Thorough Due Diligence in Mining: A Zimbabwean Perspective

In the ever-evolving sphere of mining, the concept of due diligence emerges as a lodestar, steering investment choices, fostering sustainable practices, and ensuring unwavering compliance with regulatory frameworks. Zimbabwe, adorned with abundant mineral riches, has embarked on a journey to fortify its due diligence fabric, aligning it with global benchmarks. This strategic alignment not only amplifies transparency but also elevates environmental stewardship, operational finesse, and meticulous registration protocols. As an advisor well-acquainted with the intricacies of mining operations and investment regulatory compliance across diverse African terrains, I am poised to navigate the intricate tapestry of due diligence within Zimbabwe's mining landscape.

?? Comprehensive Geological Assessment

At the heart of every mining venture lies a robust geological assessment, and Zimbabwe's voyage commences with an exhaustive evaluation of its mineral reservoirs. Scrutinizing geological reports, drilling data, and sampling outcomes stands as a cornerstone. Financial institutions, eager to fuel mineral production, demand an intimate grasp of a deposit's potential yield, mineral quality, and geotechnical attributes. This meticulous inquiry paves the path for judicious investment verdicts.

?? Environmental Impact Evaluation

Zimbabwe's unswerving dedication to responsible mining finds its manifestation in the rigorous environmental regulations encapsulated in the Environmental Management Act (Chapter 20:27). Antecedent to granting approvals, potential mining projects traverse an exacting Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) journey. This methodical evaluation meticulously dissects potential environmental, social, and economic repercussions arising from mining operations. The augmented regulatory framework underscores the holistic nature of due diligence, transcending monetary confines to encompass the potential ramifications of a venture on ecosystems and local communities.

?? Operational and Technical Scrutiny

Mining's intricate fabric necessitates an intricate grasp of operational and technical intricacies. Financial institutions, in their quest to finance mining ventures, scrutinize operational blueprints, mining methodologies, and proposed processing strategies. Confidence in a robust technical foundation, coupled with alignment with industry best practices, assumes paramount significance.

?? Legal and Regulatory Compliance

Navigating the labyrinthine corridors of legal and regulatory obligations is quintessential to Zimbabwe's due diligence endeavor. Mining projects stand obliged to adhere to an array of regulations encompassing environmental preservation, labor regulations, safety protocols, and the art of community engagement. Scrutinizing permits, licenses, and historical compliance records is indispensable, as it cements a project's legal robustness. Proper registration emerges as a cornerstone, with any deviations or non-compliance issues holding the potential to reverberate profoundly through a project's viability. These pivotal regulatory mandates are enshrined in the Environmental Management Act (Chapter 20:27), encapsulating a spectrum of precise definitions and guiding principles.

??? Social and Community Considerations

Mining ventures are intrinsically enmeshed within the communities they inhabit. In Zimbabwe, the ambit of due diligence extends to evaluating a project's social footprint. Financial institutions meticulously assess a project's strategies for community engagement, employment creation, and local development. Ventures prioritizing social responsibility and nurturing collaboration with stakeholders stand better poised to amass support and secure funding.

?? Financial Viability Assessment

While technical and environmental dimensions loom substantial, a mining venture's financial viability is a linchpin. Financial institutions meticulously dissect projections, scrutinising anticipated revenues, forecasted expenditures, and envisaged return on investment. These diligent assessments underpin whether a project's fiscal trajectory harmonizes with the financial institution's risk tolerance and investment objectives.

?? Reporting Transparency

Transparent reporting stands as an elemental facet of effective due diligence. Project proponents are entrusted with the onus of delivering comprehensive, accurate information, empowering financial institutions to render prudent judgments. Such transparency not only nurtures trust but also guarantees that potential risks and rewards are comprehensively comprehended.

?? Vedanta Case: Lessons in Liability and Due Diligence

The landscape of recent case law reveals a discernible trend—parties are increasingly asserting claims against UK-domiciled parent companies for the actions or inactions of their overseas subsidiaries. A pivotal juncture in this trajectory is the landmark judgment in Vedanta Resources Plc and Konkola Copper Mines Plc v Lungowe and Ors. This ruling cast a spotlight on the potential liability of a UK parent company for the operational activities of its foreign subsidiary.

Background: An Unfolding Legal Discourse

In recent years, the liability of UK parent companies has become a focal point in various cases. In proceedings such as Okpabi & Ors v Royal Dutch Shell plc, Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Ltd, and AAA & Others v Unilever Plc & Unilever Tea Kenya Ltd, claims were filed against UK parent companies for incidents transpiring in Nigeria and Kenya.

Demonstrating the jurisdiction of English Courts hinged on establishing a substantial matter for trial. This necessitated showcasing a viable argument that the UK parent company owed a duty of care to the claimants. Both in the Shell and Unilever cases, the contention of a duty of care was not substantiated.

In Shell's instance, the Court of Appeal noted inadequate proximity between the UK parent company and the Nigerian claimants due to the limited control exerted by the UK parent over the Nigerian subsidiary's operations. Consequently, the second criterion of the Caparo Industries v Dickman test, essential for imposing a duty of care, wasn't met.

In Unilever, the Court of Appeal posited that a duty of care would typically emerge under two scenarios: when the parent essentially assumed the subsidiary's management role or provided pertinent risk management advice. In that case, these scenarios were not met, and proximity between the UK parent and the claimants fell short, failing to meet the second criterion of the Caparo test.

The Vedanta Case: A Momentous Precedent

Vedanta's narrative unfolded as 1,826 Zambian villagers presented a claim against Vedanta Resources Plc, a UK mining entity, and its Zambian subsidiary, KCM. The allegation pertained to the release of harmful substances from a KCM-operated mine into waterways utilized for potable water and irrigation.

Instances of Vedanta's engagement in KCM's management included the publication of a sustainability report asserting board oversight, a management services agreement with KCM, and public statements underscoring commitments to address environmental perils and technical deficiencies in KCM's mining infrastructure.

The pivotal question, as the Supreme Court assessed jurisdiction, was whether the claimants could demonstrate that Vedanta had significantly intervened in KCM's mine management to owe a duty of care to the claimants.

Vedanta and KCM contended that Unilever and Shell established a principle that a parent company couldn't be held liable solely for providing group-wide policies and guidelines. The Supreme Court, however, rejected this notion, asserting that a parent company could indeed assume a duty of care if it executed and managed group-wide policies.

The Supreme Court, apprehensive of confining parent company liability to the two scenarios outlined in Unilever, opted for a nuanced approach. It emphasized a case-by-case analysis of the degree of management and control exercised by the parent company over its subsidiaries' activities.

In the Vedanta case, the Supreme Court concluded that the claimants did present a valid argument that Vedanta owed them a duty

?? Conclusion and Upcoming Discussion on September 17th ???

In navigating the multifaceted landscape of mining due diligence within Zimbabwe, we uncover a web of considerations that extend beyond mere financial metrics. The amalgamation of geological assessment, environmental consciousness, technical prowess, legal compliance, social harmony, financial viability, and transparent reporting underscores Zimbabwe's commitment to responsible mining practices. As the nation aligns its due diligence framework with global standards, it not only safeguards its mineral wealth but also embraces sustainable practices that foster both economic growth and environmental preservation.

In this vein, it is imperative to highlight the landmark case of Vedanta Resources Plc and Konkola Copper Mines Plc v Lungowe and Ors, which resonates with the evolving discourse surrounding the liability of UK parent companies for the activities of their foreign subsidiaries. This case injects new dimensions into the tapestry of due diligence, prompting us to contemplate the intricate relationships between parent companies and their overseas endeavors. The implications of this case ripple across multinational corporations, signaling a heightened scope for parent company duty of care.

As we delve deeper into these matters, I am pleased to announce an upcoming discussion scheduled for September 17th. During this event, we will dissect and deliberate these pivotal issues, bringing together local mining experts, stakeholders, and the custodians of mining enterprises. Our shared exploration of due diligence, environmental stewardship, corporate responsibility, and the Vedanta case promises to be an enlightening and productive exchange of insights. I extend an open invitation to all interested parties to join us on this occasion to contribute to the discourse that shapes the future of responsible mining practices and their global implications.

?? Mark your calendars for September 17th, as we delve into the heart of these pressing issues and forge a path toward more sustainable and ethically sound mining practices. Your participation is pivotal in charting the course toward responsible resource utilization and environmental preservation. See you on September 17th for an illuminating discussion that holds the potential to shape the mining landscape for years to come. ????

Regenerate

Send a message