There's plastic everywhere including in your penis...but not in Amazon packaging anymore

Another fun episode of the Packaging Today show (every Monday am at 8:30 MST right here on the LInkedIn's BTW featuring me, Cory Connors ???? and EVELIO MATTOS )

We love our sponsors, but do me a HUGE favor. Go get educated on what Specright is doing and book a demo with them. There are so many CPG's out there right now about to get crushed by EPR bills and all because you didn't listen to me and get ahead of this with Specright. Trust me...it's coming! You'll be the packaging hero.

OK...ready to read what the AI Robots think we discussed on the Packaging Today show? If not, you can listen for yourself on Youtube

On to the article!

Packaging Today: Are Plastic Alternatives Worth the Hype?

Main Themes from the Transcript:

• The complexity of eliminating plastic pillows in favor of paper void fill.
• The multi-faceted challenges of sustainable packaging.
• The up-and-coming innovations in bioplastics and their broader implications.

The Plastic Pillow Debate: Jumping from Plastic to Paper Void Fill

The conversation surrounding the shift from plastic air pillows to paper void fill is heating up in the packaging industry. Amazon's decision to stop using plastic pillows, a staple in e-commerce packaging, has sparked considerable debate.

Evelio Mattos aptly highlights the issue: “If you are getting a battery like this big and you get a box that's this big, are the air pillows really the problem?” Here, Mattos points to the overarching problem of overpackaging rather than merely the material used for void fill. The core question revolves around whether paper can adequately replace plastic in terms of functionality, cost-efficiency, and environmental impact.

From a practical standpoint, Cory Connors weighs in with an important insight: “Instead of reducing the cost of the material, we went and showed them how to use less material.” This notion emphasizes the importance of not just swapping out materials but optimizing the use of packaging. Techniques such as blocking and bracing can significantly reduce the amount of material used, whether it’s paper or plastic.

A pivotal thread in this debate is the carbon footprint of each material. While paper offers easier curbside recycling, its production and transportation could potentially increase greenhouse gas emissions compared to plastic pillows. As Connors notes, “void fill should be used to block and brace the item inside in the right way and use the least amount of material every time.”

Balancing the Sustainable Packaging Quandary

The quest for sustainable packaging isn't straightforward, and the transcript reveals the multifaceted issues that brands must navigate.

Julia's poignant question encapsulates these dilemmas: “Does one protect the product better? Does one lower the carbon footprint? Does it improve circularity recycling?”

The trio touches on multiple variables:

• Consumer Expectations: Mattos highlights that consumers have to adjust their expectations: “The whole purpose of the box is to take the impact and look crappy by the time it gets to me so the product is still perfect.” Current consumer behavior often prioritizes aesthetics over functionality.
• Impact on Recycling Systems: Adam Peek discusses the broader recycling mechanism, emphasizing how cost and efficacy come into play: “Paper is better than microplastics in terms of curbside recyclability.” However, if not correctly managed, both materials can contribute significantly to landfill mass.
• Brand Responsibilities: All panelists highlight the pressure on brands to make the best environmental decisions while keeping costs manageable. Connors sums up the predicament: “Every one of these things is going to have somebody on the other side saying always.”

Innovations and Implications of Bioplastics

Exploring new materials like bioplastics derived from seaweed and algae provides a glimpse into the future of packaging. The transcript showcases a conversation about these innovative solutions:

Evelio Mattos raises a valid concern regarding the environmental impact of harvesting seaweed: “Are we going to do the same thing to the seabed that we've done to Forestry?”

Adam Peek, however, presents an optimistic perspective based on his interviews: “Growing seaweed is very efficient. It grows, some of them grow over a foot a day… without the need for any land.” The scalability and rapid growth rates of seaweed make it a promising resource, assuming the industry can manage ecological balance.

Cory Connors’s question about lab-grown algae highlights another angle for innovation: “Is that where maybe we're seeing an increase in algae-based plastics coming from?” If algae can be farmed without disrupting natural habitats, it could very well become a sustainable alternative to traditional petroleum-based plastics.

The biggest takeaway remains that each material—be it biodegradable plastic, seaweed-based, or conventional packaging—manifests unique implications within an environmental and economic context. The impending focus should be on balancing the benefits while minimizing the drawbacks.

Refining Our Approach to Sustainable Packaging

The drive towards redefining packaging practices is at an inflection point. The challenges and solutions discussed in the transcript illustrate that there's no one-size-fits-all answer.

Whether we shift to paper from plastic or innovate with bioplastics, it’s imperative that brands consider a holistic approach, weighing product protection, carbon footprint, and recyclability. Information and innovation must coexist to drive meaningful change in sustainable packaging. The discourse moves beyond just the materials to the necessity of reevaluating consumer expectations, optimizing packaging usage, and continually investing in research to develop new, viable solutions.

The transformative changes in packaging are not just about replacing one material with another but about instituting smarter practices globally. This intricate dance will require collaboration and continuous learning as the industry evolves to meet both environmental and economic objectives.