Think patient

Think patient

Just imagine I am being asked to take part in a clinical trial. It will run for 2 years. I am asked to use a provided smartphone to fill out a daily diary for a number of months.

Now... like many people these days, I already have a smartphone. I'm an iPhone guy. It fits in my left pocket. I keep my keys and money in my right pocket - I don't want to scratch the screen. I charge it more than once a day.

I don't think I want to carry around another device... My pockets are already full. I really don't think I could routinely charge 2 devices...

In a clinical trial setting, being asked to use a 2nd device is negative engagement and a barrier for my participation.

Changing Engagement

I use Facebook. I used LinkedIn. I use google search. I do all these on my laptop, tablet and PDA. I expect to be able to use any of them depending on the situation. If I am sitting down at my desk, or filling out larger forms, I will use my laptop. I like that I can use the solutions from these companies on any device. I am engaged with these companies and use their services all the time.

In clinical trials, patient engagement is really important.

It is no longer a barrier to use technology in clinical trials. It is a barrier if you do not offer technology that fits in with the patient’s lifestyle. Paper documents or additional electronic devices will be a significant barrier to most people.

Negative clinical trial experiences will affect recruitment, compliance and retention – all the things that are most important to sponsor companies conducting research.

As a patient in a clinical trial, I want to use any of my online devices.

Let me give you a real life example of positive engagement.

John has Multiple Sclerosis. Despite the seriousness of his condition, he is upbeat and wants to be actively involved in decisions regarding his treatment regime. 

John is informed of a clinical trial – he receives a study invitation via  email. This is a referral John receives from his doctor for a clinical study opportunity his doctor thinks might be appropriate. He clicks on the link while he is travelling... The link opens in a browser on his mobile device. He quickly completes a simple pre-screener on his mobile to find that he may qualify for the study. Great news.  

Back at home, he surfs the web on his laptop. Whilst doing so, he receives a notification email and sees that it is a message from the study investigator. He confirms that John may be eligible to join the study evaluating a new treatment that could help John manage his condition better. The investigator asks John to complete an additional form regarding his medical history and current treatments. This electronic form is longer than before, but John is keen to be involved. He completes this extended form on his laptop as it is more convenient.

A couple of weeks later, John meets the investigator during a site visit to conduct some final assessments to confirm that he meets all of the the inclusion / exclusion criteria and he is enrolled in the study. He has the option to receive all of the study materials through a patient study portal - he agrees.

Back at home, he logs into the patient study portal. It gives him access to all the information about the study, he sees the electronic Informed Consent including a video with further information about the conduct of the study. John can electronically sign his agreement to join the study and share his information. The system tells him that the investigator will soon counter-sign the form. John can see from the interactive study guide what is going to happen next, and the procedures that will be followed.

When he is on the move, he accesses his study portal via his mobile. He is reminded about data entry and study visits so it is easy to keep track of the things he needs to do. If he has any questions, he can easily get in contact with the study site via the same secure portal.

Thats engagement. 
The above example is modelled on a standard Clinpal implementation with
             Recruit, Engage and Educate modules utilised


Stephen Allan Weitzman

Editor in Chief at FDA Information Repository -- IRAI

7 年

What happened to the new catch phrase "patient centered." Guess it was just a slogan. Good article and an apprpriate illustration.

回复
Irfan Khan, MD

CEO, Circuit Clinical

7 年

Agree wholeheartedly. More design and implementation in our field needs a "jobs to be done" - for the patient - approach.

回复
Panikos Christofi

Senior Director, Customer Success, Saama

7 年

Excellently laid out and the following quote from above captures my sentiment as well: "It is no longer a barrier to use technology in clinical trials. It is a barrier if you do not offer technology that fits in with the patient’s lifestyle"

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Doug Bain的更多文章

  • Clinical trial technology evolution - 2015 ??

    Clinical trial technology evolution - 2015 ??

    Introduction Winston Churchill once said 'The farther back you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see.'…

    5 条评论
  • AI Avatars for ClinTech

    AI Avatars for ClinTech

    A few years ago, I was working with our User Experience Designer on a clintech product. We were attempting to come up…

    3 条评论
  • The AI CRO

    The AI CRO

    Introduction Contract Research Organizations (CROs) have operated in a largely unchanged manner for over 20 years, with…

    15 条评论
  • Autonomy in clinical research and CDISC USDM

    Autonomy in clinical research and CDISC USDM

    When designing a clinical research technology solution, one of the important steps is to define the data model, and -…

    14 条评论
  • IRB Software - User stories

    IRB Software - User stories

    Brad Hightower caught my interest with a post on the need for a new IRB. As a software guy, I immediately jumped to…

    14 条评论
  • ClinTech - Doing Better (2) - Data Integration with AI

    ClinTech - Doing Better (2) - Data Integration with AI

    Second in my series of posts on how we can improve technologies used in clinical trials. I cover quite a lot of ground…

  • Why EDC systems generate too many queries

    Why EDC systems generate too many queries

    Triggered by a post from Brad Hightower I would like to explain the background to why some EDC systems generate what…

    9 条评论
  • Quality by Design in Clinical Trials

    Quality by Design in Clinical Trials

    The recent draft ICH-E6 R3 Annex 2 [1] continues the guidance from ICH-E6 Release 3 release April 2023 in its reference…

  • Can document storage be validated against 21 CFR Part 11?

    Can document storage be validated against 21 CFR Part 11?

    The FDA Regulation 21 CFR Part 11 was released 27 years ago. It was designed to help assure the integrity of clinical…

    12 条评论
  • Sponsor Oversight Technology in clinical trials

    Sponsor Oversight Technology in clinical trials

    A key regulatory focus in recent years has been for clinical trial sponsors to provide auditors evidence of the…

    4 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了