Test your CI Age

Test your CI Age

An article on Fast Factory (whatever this is, maybe a grandson of Fast Company?) suggested several terms used in different eras that defined that period.

1942- Hyper

1943- Duh

1950- Beautiful people

1951- Nerd

1953- Hippie

1955- Cool

1956- Nitpicker

1961-Bratty

1962- Drop Dead (gorgeous)

Today, of course, Hyper and Bratty will be called ADHD and prescribed Adderall. “Beautiful people” and Drop Dead Gorgeous will be considered sexual harassment terms. Nerds will be labeled billionaires, Hippies will be loud quitters, cool mostly applies to being high, Nit-picker is a Karen, and only Duh remains.

Duh.

A quick test of how long you’ve been in my field

In competitive intelligence, my field, terms have also come and gone. Below is a very partial list. I challenge my readers to add to it. Since I haven’t gone to conferences for over a decade, and I don’t read articles/books on CI (not even mine), and I don’t post on CI groups or participate in CI forums and discussions or listen to podcasts (still waiting for a CI musical show), I am by definition a CI hermit. So, I have little chance to be connected with the current lingo. Let’s see if you are (put your 2-cent contribution in the comments section!)

@Luis Madureira, a true scholar, and a CIP-II among other titles (the title I give him is entrepreneur, the highest compliment one gets from me), identified dozens of different definitions and terms for CI that popped up over the years, for his Ph.D. thesis at Nova, a Portuguese university. (Side note: That’s why I left academia.) Instead, I focus on the few that I personally remember as someone who actually lived through the words that defined generations of CI. I absolutely expect my fossil remains to be discovered 60 million years from now clutching an iPad tablet with a carving saying, There is only one true CI. Historians will decipher the words and declare them the earliest evidence of the monotheistic concept of CI.

The evolution of CI terminology throughout the ages

3500 BC- Scouting (Old Testament)

1967- Environmental scanning (F. Aguilar)

1967- Organizational intelligence (H. Wilensky)

1980- Competitive analysis (M. Porter)

1985- Business intelligence (B. Gilad)

1985- Competitor intelligence (Leonard Fuld)

1986- Competitive intelligence (SCIP)

1988- Business intelligence system (B and T Gilad)

1999- CI platform software (Comintelli)

2000s- Marketing intelligence, strategic intelligence, market intelligence, sales intelligence, market and competitive intelligence (various conferences, various consultants)

2015- Competitive enablement (Klue?)

blah

blah

blah

-

2022- The Opposite of Noise (B. Gilad)

Let’s see who among my 3,800+ subscribers can add to this list. The winner will get an opportunity to buy my last book if they provide their email, bank account and credit card number as well as their social security number and date of birth (why wait until you are hacked? Be proactive!)

Alternative perspective: Call it whatever you want, as long as you are doing it right? Not necessarily. Jeff Deist’ terrific article in The Austrian, the Mises Institute’s publication, titled Evolution or Corruption? correctly argues that “Words are just a means to an end.” Deist’s criticism aims directly at political correctness- what George Orwell called “Meaningless Words” - by which the Left redefines, reshapes, and substitutes words that have no connection to the original concept, such as racism, equality (substituted with equity, a totally different meaning), and “social justice” among others. ?

On a much smaller scale, language corruption, apparently, hasn’t escaped my beloved CI. While CI has a precise meaning as competitive insight, calling everything under the sun competitive intelligence may sell products, software and services, but it is indeed, corrupted language...don’t let it corrupt your mind!

#competitiveintelligence #competitiveintelligencetraining

Guy Niri ??? ????

Competitive Intelligence | Marine Resources | Sharks & Batoids | Competitive Intelligence Lecturer

2 年

"why wait until you are hacked? Be proactive!" ...so true. My contribution for CI terminology sometime in the future : Organizational pain killer

回复
Nir Gendler

GM @ Optronics Global Ventures & TechEd Division in APAC | Dronacharya Tech-Hub - The Nexus between Industry & Academia | Think - it's not illegal yet

2 年

The 1988 term pushed me to a stalking CI mission - find who's behind the terminology (T&B Gilad- mmmm... CI runs in the family!). Conclusions: 1. I should buy that book (I have a copy of OON, so this is a nice complementary). 2. Wikipedia is not properly updated. 3. The mileage in this CI dessert counts a lot, now I understand where you draw your very sharp perspectives from.

回复
Kari Syrja

Profitable sustainability first

2 年

Who controls (influences/impacts/initiates) the Narrative, shapes the future. New CI becoming AI driven has less to do with intelligence, and more of Algorithimc Interdepence.?

回复
Kari Syrja

Profitable sustainability first

2 年

Ben thank you for lifting up Comintelli as industry pioneers ??????????

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Ben Gilad的更多文章

  • When CI is helpless

    When CI is helpless

    A friend sent me this hilarious clip of the British comedy show, Blackladder (featuring the indomitable Mr. Bean’s…

    16 条评论
  • Is your company under "competitive pressures"?

    Is your company under "competitive pressures"?

    One industry these days reflects the work of all change drivers at once: technological, government, social and…

    11 条评论
  • War Games in the Age of AI

    War Games in the Age of AI

    Can AI run a war game? Definitely. The question is what you expect from the war game.

    24 条评论
  • Prof. Klaus Solberg S?ilen: We are the superheroes of the new age

    Prof. Klaus Solberg S?ilen: We are the superheroes of the new age

    Part-II, the Feel-Good part, and also the end of this serious essay For those who missed Part-I, go read it. What, did…

    16 条评论
  • Which approach to CI fits your experience?

    Which approach to CI fits your experience?

    Part-I Note: This is a rather long and atypically serious post for me. If you are not in the CI space, feel free to…

    43 条评论
  • Porter in Action 4- the Last Frontier

    Porter in Action 4- the Last Frontier

    Change Driver: Rivalry In my workshop Competitive Blindspots I often place “competitive action” as the least important…

    15 条评论
  • Eureka! How CHATgpt helped me get an insight after 25 years!

    Eureka! How CHATgpt helped me get an insight after 25 years!

    Many people have a person who is their source of intelligence in the sense of either direct insight or material leading…

    31 条评论
  • Porter in Action- Part III

    Porter in Action- Part III

    In two previous posts https://www.linkedin.

    14 条评论
  • Can CI defeat AI??

    Can CI defeat AI??

    You bet. And for the entire forseeable future.

    36 条评论
  • Porter in Action-Round 2

    Porter in Action-Round 2

    The death of strategy In my Cross Competitor workshop for CIP?, I teach the use of a visual tool created by Porter…

    22 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了