Three Plus Two Is Six

On Monday my dear friend, collaborator and Google’s Chief Innovation Evangelist Frederik Pferdt presented a riddle to Germany’s Federal Minister for Economic Affairs and Energy Peter Altmaier at a luncheon we both attended. Frederik asked all attendees at the event to close their eyes and listen carefully as he vocalized some seemingly simple math:

“One plus one is two.”

“Two plus two is four.”

“Three plus two is six.”

“Six plus two is eight.”

Altmaier vocalized what many of us surely thought — when Frederik finalized his third equation he muttered: “Wrong.”

Of course it is wrong. And that is the point.

Pretty much all of us have a strong bias towards identifying what is wrong instead of acknowledging what is right and focusing on the learnings. Nobody gave Frederik kudos for getting a whopping 75% of his math right. Nobody asked what we can learn from his mistake. Instead we all zeroed in on the fact that he made a mistake.

If you want to get better, focus on the learning not on the failure.

This post is part of the “The Heretic”, Pascal Finette’s insights into leadership in exponential times. For entrepreneurs, corporate irritants and change makers. Raw, unfiltered and opinionated — delivered straight to your inbox. You will like it. → https://theheretic.org


Viktor Mirovic

Advancing human wellbeing by developing new ways to understand, measure, communicate and respond to emotions

5 年

It is still wrong. If you drive a great new Beamer and 99% of the spare parts are right, but that one part in the engine is wrong and the whole machine implodes there's little comfort in the other 99% :-) But I get your point, Sir!

回复
Kris Aguilar

Photographer ? San Diego, CA

5 年

"Wrong"!

回复
Pascal Finette

Chief Heretic and Founder @ radical? | The Future is a Renewable Resource | Author of Disrupt Disruption | GYSHIDO-San

5 年

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Pascal Finette的更多文章

  • AI and the Lost Sense of Wonder, Curiosity, and Intrigue

    AI and the Lost Sense of Wonder, Curiosity, and Intrigue

    Or: Why and how AI might (finally) turn our soulless machines into our software friends. I grew up idolizing early tech…

    2 条评论
  • Unlock Your Past to Define Your Future

    Unlock Your Past to Define Your Future

    Since my time at Singularity University, I have been discussing the concept of “exponential deception” – the…

    5 条评论
  • From Pyramids to Hourglasses

    From Pyramids to Hourglasses

    In 2016 to 2018 we embarked on a research journey into something we later came to call “Hourglass Economics”. We spent…

  • Executive Education – Maybe Revolution is the Point

    Executive Education – Maybe Revolution is the Point

    Why an overdue reckoning should bring radical improvement As schools around the world tentatively reopen, education…

    10 条评论
  • Essential Skills & Questions for Practical Futures-Thinking

    Essential Skills & Questions for Practical Futures-Thinking

    “The future is already here — it's just not very evenly distributed.” In that single sentence, a quote attributed to…

  • Forget T-Shapes

    Forget T-Shapes

    For a while now folks (especially those loosely connected to people management) have been talking about “T-Shaped…

    4 条评论
  • Sweat Your Fundamentals

    Sweat Your Fundamentals

    Something weird is happening in startup land as of late. For some reason, I see more and more pitch decks asking for…

    2 条评论
  • Past versus Future: Fight!

    Past versus Future: Fight!

    In one of my talks I describe what we have come to call The Four Horsemen — four of the most common challenges…

    1 条评论
  • Iterate, iterate, iterate

    Iterate, iterate, iterate

    By now it is startup and innovation project folklore that if you are not sufficiently embarrassed by the first version…

    2 条评论
  • Startups Beware: Time Horizon 2 Might Kill You

    Startups Beware: Time Horizon 2 Might Kill You

    In early 2000 Mehrdad Baghai published “The Alchemy of Growth: Practical Insights for Building the Enduring Enterprise”…

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了