Thought experiment: IFSF 2 OCPP

Opinions expressed are solely my own and do not represent the views or opinions of my employer or clients.

Introduction

The electric vehicle (EV) industry is rapidly evolving, presenting a fertile ground for innovation. EV chargers function as devices that sell measured units of time or energy, and in regions like Europe, these devices must undergo inspections to prevent consumer fraud. This necessity underscores the importance of reliable and standardized communication protocols.

Concurrently, modern Charge Station Management Systems (CSMS) are engineered to operate seamlessly in unattended forecourts and charging spaces. In contrast, achieving a similar level of automation in traditional fuel forecourts often requires a complex array of systems—including Forecourt Controllers (FCC), Electronic Payment Systems (EPS), Point of Sale (POS) systems, and payment devices integrated into pumps or kiosks.

This article explores a novel approach: integrating traditional fuel dispensers with contemporary EV charging protocols. By bridging these technologies, we aim to envision a unified, efficient, and resilient fueling infrastructure that benefits both operators and consumers.

The Concept: Designing an IFSF-to-OCPP Protocol Converter

What if we could harness advancements in EV charging protocols to enhance traditional fuel dispensing systems? Specifically, imagine designing an International Forecourt Standards Forum (IFSF) to Open Charge Point Protocol (OCPP) converter, allowing a CSMS to manage both authorization and refueling processes for fuel dispensers.

By introducing a local controller that handles protocol conversion and transaction management, we could create a system that not only integrates with modern charging infrastructure but also addresses sporadic connectivity issues commonly found in remote or high-traffic areas.

This thought experiment deliberately sets aside legal and regulatory considerations to focus solely on the technical possibilities. The core idea is to develop a device that interprets fuel dispenser actions and communicates with a CSMS using OCPP—a protocol widely adopted in the EV charging industry.

How It Would Work

The proposed system centers around a local controller acting as an intermediary between the fuel dispensers and the CSMS. Here's how it could function:

1. Local Controller Integration: Install a local controller at the forecourt that interfaces with fuel dispensers using the IFSF protocol and communicates with the CSMS via OCPP.
2. Fuel Dispenser Interaction: The local controller monitors the fuel dispensers, detecting when a nozzle is lifted or selected.
3. Payment Authorization: It accepts various payment methods, such as RF cards used in EV chargers, RFID tags for fleet management, or bank cards processed through an Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) terminal.
4. OCPP Messaging: Upon initiating a transaction, the local controller sends appropriate OCPP messages to the CSMS, requesting authorization and managing the session.
5. State Conversion: The controller translates fuel dispenser states (e.g., nozzle lifted, fueling in progress, nozzle replaced) into equivalent EV charger states to maintain protocol consistency and ensure seamless communication.
6. Local Transaction Handling: In case of connectivity issues with the CSMS, the local controller can autonomously handle transactions, ensuring uninterrupted service.

By effectively masquerading a fuel dispenser as an EV charger, this system allows traditional fuel dispensers to integrate with modern charging infrastructure while leveraging the reliability and features of a local controller.

Addressing Connectivity Issues with a Local Controller

Introducing a local controller offers significant advantages, particularly in mitigating sporadic connectivity problems:

• Autonomous Operation: The local controller can store authorization credentials and transaction data locally, allowing it to process payments and control dispensers even when the connection to the CSMS is lost.
• Data Synchronization: Once connectivity is restored, the local controller can synchronize transaction data with the CSMS, ensuring records remain accurate and up-to-date.
• Reduced Downtime: By handling transactions locally, the system minimizes downtime and enhances customer satisfaction by preventing service interruptions.
• Enhanced Security: Local controllers can implement robust security protocols to protect transaction data, reducing risks associated with transmitting sensitive information over unstable networks.
• Real-Time Monitoring: Operators can monitor forecourt activities in real-time or near-real-time, as the local controller buffers data and sends updates when possible.

In remote areas or locations with unreliable network infrastructure, this approach ensures that fueling operations remain consistent and dependable.

Technical Challenges

Implementing such a system presents several technical hurdles:

• Protocol Translation: Developing a reliable converter that accurately maps IFSF protocol messages to OCPP messages is crucial. This requires a deep understanding of both protocols to ensure data integrity and functional compatibility.
• State Management: Fuel dispensers and EV chargers have different operational states. Creating a robust state machine that accurately reflects the fuel dispenser's status within the EV charging framework is essential.
• Payment Integration: Supporting multiple payment methods necessitates integrating hardware and software capable of handling RF cards, RFID tags, and EFT transactions securely and efficiently.
• System Compatibility: The CSMS must handle inputs from both genuine EV chargers and adapted fuel dispensers without conflict, which may require additional software updates or configurations.
• Security Concerns: Ensuring secure communication between the local controller and the CSMS is vital to prevent unauthorized access or fraudulent activities.
• Local Storage and Processing: Implementing secure and reliable local storage solutions for transaction data, as well as processing capabilities to handle authorization and control logic during connectivity outages.

Potential Benefits

Adopting this integrated approach offers several compelling advantages:

• Unified Management: Operators could manage both EV charging stations and traditional fuel dispensers through a single CSMS platform, simplifying operations and maintenance.
• Cost Efficiency: Utilizing existing EV charging infrastructure for fuel dispensers could reduce the need for separate systems, lowering installation and operational costs.
• Improved Reliability: A local controller ensures that fueling operations can continue uninterrupted during network outages or connectivity issues.
• Enhanced Flexibility: The system could more easily adapt to future technological advancements, regulatory changes, or shifts in consumer behavior.
• Better Customer Experience: A unified and reliable system offers a more seamless and convenient experience for customers who use both fuel and electric vehicles.

Examples of Local Controller Functionality

• Transaction Buffering: The local controller can queue transactions when the network is down, processing them once connectivity is restored.
• Local Authorization: For fleet vehicles or regular customers, the system can use cached credentials to authorize fueling without immediate communication with the CSMS.
• Dynamic Pricing: The controller can store pricing information locally, ensuring customers are charged correctly even if real-time price updates are temporarily unavailable.
• Emergency Protocols: In case of critical failures, the local controller can safely shut down dispensers or limit operations to prevent accidents.

Security Considerations

Ensuring the security of the system is paramount:

• Encryption: All communication between the local controller and the CSMS should be encrypted to protect sensitive data.
• Authentication: Implement secure methods for verifying the identity of users and devices to prevent unauthorized access.
• Data Integrity: Measures should be in place to ensure that transaction data is not tampered with during storage or transmission.
• Compliance: The system must adhere to industry standards and regulations concerning data protection and transaction security.

Conclusion

While this idea might initially seem like a far-fetched hack, exploring the integration of IFSF and OCPP protocols opens up intriguing possibilities for the future of fueling infrastructure. By introducing a local controller that handles protocol conversion and transaction management, we can create a system that integrates with modern charging infrastructure and addresses the practical challenges of sporadic connectivity.

This approach offers several benefits, including unified management, cost efficiency, improved reliability, and an enhanced customer experience. By bridging traditional fuel dispensers with modern EV charging systems and incorporating local control mechanisms, we could develop more efficient, adaptable, and resilient forecourt management solutions.

Disclaimer: This article focuses solely on the technical aspects of the proposed system and does not address legal or regulatory implications, which would require thorough investigation before any real-world implementation.

By reimagining how fuel dispensers could interact with modern charging management systems—and addressing connectivity challenges through local controllers—we open the door to innovative solutions that could benefit both operators and consumers. As the EV industry continues to grow, such cross-disciplinary approaches might pave the way for more integrated and efficient energy distribution networks.