Three momentous consequences of a 'conservative majority' on the Supreme Court
At FoxNews Opinion, Robert Delahunty and I preview our new book, coming out next week: The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Supreme Court.
"The balance of power on the Supreme Court has shifted in favor of a "conservative" majority since the appointment of three new justices during the Trump administration. Despite what is often said in the mainstream media, we argue in our new book, "The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Supreme Court," that this does not mean the current court routinely rubber-stamps laws or actions supported by conservative voters and politicians."
University of California, Berkeley | Legal Studies
1 年I agree Professor, especially in cases like Bostock where originalism now allows for the Civil Rights Act to be applied to gays and lesbians from being discriminated against on the basis of their sexual preferences. I took a class with a certain Dean last year where he said originalism doesn't protect minority rights. I recently asked him how this can be true in light of Bostock v. Clayton, and cases like Riley v. California, and all he did was refer me to his book...