Through The Looking Glass - The  Future Of Capital Markets Technology

Through The Looking Glass - The Future Of Capital Markets Technology

Despite the billions of dollars spent by capital markets technologists in the past two decades, the return on investment and effort has been questionable at best.?It's surprising therefore that little has changed in how this money has been spent especially when set against the huge advances in design and technology that have occurred over the same period.?This article looks at why Capital Markets struggle with adopting new technologies and how this is changing.

?Fear is the Key

Wholesale change is difficult for cap markets as its protagonists believe that their systems are so complicated and the potential loss from failure ( either financial or reputational) are just too high to think radically.?Many bank CTOs cite these facts as reasons for not embracing new ideas.?It's ironic therefore that The Pandemic drove these firms to make huge changes in double quick time to support remote working and shattered the notion that they couldn't move quickly and achieve great results. Another factor in play, though, is that so much discretionary budget has been used up in meeting wave after wave of regulatory imperatives since the GFC which has saddled the industry with unacceptable levels of technical debt. This in turn has made adopting new technologies even harder to do.

?No App is an Island

?Another major challenge is that designers have been blinkered by the idea that what they are doing is building applications .?But the truth is that users care about accuracy of data and the ease with which they can manipulate and share data and then move onto the next related task. In short, the user cares about workflows while the devs focus on discrete applications.?Thankfully help is at hand as firms like Glue42 are leading the charge in workflow centric design and dissolving the boundaries between applications to create highly compelling workflows.

?Nowhere does this problem manifest itself greater than with Order Management Systems which provide a monolithic, heavyweight, application “tunnel” through which traders and their support staff attempt to handle the complete trade life cycle.?Inevitably these systems need to feed into other down stream or side stream subsystems and this is where the problems begin.?The result is a stovepipe of different in-house and 3rd party systems - all built with well meaning but different UIs.

?The low code movement has a big part to play here but not in terms of empowering the “citizen” developer but in making the developers themselves more productive. Velox is a good example of this.?They recognised at an early stage that trading is really all?about monetizing data and if you can free the data from their applications then better outcomes will follow.

?Firms like Velox mean that the asset class centric OMS of the past can be replaced by a more thoughtful technology stack composed of platforms, APIs and pre-built or custom workflows that address the different requirements of digital native information workers.

The Crypto Factor

?When Bitcoin first hit the scenes back in 2009, many jumped on the underlying blockchain technology as the real prize.?This spawned a plethora of blockchain projects all claiming they would revolutionise the world.?A little over ten years on and these projects have nearly all been taken out at night and quietly shot.?Instead, crypto assets have steadily become mainstream.?It just doesn't matter anymore whether you as an individual believe that an electronic token has intrinsic value or not.?The simple fact is that crypto exchanges earned over $24 billion in trading fees alone last year which was 60 % more than TradFi exchanges managed.?Crypto is here to stay and its history is being written by regulators as they grapple to get their heads around something that doesn't fit the traditional nomenclature of what they are used too.?What is more interesting is that the technologies underlying crypto will undergo something of a species?jump as it is based on today’s technology not yesterday’s. As digital assets become just another asset class alongside equities, bonds etc they will drag with them their more efficient technology processes.?Real time settlement and fractional ownership are just two such examples.?And, guess what, this is exactly what regulators have been batting for with their post GFC focus?on getting the best possible trading outcomes for retail investors.

Data is the New Standard

Our industry has made many attempts to normalise the terabytes of data it consumes, processes and then regurgitates.?Probably FIX is the only standard that has made any world-wide impact for front office and SWIFT, of course, plays its part in settlements. But talk to any Bank CIO and they will tell you that their biggest challenge is defining one master data set and then interpreting those of their counter-parties.?Again help is at hand from firms like Rapid Addition that offer sophisticated but easy to deploy message management platforms that can take this problem away.

?Looking Forwards

?Capital markets are at a crossroads.?The economic model today insists that participants lower their cost base and increase automation.?Add to this the wave of new tech that crypto will bring with it as it continues to enter the mainstream and the race is on for those firms to tackle the challenges above.?

Thankfully the answers are out there for those prepared to look.

Reena Raichura

Senior Fintech and Capital Markets Executive | Founder | Leader | FTSE 250 NED | CPO | Product | Technology | Strategy | Advisory | Thought Leadership | Enterprise | B2B | SaaS | Fintech Person of the Year 2023

2 年

Excellent article Steve Grob. One of the biggest challenges firms face is complexity creep where their technology stack and associated systems and processes become more complex over time and are held together by patches and workarounds. At some point, this becomes unsustainable and leads to a tipping point – to change or not to change and how??This is where the fear comes in. The great thing about Glue42 and the other firms you mentioned is that they provide a way forward for incremental change that is delivered at speed at low cost and with quick returns on investment. It’s a win-win. Collaboration drives innovation.

Audrey Costabile PhD

Risk and Financial Markets Regulation

2 年

Great read. Another thought: it’s no longer build versus buy. That’s changed to build, buy and integrate. Flexibility is key and that bifurcation is also becoming a thing of the pre-Covid past.

Jon Butler

Co-founder & CEO at Velox | Former Goldman Sachs Head of Equities Tech

2 年

It's lessening all the time but there is still the tendency to revert to type and build inhouse. partly this is a generational thing that will pass as new leaders come in but partly because of the justifiable fear of being locked into a vendor system that cannot change or integrate. The next generation of vendor development acceleration products are making the BUY & BUILD dream a reality and adoption is accelerating as the demand for new tech grows.

Mike Powell

CEO, Rapid Addition

2 年

Your point on fear of change is interesting Steve Grob - many legacy products and technologies are monolithic and lack interoperability. That means upgrading weaker links in the workflow or adding new functionality becomes a wholesale 'rip and replace' exercise. Either that or clients have to wait on the product roadmaps of slow moving vendors to catch up with their needs. The new wave of highly interoperable tech platforms such as Rapid Addition Limited and the other firms you mention means that agile augmentation and continuous innovation are a reality. This is both cost effective and accelerates time to market / creation of value for organisations.

Stephan von Massenbach

Managing Director, Chief Revenue Officer (CRO) at DIGITEC | FX Swaps & NDFs | Electronic Trading

2 年

Very well put Steve.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Steve Grob的更多文章

  • Fixing FinTech Marcomms 6 Build it and They Will Come – Won’t They?

    Fixing FinTech Marcomms 6 Build it and They Will Come – Won’t They?

    After an Easter break my series continues and with another guest writer - this time another great industry colleague…

    5 条评论
  • Fixing Fintech Marcomms 5 - Going Digital

    Fixing Fintech Marcomms 5 - Going Digital

    So, thanks to everyone for reading this series and for your likes and comments so far. Today we are going in a slightly…

    10 条评论
  • Fixing Fintech Marcomms 4 -Those who tell stories rule the world

    Fixing Fintech Marcomms 4 -Those who tell stories rule the world

    In Mel Gibson’s Apocalypto there is an amazing scene early on where a wizened village elder addresses the rest of the…

    10 条评论
  • Fixing FinTech Marcomms Part3 - Taking the P’s

    Fixing FinTech Marcomms Part3 - Taking the P’s

    I remember taking my seat for my first lecture at Manchester University (admittedly a few years ago now :)). My course…

    10 条评论
  • Fixing Fintech Marcomms Part 2 - Where's your brand narrative?

    Fixing Fintech Marcomms Part 2 - Where's your brand narrative?

    Thanks to everyone who read my last piece that explained why investing in tactical marketing activities without first…

    3 条评论
  • Why FinTech Marketing is Broken (and What to do About it)

    Why FinTech Marketing is Broken (and What to do About it)

    I talk to many Fintech CEO’s in my travels and most are charismatic, smart, determined, and business savvy, And yet…

    8 条评论
  • Are You Selling Vitamins or Aspirin?

    Are You Selling Vitamins or Aspirin?

    Chatting to industry colleagues the other day, we were bemoaning that capital markets have always been a highly…

    10 条评论
  • Appetite For Disruption

    Appetite For Disruption

    Looking forward to moderating this panel tomorrow. Slash and Axl couldn't make it but I will be joined by Toby Babb…

    2 条评论
  • If It Ain't Broke - Break It

    If It Ain't Broke - Break It

    At the end of a busy day last night zooming around the world (literally and metaphorically) a couple of interesting…

    4 条评论
  • When Will Desktop Interop Cross the Chasm?

    When Will Desktop Interop Cross the Chasm?

    Geoffrey Moore’s classic marketing text - Crossing the Chasm - explores the challenges of successfully marketing new…

    3 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了