There's a hole in my (talent) bucket
David Hunt
Founder & MD, Hyperion Search | Executive Search & Talent Advisory | Helping Cleantech & Renewable Energy Companies Scale with Top Leadership Talent #Cleantech #Solar #EnergyStorage #EMobility #Renewables
Those who take their business or leadership role seriously know that life is much easier and business is much more successful with real talent in your team. The CEO’s of two of the most successful businesses in corporate history, Steve Jobs at Apple and Jack Welch at GE, were both very vocal about having A players on your team. Often I'm asked to write or speak about acquiring top talent. That stands to reason, it's what my company, Hyperion Executive Search does, help companies find the very best talent. But we also help clients to retain that top talent.
Finding and acquiring talent can be costly (although it should always be seen as an investment not a cost), so it's bizarre some companies devote so much time to acquiring talent, then don't know what to do with ‘it’, or how to manage ‘it’ and subsequently lose ‘it’. A bit like constantly filling a bucket with a hole in. Now that is an expensive business.
To maximise your investment in talented individuals your company needs to put in place a range of measures and processes, starting with on boarding and induction. These are critical, but I wanted to speak more about retention of existing talent. At Hyperion we provide a range of services and consultancy aimed at helping businesses to retain and maximise the impact of talented employees, but here are some of the key considerations. Like many of the most important practices in business they are not rocket science, but they are often overlooked.
I base my comments on nearly two decades of interviewing and consulting with talented candidates. Before I highlight the top three reasons I've found that talented people leave businesses I think it's worth also mentioning many of the memes I'm sure you would have seen on Linked In, Xing or other social media. In themselves they are often quite right, just this morning a great example popped into my timeline suggesting that good people stay when they are….
- Paid well
- Mentored
- Challenged
- Promoted
- Involved
- Appreciated
- Valued
- On a mission
- Empowered
- Trusted
I think each is vitally important and unhappy candidates are usually unhappy because a combination of these things is not present in their current role. You may or may not be surprised to hear that money is very seldom the key driver for talented people to want to leave. A factor yes, but rarely the most important one.
So what do talented people want and need to be happy, and therefore be driven to stay in your business?
AUTONOMY
Good people do not want to be micro-managed or inhibited from being creative in their job. You will often see comments that most people leave a job directly because of their immediate boss. Of course that can be true, but it can also be true that the ‘boss’ is just acting within or carrying out the company culture. It's easy to blame one individual, but it's the company culture that allows that manager to operate in that way. People expect to be managed, to be accountable, to have parameters and guidelines, but they also want the ability to get on with the job. They want to use the talent you employed them for, to be creative, to find solutions, in short they want some autonomy in their role to grow and achieve.
CHALLENGE
In the same vein good people want to be challenged. Not only do they want the autonomy to do their job, they want new challenges and situations to deal with and to learn from. Greater levels of responsibility or special projects in addition to their day to day activities. And a greater challenge doesn't just mean upping their targets or workload, it means new things to stretch their abilities and creativity. It is accepted that this is usually whilst also maintaining performance in their current role, but ultimately leads to promotion. In short personal and professional development.
RECOGNITION
Recognition and reward can and does come in many ways, salary and financial reward are an important part of the mix. Don't though expect to retain your superstars forever if you just throw money at them. If that's all there is after a while it feels pretty cheap. We have helped many, many good candidates to move over the years where a decrease in salary has been happily accepted for a more rewarding and challenging environment. Rewards and recognition warrants a whole blog and more in itself, but a whole raft of options are available and many if not most are free, or low cost to the business. How much does a thank you or pat on the back cost?
In short talented people stay where their talents are recognised, rewarded, nurtured, developed and encouraged. Not rocket science at all is it? But so very few companies have a culture or processes to make sure this happens, and that is why so many have a hole in their talent bucket.
? David Hunt
David Hunt is Managing Partner of one of the leading global executive search firms in the clean energy sector. He is also Chair of the Decentralised Energy Forum and a policy board member of the UK Renewable Energy Association (REA) and the Energy Storage Alliance.
Strategy|Innovation|Business Development|Design, build and Project Management Consultant. Product & Services Specialist- Renewable/Power/Energy/Infra Sector
8 年Now after this read the first one
Strategy|Innovation|Business Development|Design, build and Project Management Consultant. Product & Services Specialist- Renewable/Power/Energy/Infra Sector
8 年My previous comment just couldn't figure out here hence request to read below one first before the previous one as in continuation. Thanks David for good post specially the pic and the headline. In today's scenario the HR team is basically a Human Resource team and not HRD-Human Resource and Development team and they hire recruitment consultant for hiring which is okay but Development part is missing on HR team's part in most of the organisations. That's why it becomes very important for organisations to have a good leader in terms of CEO. Based upon my experience as senior my view first things a CEO should do: -
Strategy|Innovation|Business Development|Design, build and Project Management Consultant. Product & Services Specialist- Renewable/Power/Energy/Infra Sector
8 年Now comes the stage of measuring success. Here success should be measured by their results in stead of things like time spent on job etc. By giving flexibility they will be more committed to driving results that will benefit company and more likely to see and support the long term company vision. Last but not the least, seniors to whom employees are reporting should monitor the work progress for new jobs number of times in a day and later may be once in a day or two and then can ask the employee to seek advice if required. David check these with the like of Steve job and others who were successful as great mentor and Enterproneurs. Continous development programme enhancing employee's skill set also needs to be looked after by HRD team and it should not be mere HR team.
Helping leaders be assertive, confident, authentic | developing purposeful, effective teams | impactful executive coaching & group facilitation that gets results | it starts with a ‘Discovery Call’
8 年Autonomy is a great observation, I wonder if this should be "contracted" in some way, especially with new talent you have taken time and effort to recruit? Clearly they will be under supervision more, early in their tenure but I suspect that many will not see any relinquishing of this and end up being demoralised. No doubt that you and Hyperion help set expectations between your candidates and their new employer but in many businesses and public sector organisations it doesn't happen (I feel). Good blog.