Things we can be pretty sure about more advanced civilizations than humans even without a first contact
First, let's address the elephant in the room.
So who is operating these supersonic vehicles doing 90 right angle turns while pulling 600g in space air or water? Vehicles more and more frequently seeking and testing defenses of sensitive military US airspace? Here is a transcript of?Luis Elizondo the former director of US pentagon Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) here and here
Recently even Ex CIA Director John Brennan when asked on the same navy video treaded carefully but bravely too.
"I think it’s a bit presumptuous and arrogant for us to believe that there’s no other form of life anywhere in the entire universe. What that might?be?is subject to a lot of different views.
But I think some of the phenomena we’re going to be seeing continues to be unexplained and might, in fact, be some type of phenomenon that is the result of something that we don’t yet understand and that could involve some type of activity that some might say constitutes a different form of life."
But if there is on a daily basis?technology superior to US violating US airspace confirmed by nobody less than?US president. Why the former commander of the strongest military on Earth felt a need to confirm UFO on public TV. A word long associated with great stigma and risked being laughed at? Which he immediately was. When we know he is a savvy politician? Most probably because he thought?the situation is getting serious?enough for it to be worth it. Maybe he rather wanted to be remembered as the one being laughed at than as the one who was silent when people needed to be warned.
The already nonzero probability of not being alone in the universe due to these now US government/president confirmed sightings of superior technology did suddenly become somewhat higher.
Let’s discuss this now clearly not zero possibility and possible consequences of it.
What can we deduce?about perhaps more technologically advanced civilizations just from our own observations of the universe? Nature and physics laws that seem to govern all atoms, molecules, the evolution of life, and DNA's typically selfish genes?
Let's start with the basics. If they evolved from the simplest self-improving life forms as we did. What did we observed as true for even the simplest life forms?
Constant violent fight for?limited resources?in order to survive and grow.
1. Every stage of evolution They probably had to survive constant violent competition for limited resources too
What survival strategies do usually self-emerge even in simplest observed real or simulated life forms??Assimilation?or?Elimination or as we humans call it. A Violence
2. If evolved and faced natural selection then Their genome perhaps led to the survival of selfish genes too
Those who had grown faster legs or bigger teeth to get to the limited resources survived storing strategy to genes and grown at expense of those who didn't. Creating different tiers and hierarchies or as we call it. A food-chain
3. They probably had a history full of in evolution typical Assimilate/Eliminate decisions as a result of expressions of historically accumulated selfish genes (Wars)
War is just a different name for limited resources and selfish gene competition. You can clearly see the history of all the human selfish gene competition in this video of the border movements. Essentially the same population growth and border movement that you can observe in the petri dish with multiple types of bacteria
As we speak evolution is equipping all known lifeforms with all kinds of new weapons.
领英推荐
4. At some phase they probably invented simple tools too. A weapon is just a tool name
Evolution equips animals with all kinds of mechanical claws or jaws ripping opponent's heads left and right, or chemical weapons with all kinds of toxins or poisons. Observe power hierarchies of ants, chemical weapons of ants, wars of ants.
It seems like War and Weapons are just a naturally occurring side product of evolution everywhere and this buck probably suddenly doesn't stop with earth when we can see the same atoms and physic laws governing the rest of the observed universe.
Current human "Head in the sand strategy"
A head in the sand strategy is great and usually supported with "worked great so far" local minimum strategies until you actually reach the edge of the cliff. Natural instinct of every self-preserving politician or high-ranking military personnel for nearly 70 years has been to distance himself from any stigma-associated word that can drag his career down. Yet in light of new hard to ignore evidence and escalating military nature of those contacts. The head in the sand strategy can unfortunately only take you so far. Yes suppressing any mention of technology superior to US for years allowed enjoying "Top dog" position a bit longer but perhaps global cooperation and information sharing about vehicle movements, limits, and capabilities has strategically globally bigger importance.
A big rise in army verified sightings in nuclear military space and recently in 2019 even some conflict provocations.
A Fmr. Deputy Asst. Seccy of Defense of Intelligence describing the current situation. Essentially we are out of the observation-only phase and in 2019 clearly entered poking a stick phase.
A bit hysterical reaction? Perhaps. But if your neighbor is studying lock on your door chances are that he is not planning just ringing a bell to say hello?
So why is this happening?
Definitely not a one-trick pony
Given that we witness technology allowing unrestricted nightly covert movement over any house on the planet. And in the same time being recently so openly focused on learning about the best human military capabilities.
If they seem to manage things like warping space-time fabric as a means of propulsion. Which is one of the theories trying to explain why pilots observing them never heard the sonic booms or seen heat signatures as then there is probably no real interaction with air/water/gravity? and 600g is then not actually happening either?
Then In that light how unreasonable is it to expect much easier but logically expected tampering with something else. Like the ability to influence the behavior/decision-making of the select few in command due to obvious technological advantages surely not constrained only to propulsion and remote nuclear device tampering?
What mechanisms/tests/decentralization of power are in place to prevent such a situation?
Would it also not partially also explain why these frequent observations were so consistently dismissed for 70 years without any logical explanation just from the position of power? Isn't stigma in a way socially engineered construct paralyzing defense capabilities by making communication and information sharing inefficient?
So the important question arises immediately.
Why the sudden interest in our defenses and what will happen if we are no longer considered as a planet contained threat?
It's 2021. Yet look at human nature not changing at all from prehistoric times. Look at the continuing slaughter of civilians and children pretty being much ignored if not near you. Look how millions of vaccines are expiring in US selfishly refusing to share even manufacturing recipes in global pandemics while developing countries like India is in mass graves stage?
So what will happen if we actually start building those bases on the moon and on the mars before we get our racist bigot planets destroying selfish gene?shit together? Before we do major cleanup in our violent selfish DNA?
Whatever more advanced civilization recently started poking sticks to us.
It is probably thinking…