Telling People What To Do Doesn't Work

Telling People What To Do Doesn't Work

Radical Respect is a weekly newsletter I am publishing on LinkedIn to highlight?some of the things that get in the way of creating a collaborative, respectful working environment. A healthy organization is not merely an absence of unpleasant symptoms. Creating a just working environment is about eliminating bad behavior and reinforcing collaborative, respectful behavior. Each week I'll offer tips on how to do that so you can create a workplace where everyone feels supported and respected.


Radical Respect describes the culture in workplaces that honor everyone’s individuality, rather than demanding conformity; and that optimize for collaboration, not coercion.

What makes it radical is that it rarely occurs even though it's well documented that telling people what to do doesn't work and command-and-control cultures create toxic workplaces where innovation goes to die.

No alt text provided for this image

Collaborate

Collaboration is essential to any great human accomplishment. Designing organizations that promote healthy collaboration requires proactive efforts to combat coercive behaviors from individuals and groups, such as arbitrary, ego-driven, fact-ignoring biased decision-making, bullying, harassment, and physical violence.

When we build management systems that put checks and balances on the power of leaders, they can be held accountable for their behavior and their results. Employees are not silenced.?

There is growing consensus that coercion, even by otherwise visionary leaders, neither gets the best results out of people nor generates the innovation necessary to thrive in the modern economy.?

Honor Individuality

If we want to benefit from each person we’re working with bringing their full potential to our collaborative efforts, we need to honor one another’s individuality rather than demanding conformity. None of us except actors can do their best work while pretending to be somebody they aren’t.

Yet too often we look for “culture fit” rather than “culture add” when we hire, making it difficult for our organizations to evolve, and excluding people who could make an important contribution. We often believe we want people who “think different,” but we’re more likely to punish outliers.?

Telling people to bring their best to work while discouraging them from being their true selves at work seems obviously ridiculous. But we do that all the time, usually unconsciously.??

Successful collaboration requires diversity of thought and experience. Part of the benefit of collaboration is that “many hands make a light load.” But the more important benefit is that it allows us to challenge each other because each of us has a different point of view, different life experiences. If we were all exact clones, we’d lose that benefit.?

This seems so simple, so obvious. Why then is the combination of optimizing for collaboration and honoring individuality so rare that I dub it radical? What gets in the way? What can we do to make it less rare? Let’s start by identifying what moves us in the wrong direction.

What Gets in the Way of Radical Respect?

No alt text provided for this image

Many things get in the way, but the three big ones are bias, prejudice and bullying . People often conflate bias, prejudice, and bullying, treating them as though they are synonymous.

For example, the term “microaggression” is useful in pointing out small injuries that add up to repetitive stress injury. The problem is, there are three different reasons why microaggressions happen: bias, prejudice, and bullying. You need to figure out what you’re dealing with in order to figure out what to do about it.?

To help parse the problem, let’s start with some simple definitions of each of the three different problems.??

Bias is “not meaning it.” Bias is unconscious. It comes from the part of our mind that jumps to conclusions, often reflecting stereotypes that we don’t believe if we stop to think.?

?Prejudice is “meaning it.” It is a consciously held belief, often rationalizing flawed assumptions and stereotypes.??

Bullying is “being mean.” There may be no belief, conscious or unconscious, behind it. Often it is the instinctive use of in-group status or power to harm, humiliate, dominate, or coerce others.?

Depending on one’s perspective these three problems carry different weight. For example, we are all biased, and bias usually doesn’t come with bad intent. So it’s tempting to dismiss bias as less severe than other infractions.

However, many report that bias happens so often that it becomes a repetitive stress injury that does more damage to them in their careers than either prejudice or bullying. Others have found prejudice or bullying looms larger in their experience. The point is that these are all problems that we need to solve, and comparing which one is “worse” than the other isn’t helpful.?

Furthermore, one often bleeds into another. There’s a fuzzy territory between unconscious thought and conscious belief. For example a woman I know is a nervous flier, and when her pilot is a woman, she feels more nervous. She rejects this intellectually and is aware of the irrationality of her emotional response, but it still happens.?

Also, belief, be it conscious or unconscious, tends to guide our actions. Sometimes there’s no belief, conscious or unconscious, behind bullying. It’s just an instinct to dominate. But bullying and worse can be emboldened by conscious prejudice, as occurred in the Jim Crow South. Or, a person might bully with biased language.?

R-E-S-P-E-C-T — Is Not Something That Needs to be Earned

No alt text provided for this image

The word “respect” has two very different meanings. The one I’m referring to is a “regard for the feelings, wishes, rights, or traditions of others.” This kind of respect is something we owe to everyone; it is not something that needs to be “earned.”? ?

We don’t have to respect a person’s opinion on a particular topic–we can disagree, vehemently. We don’t have to respect a particular action a person took–we can still disapprove and hold them accountable. But we do have to respect that person as a human being if we are to retain our own humanity. The other meaning is admiration for someone’s “abilities, qualities, or achievements.” That kind of respect does need to be earned–but it’s not what this post is about.??

All too often our biases cause us to expect conformity without even realizing what we are doing. And then when you layer management systems on top of that, that expectation gets baked into who we hire, promote, fire, and unconscious bias gives way to discrimination.?

When we are at our worst we seek to establish dominance or to bully others at work, rather than seeking to collaborate with them. And again when you layer management systems and power on top of those instincts, things go from bad to worse. Bullying gives way to harassment and physical violations and violence.

These are universal human failings. “Progressive” organizations drift toward coercion and conformity as surely as do “conservative” ones. But these problems are not inevitable.

The solution is to consciously design norms and systems that keep us moving toward respect and collaboration. Fighting the gravitational pull toward conformity and coercion requires much more than good intentions. We all have a role to play.




Alistair Evans

Now a retired Director at Weekly10 which was bought by Zensai | Passionate about Engagement | RCDD CDCDP | Frustrated and Retired RFU Coach | Road Cyclist

1 年

I would like to see more data about diverse teams being successful in their projects.?I am sure it is out there. What I have seen firsthand is the introduction of female personalities into engineering teams is essentially very positive. I would also echo Geoffrey's comments below about HR systems that recognize and reward individual accomplishments instead of team performance.?Developing systems that shine a light on the champions within a workplace from their peers is just not that difficult. Surprising how often it is ignored by HR. More food for thought... excellent read. ??

回复
Geoffrey Rhine

COO for Honey Do List & SCORE Mentor

1 年

Many organizations promote collaboration, but then have HR systems which recognize and reward individual accomplishment instead of team performance. Diverse team members bring different inputs to results, some bring financial results while others bring customer engagement and loyalty.

David Eccles

Head of Project Management Office

1 年

Kim, as you so often do, distil a real nugget for us to ponder and digest. Yes I am a BIG fan

Cathy Henkenberns, Ed.D

Leadership Development and Coach | Doctor of Education - EdD

1 年

Thanks for sharing this post. You offer many ideas to reflect on how organization leaders can bring out best in their team. Providing respect and space is the entry way and yet its so much deeper than that when one considers how problems are solved, and collaboration might be provided to encourage input.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察