Testing the Strength of Cohesive Soil - A Field Guestimate

It is impressive to me that Appendix A in Subpart P describes a method of classifying soil and rock stability with such simplicity that someone without a degree in geology can come up with a Type A, B, or C and can do so with confidence. What is even more amazing is that someone without a degree in geology can teach the subject to those needing to learn that skill. Once again, I find myself in awe at those who constructed Appendix A, and I applaud their success.

Testing the unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soils is just one example of this. Let’s look at a few takeaways on this from the standard. From Appendix A we find the following:

“Unconfined compressive strength?means the load per unit area at which a soil will fail in compression. It can be determined by laboratory testing, or estimated in the field using a pocket penetrometer, by thumb penetration tests, and other methods.”

The authors of Appendix A make the point that testing the strength of cohesive soils in the field is only an estimate. A lab test will be more accurate, but the field estimate is adequate when performed properly.

That last statement is key. Performing these tests properly gives us the best estimate, which is what we want. Appendix A also states:

“(iii)?Thumb penetration. The thumb penetration test can be used to estimate the unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soils.”

Here’s another statement:

“(iv)?Other strength tests. Estimates of unconfined compressive strength of soils can also be obtained by use of a pocket penetrometer or by using a hand-operated shearvane.”

In both statements, the word estimate is used, and rightfully so.

There are some helpful guidelines in Appendix A about how to conduct the thumb penetration test. The reader is encouraged to review those instructions. While there isn’t a lot said about using a pocket penetrometer in the standard, there are some key takeaways based on the totality of the discussion from terminology and phrases in Appendix A using inductive reasoning. Here are a few.

Only test the unconfined compressive strength of saturated cohesive soil. That means, only test the cohesive strength of soils that successfully pass the plasticity test.

Only test soils from the spoil pile that are freshly excavated and have not been exposed to either wetting or drying.

Take several samples and throw out the high and low readings. Choose average readings for final determination.

When using a pocket penetrometer, in order to get the most accurate reading, take an object and carefully cut a smooth side from the clay sample prior to inserting the penetrometer into the smooth side. This way we can more accurately see when the penetrometer has penetrated the sample the correct depth.

Do not stab the penetrometer into the soil sample. Simply use a smooth motion and push it into the sample the correct depth. Too fast or very slow will not provide the best estimate.

Follow the manufacturer's instructions completely when using a pocket penetrometer or a shearvane.

Never attempt to get a reading from the sides of the open excavation. We only test soil samples taken from the spoil pile.

Hopefully this has been helpful and has answered some questions. For more information on this and other excavation safety topics we refer you to www.trenchandexcavationsafety.com

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Jon Preston的更多文章

  • 15 Items that are Explained in the Federal Register of Supbart P (Excavations)

    15 Items that are Explained in the Federal Register of Supbart P (Excavations)

    Here are 15 topics that are important to excavation safety and are discussed more fully in the federal register than in…

  • What is C-60 Soil and How is it Legitimate?

    What is C-60 Soil and How is it Legitimate?

    First the quick and easy answer. What is C-60 soil? Most manufacturer’s tabulated data generally define C-60 soil as a…

  • JUST SKIP IT?

    JUST SKIP IT?

    I was in a discussion with a safety trainer, and we came upon a concept that he found to be difficult to understand. I…

    1 条评论
  • We’ve Arrived . . . Somewhere

    We’ve Arrived . . . Somewhere

    (I posted this article just a few days ago, and this very thing happened once again, today! So, I'm posting it again…

  • WHAT WE KNOW . . . OR DO WE?

    WHAT WE KNOW . . . OR DO WE?

    The need for safety training and employee development is a continuous and ongoing process. When we look at the training…

    2 条评论
  • Cave-ins - More than Being Buried

    Cave-ins - More than Being Buried

    We’ve Arrived . .

  • Trench and Excavation Safety by the Book

    Trench and Excavation Safety by the Book

    I just placed what could be the last print order for my book “Trench and Excavation Safety by the Book”. Print costs…

    3 条评论
  • A Deadfall Trap

    A Deadfall Trap

    We continue to see a number of unsafe excavations where the so called “protective system” is simply a couple of road…

  • Shoring, Shields, and Shoring Shields

    Shoring, Shields, and Shoring Shields

    Do you understand the difference between "Shoring" and "Shields"? This article first appeared some time back, but I…

    1 条评论
  • IT WOULD’VE HELPED ME TO KNOW

    IT WOULD’VE HELPED ME TO KNOW

    When I began working in the trench safety industry 30 years ago, I could not have had a better start. I worked for an…

    3 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了