Third Parties and ESG Risks
Vipul Jain
Partner at KPMG India, Managed Services | Third Party Risk Management | AML | Views are personal.
In an increasingly interconnected world, organizations are not just responsible for their own actions, but also the actions of the third parties associated with them.
Third parties can include suppliers, vendors, distributors and business partners amongst others, these third parties can significantly impact an organization's environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. This post will explore some areas where third parties can influence an organization's ESG parameters: environmental sustainability, social responsibility, and governance ethics.
Environmental Sustainability
Third parties can have a profound effect on an organization's environmental footprint. For instance, a supplier may engage in environmentally damaging practices, like improper waste disposal or excessive resource consumption, which indirectly contributes to the organization's environmental impact. In order to improve their environmental sustainability, organizations should vet the range of third-parties associate with them for environmentally friendly practices and consider integrating ESG criteria into their procurement processes.
Social Responsibility
Third parties can also influence an organization's social responsibility. This can come up in a number of ways, such as through the treatment of workers, community engagement, and adherence to human rights principles. If a third party fails to uphold these standards, it can reflect poorly on the organization and damage its reputation.
Governance Ethics
Lastly, third parties can impact an organization's governance ethics. This primarily concerns issues of corruption, fraud, and business ethics. If a third party engages in unethical or illegal activities, it can jeopardize the organization's compliance status and lead to significant legal, reputational and financial repercussions. Therefore, organizations must implement rigorous third-party due diligence processes to verify their associates' ethical standing and maintain their own governance integrity.
Steps for Organizations
After understanding the impact of third parties on an organization's ESG performance, it is essential to take the next steps in ensuring responsible management of these relationships.
领英推荐
Develop a Comprehensive ESG Policy
Firstly, organizations should develop a comprehensive ESG policy. This policy should clearly outline the organization's commitment to environmental sustainability, social responsibility, and governance ethics, and establish expectations for third-party associates.
Strengthen Due Diligence Processes
Secondly, organizations should strengthen their due diligence processes. This involves conducting thorough background checks on potential third-party associates, assessing their ESG performance, and monitoring their ongoing compliance.
Foster Open Communication
Lastly, organizations should foster open communication with their third-party associates. By engaging in regular dialogue, organizations can ensure their third-party associates are aware of their ESG expectations and can address any potential issues promptly.
Final Thoughts
The influence of third parties on an organization's ESG performance is significant. By responsibly managing these relationships, organizations can improve their ESG performance, safeguard their reputation, and make positive contributions to a more sustainable and ethical business environment.
My other posts on Third Party Risk Management can be found under the profile page.
Partner & Head, Managed Services (Advisory) | Forensic, F&A, Learning, HR and Insight Led Sales
5 个月Very relevant and succinct Vipul. ESG risk is one of the top risks when it comes to ”Association Risks”. That is because it can have far reaching implications on compliance to regulatory environment that an organisation is striving for. The newsprint is rife with instances of heavy penalties that have been imposed on organisations due to their association with third parties who did not uphold the same standards of compliances.