Theorizing in journalism

The concepts of journalism have long sense made a hit in recent times, as well as making the stand in one of the most influential parts of the world recently, we've also been in the fields of many other things. some have gone so far as to theorize about things in different ways. in such practices as a result there isn't fully a guarantee about the information that we are given so we need to ensure that in this specific case when proposing a theory about something it needs to be clear that it is a theory about something.

as a result of this we can start to see the result of some of our work.

and we maybe wrong about a theory, in fact expect it to be wrong. your justifications and educated guesses all have the potential to be completely wrong, however it doesn't necessarily mean that it doesn't age that great. so that's why I ask to do the following. please ensure that whenever using your own properties or your own elements, remember that people will need reminding that this is your own perspective on something.

There are many theories in the journalism field, and many speculate that some are potentially fact however some need further investigation to clarify this, and if you do decide to theorize it changes the way that you present your data.

however in order to do so you need to remember that the theory element of it is just as clear as day, because of the fact that we live in an age of misinformation and unnecessary bias or actions towards something we can often feel like that sometimes when someone is trying to go straight to the point when something some of the things that are objective fact and some things which are Theory may cross the lines. so it's very important that it is clear for everyone.

the reason why I am writing about this is because according to multiple studies, inclusion acts follow the system where something needs to be addressed in such a clear way when someone has a different ability to someone else. this includes the presentation of data and how we articulate it. so if you are theorizing about something the element that you are theorizing about needs to be clear to the reader.

I love a theory, however it needs to be always clear as if the person knows and clearly understands about the whole thing. in digital media and communications there are many different elements to consider such as the accessibility acts, and ensuring the everyone can access the same information. it's important if you are looking at an article, to ensure that is just as accessible to everyone as possible and by this I mean to have a audio version of this ready, and to have the color schemes work psychologically to your advantage however be suitable for the colorblind people.

It is a very delicate balance of many different factors however I believe that working in this element allows us to design something accessible and much more influential to a wider audience, additionally this also offers a broader audience for you.

This is a fairly short one today, I just wanted to mention all of this because I feel that is important to consider about the fundamentals of clarity in theorizing.

Happy reading and have a great day.