available to help OEMs, dealerships, and industry leaders tell their stories through engaging, insightful, and strategic content. Let’s connect!