Third Debate : September

Recognition of Prior Learning: Transforming Pre-Experience Master’s Programs

The landscape of higher education is undergoing significant changes, particularly with the rise of Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL), which has started reshaping traditional educational pathways such as pre-experience master’s programs. These programs have historically served as an essential step for individuals with limited professional experience, providing them with the foundational knowledge and skills required to advance in their desired careers. However, as the recognition of prior knowledge becomes more prevalent, the need for such programs is being called into question. The shift towards acknowledging students' previous learning and professional achievements is leading to a rethinking of educational models and the structure of postgraduate education.

RPL is a process through which students receive formal recognition for the skills and knowledge they have accumulated through work experience, short courses, or informal learning environments. This recognition allows institutions to exempt students from certain modules or even entire courses, effectively fast-tracking their academic journey. This shift towards recognising prior learning aligns with a broader trend of promoting lifelong learning, where skills development is seen as a continuous process rather than a rigid pathway tied solely to formal education. RPL emphasises the idea that learning happens beyond traditional classrooms and that professional experiences can be just as valuable as academic ones.

For instance, a working professional who has accumulated years of practical experience in project management might not need to take a foundational course in project management when pursuing a master’s degree in business administration. Instead, they could receive credit for their prior experience and proceed to more advanced modules, thus streamlining their educational journey. RPL provides an opportunity for students to build on their existing knowledge and skills, potentially reducing both the cost and time required to complete their degree.

Pre-experience master’s programs have traditionally been designed for students with limited or no professional experience, offering them foundational training to prepare for new career paths. These programs were considered a vital bridge for individuals transitioning into new fields or roles. However, the rise of RPL is gradually reducing the demand for such programs, as students with relevant experience can bypass these foundational courses and move directly into more advanced or specialised areas of study.

The growing recognition of professional experience through RPL has led to a shift in how educational institutions structure their offerings. Students who already possess the necessary foundational knowledge and skills are no longer required to repeat content they have mastered through professional or informal learning. As a result, universities are rethinking the value and necessity of pre-experience master’s programs, which are now seen as redundant for a significant portion of students with relevant work experience.

While RPL has numerous advantages, its implementation has created a new set of challenges, particularly in programs where students with vastly different levels of experience are combined into the same cohort. This blending of students with varying professional backgrounds has led to mixed cohorts, where seasoned professionals are studying alongside students with little or no experience in the field. Such mixed cohorts can create challenges in both learning outcomes and social dynamics.

One of the primary learning challenges is the disparity in knowledge and skills between experienced and less-experienced students. Experienced students may become frustrated with the slower pace of foundational courses, as they feel they are relearning content they already know. Conversely, less-experienced students may feel overwhelmed by the knowledge gap between themselves and their peers, leading to frustration and a sense of inadequacy. This tension can hinder the overall learning environment, as instructors must strike a delicate balance between catering to students who are just starting out and those who already possess a significant amount of prior knowledge.

Moreover, the social dynamics within mixed cohorts can also be challenging. The significant age gap between seasoned professionals and younger, less-experienced students may create difficulties in forming meaningful social connections. Professionals with years of experience may struggle to relate to younger students, leading to divided networks within the cohort. These social divisions can undermine the sense of community within the program, which is an important aspect of the learning experience

As RPL becomes more widespread, educational institutions are increasingly moving towards more flexible, modular learning models. Rather than offering rigid programs with predetermined pathways, universities are now creating tailored learning experiences that allow students to build on their prior experience and progress at their own pace. This shift towards modular education offers several advantages, including increased flexibility, personalised learning pathways, and the ability to tailor education to individual student needs

For students, this shift represents a more efficient route to achieving academic and professional qualifications. Instead of being required to complete a set of foundational courses that may not be relevant to their experience level, they can focus on more advanced or specialized content that aligns with their professional goals. For educational institutions, this trend requires a reconsideration of how they design and deliver programs. Universities must now offer more flexible pathways that recognize the value of prior learning while still ensuring that all students receive the education and skills needed to succeed in their careers

The rise of RPL is accelerating the decline of traditional pre-experience master’s programs. While these programs once served as an essential bridge for individuals transitioning into new fields, their relevance is being challenged by the growing recognition of prior learning and professional experience. As a result, educational institutions are shifting towards more flexible, modular models that allow students to build on their existing knowledge and skills without repeating content they have already mastered.

In the short term, the blending of experienced and less-experienced students in mixed cohorts may create challenges, both in terms of learning outcomes and social dynamics. However, in the long term, the shift towards more personalised learning pathways represents a positive step towards a more inclusive and efficient educational model that recognizes the value of lifelong learning. As RPL continues to reshape the landscape of education, institutions must adapt by offering flexible and tailored learning options that ensure effective learning environments for all students.

The Strategic Importance of Offering a Full-Time MBA Program in Business Schools

In an increasingly dynamic and competitive global business landscape, business schools face growing pressure to offer programs that meet both academic and professional demands. One such offering is the full-time Master of Business Administration (MBA) program, which serves as a crucial element in shaping future business leaders. By providing a full-time MBA program, a business school not only enhances its brand and value but also fosters stronger relationships with industry leaders. While both full-time MBA programs and Executive MBA (EMBA) programs are vital, they cater to different profiles and career trajectories. I explore here why a business school should offer a full-time MBA program and how it differs from an EMBA program, highlighting their respective roles in business education.

A primary reason for a business school to offer a full-time MBA program is its ability to attract high-potential students who are committed to investing in their education and careers. Full-time MBA students are typically younger, with less professional experience compared to their EMBA counterparts, and they often seek significant career shifts or advancement. The full-time format allows students to fully immerse themselves in the academic environment, offering a transformative educational experience . This immersive nature attracts candidates eager to dedicate themselves entirely to their studies without the distractions of ongoing professional obligations.

The demographics of full-time MBA students differ from those in EMBA programs, which target working professionals who generally have substantial managerial experience and aim to advance within their current careers. While both programs draw talented individuals, full-time MBA candidates typically seek new opportunities, while EMBA students focus on advancing within their existing organisations. The ability to attract ambitious, career-driven individuals positions a business school as a competitive institution capable of developing emerging business leaders.

Full-time MBA programs offer a rigorous and immersive experience, positioning the business school as a leader in developing the next generation of business innovators and leaders. Full-time students engage deeply with the curriculum, including networking opportunities, internships, global study trips, and leadership development activities. These elements allow students to gain hands-on experience and practical skills that can be directly applied in their post-graduation careers. Many students use the full-time MBA program as a pivotal moment in their careers, making significant shifts into new industries or roles, often at a global level.

In contrast, EMBA programs cater to working professionals who balance their studies with ongoing employment. These students, who typically have more managerial experience, bring a wealth of knowledge into the classroom and apply what they learn in real-time to their professional roles. While EMBA programs also foster leadership development, their focus is more on refining and advancing existing competencies than facilitating career shifts. The immediate applicability of their learning enhances the EMBA experience, but the transformational experience often associated with a full-time MBA is less pronounced due to the part-time nature of their studies.

A business school offering a full-time MBA program can position itself as a transformative institution that nurtures not just professional development but personal growth as well. The immersive and holistic approach to education in full-time MBA programs helps mould students into adaptable, well-rounded leaders prepared to navigate the complexities of today’s global business environment.

One of the significant advantages of a full-time MBA program is the opportunity it offers students to build strong connections with top-tier companies and industry leaders. Through internships, real-world consulting projects, and industry partnerships, full-time MBA students gain practical experience and valuable networking opportunities. These experiences help students to not only apply classroom knowledge in real-world contexts but also to form lasting professional relationships that benefit both the student and the business school.

For example, full-time MBA students often participate in internships during their studies, working closely with companies that align with their career goals. These internships provide a gateway for future employment opportunities while reinforcing the connection between the school and the business community. Additionally, full-time students tend to have more time to participate in extracurricular activities, global immersion programs, and other networking opportunities, further strengthening the business school's ties to the industry.

By contrast, EMBA students usually bring established industry connections into the program. Their professional experience allows them to leverage their networks throughout their studies. The EMBA classroom is often composed of high-level professionals who are already deeply embedded in their respective industries, creating a peer-learning environment that fosters high-level networking. However, the time commitments of EMBA students, who are often balancing demanding careers, limit their participation in extracurricular and networking activities. Consequently, while EMBA students can offer immediate professional insights and connections, full-time MBA students, through internships and projects, have more extensive opportunities to forge new industry relationships.

Offering a full-time MBA program can significantly enhance a business school’s brand equity by producing graduates who hold influential positions across diverse industries. Full-time MBA graduates often move into leadership roles in various sectors, reflecting the school's capacity to develop versatile and high-achieving professionals. These alumni serve as ambassadors for the business school, demonstrating the value of the full-time MBA to potential students, industry leaders, and donors.

In contrast, EMBA graduates tend to remain within their current organisations, typically advancing to senior executive positions. While this enhances the business school’s reputation for developing top executives, it does not carry the same breadth of industry influence as full-time MBA graduates, who often transition to new roles or companies. Thus, while both programs contribute to brand equity, full-time MBA programs tend to have a broader impact by producing leaders who occupy various influential roles across industries.

Both full-time MBA and part-time EMBA programs offer significant value to business schools, but they serve distinct purposes and student demographics. A full-time MBA program allows a business school to attract high-potential, diverse candidates who are seeking transformative educational experiences and significant career shifts. By immersing students in a rigorous academic environment with extensive networking and industry connection opportunities, a full-time MBA program positions a business school as a leader in developing the next generation of business innovators and leaders.

In contrast, an EMBA program caters to working professionals aiming to refine their existing skills and advance within their current organisations. While EMBA programs offer valuable networking opportunities and immediate application of classroom learning, they do not provide the same level of immersive, transformative experiences as full-time MBA programs. Therefore, offering a full-time MBA program is essential for a business school that aims to cultivate future business leaders, enhance its brand, and strengthen its relationships with the business community.

?

The Exploitation of International Students: A Critical Examination of Irish Universities' Recruitment Practices

In recent years, Irish universities have increasingly turned their attention towards the recruitment of international students, particularly those from non-EU countries. This shift has resulted in a significant increase in revenue due to the high fees these students are required to pay—often in excess of €17,000 per year. However, this surge in income has not been met with a corresponding increase in resources or support for the students, leading to questions about where this additional revenue is going. As we approach a general election, it is imperative that we scrutinise both the university management and the political class, including our current Taoiseach, who once served as the Minister for Higher Education. The current state of affairs is nothing short of a disservice to the students and a mismanagement of public trust.

Historically, many Master's courses in Ireland catered predominantly to domestic students, with class sizes ranging from 30 to 40 students. These students, mostly Irish, paid fees of approximately €8,000 per annum. However, the landscape has drastically changed. Today, these courses are swelling with enrolments, often reaching 80 to 100 students, with more than 80% of these being non-EU students. The financial implications of this shift are stark: the income per course has increased substantially, with the majority of this income now being derived from international students who pay more than double the fees of their Irish counterparts.

Despite this influx of revenue, there has been little to no investment in additional resources to support the growing student population. Class sizes have ballooned without corresponding increases in academic staff, student services, or infrastructure. The result is a diluted educational experience for all students, both international and domestic. The question that arises is, where is the income going? Universities are clearly benefiting from the increased fee income, but the lack of transparency and accountability in how these funds are being utilised raises serious concerns.

Senior management in Irish universities must be held accountable for this exploitation. The aggressive recruitment of international students without adequate investment in their educational experience is not only unethical but also unsustainable. Universities should prioritise the quality of education and support services for all students, regardless of their country of origin. However, the current situation suggests that profit is being placed above student welfare.

The lack of additional resources—whether in the form of more lecturers, improved facilities, or enhanced student support—indicates a gross mismanagement of funds. It is incumbent upon university leaders to justify their financial decisions and to demonstrate how the significant increase in fee income is being reinvested into the institution to benefit the student body. Failure to do so undermines the credibility of the higher education system and risks damaging Ireland’s reputation as a destination for international students.

The political class, particularly those who have held or currently hold the education portfolio, must also bear responsibility for this situation. Our Taoiseach, who previously served as Minister for Higher Education, should have been aware of these developments and taken steps to address them. The government’s role in overseeing higher education includes ensuring that universities do not prioritise profit over the quality of education. However, the current scenario suggests a glaring oversight or, worse, complicity in the exploitation of international students.

As we approach a general election, it is crucial that these issues are brought to the forefront of political discourse. Voters deserve to know how their leaders have allowed this situation to develop and what plans they have to rectify it. The exploitation of international students not only tarnishes the reputation of Irish higher education but also represents a broader failure of governance. It is time for a thorough investigation into the financial practices of universities and a re-evaluation of government policies regarding higher education funding and oversight.

The recruitment of international students to Master's courses in Ireland has undoubtedly increased the financial resources of universities, but this has not translated into better educational outcomes or support for students. The responsibility for this failure lies with both university management and the political leaders who have neglected to address these issues. In a year of general elections, it is imperative that we demand accountability and transparency from those in power. The exploitation of students for financial gain is unacceptable, and it is time for meaningful change in how Irish universities and the government approach higher education.

?

?