Three Types of Clients: A Hypothesis on Maneuverability
Jesse Peters
Speaker | Executive Leadership | Business Transformation | Turnaround Strategist
When selling, it's easy to think all clients are the same. But the framework introduced by David C. Baker —broken down into three types of prospects—has stuck with me, and it's a game-changer. Knowing where your client stands can make all the difference.
Here's a breakdown of those three buckets and a hypothesis on maneuverability between them.
1) "Tell Me What to Do"
These are the clients who are looking for direction. They know they have a problem but don't know how to solve it. They don't need you to hold their hand—they need you to tell them exactly what to do. This is where you come in as the expert.
How to Spot Them:
What They Need: Clarity. These clients are stuck and want someone to show them the way. The faster you provide a roadmap, the faster they'll be off to the races.
2) "Do It For Me"
Then, there's the "do it for me" client. These people are not asking for advice and are not interested in a long, drawn-out conversation. They're paying you to handle things for them. They trust you to get it done, period.
How to Spot Them:
What They Need: Execution. These clients value speed and efficiency. They're not paying you for strategy—they're paying you to make things happen. Speed matters here, so cut to the chase and get things done.
领英推荐
3) "Borrowed Confidence"
This is where things get tricky, especially for those in consultative sales. The "borrowed confidence" client often appears to need a full strategy plan or deep insight into their situation, but in reality, they just need reassurance. These clients have already made tentative decisions (the "tell me what to do" stage), and they're capable of executing on their own (the "do it for me" phase), but they need someone to tell them, "Yes, you're making the right choice, and yes, you can do this."
The Problem:
How to Handle Them:
The Hypothesis: Maneuverability Between the Buckets
Here's where I throw a little hypothesis into the mix. If we imagine these three client types as buckets, lined up from left to right, here's how I think it works:
So why does this matter? The most valuable clients are the ones who can move to #3, where they trust their own decision-making and move forward with confidence. However, so many consultative sales processes fail to get clients to this point. What's the point of providing a service or solution if you don't empower your clients to make confident decisions on their own?
The more you understand these dynamics, the better equipped you'll be to handle each client type effectively and move them toward a more empowered, confident future.
The goal for the?borrowed confidence?client isn't just to offer reassurance. It's to empower them to make decisions without constantly coming back for validation. You've done your job once you help them realize they can do it themselves. And that's the true value we should be aiming for.
agency churn physician
3 个月love this Steve Patti
Process Simulation Twin for Future-Proof Decisions.
4 个月Effective negotiation is about finding win-win outcomes. It requires understanding, adaptability, and clarity of value. Jesse Peters
Marketing Leader | CMO Strategy, Performance Marketing & MarTech Automation Expert | GTM Specialist | Driving Revenue Growth in BFSI, FMCG, Healthcare, Retail, and F&B \ Driving Revenue-Driven Marketing
4 个月In many consultative sales processes, the issue of borrowed confidence" can significantly hinder progress. This concept, introduced by David C. Baker, highlights a common scenario where clients seek continuous reassurance rather than actionable strategies. Despite providing comprehensive advice, prospects often return with the same doubts, stuck in a loop of seeking validation.