Technical Writers: Understand Learning Styles
Curt Robbins
Senior technical writer and contractor. My clients include FedEx, Microsoft, Northrop Grumman, PNC Bank, USAA, and Wells Fargo. For hire. Deep experience with SOPs, training courses, AI, process flows, and white papers.
Thank you to all regular readers. If we're not connected, be sure to follow to never miss any of the five articles about technical writing that I publish every week, Monday through Friday at 1:00 pm Eastern/10:00 am Pacific. I never miss an article drop—and neither should you!
?? Listen to the sibling podcast where hosts Daphne and Fred provide insightful analysis and additional details on Amazon Music, Apple Podcasts, iHeartRadio, and Spotify.
In technical writing, the effectiveness of documentation and communications hinges not just on the content's accuracy and clarity (two of my Eight Pillars of Technical Writing), but also on how it resonates with your specific audience. Learning styles differ widely among individuals, influencing how they absorb, process, and retain information.
In today's article, we explore why some learners prefer textual content and how others lean toward audio. This highlights the importance of the ability of a technical writer to adapt their approach to cater to multiple learning styles. Different projects and deliverables will necessarily target different audiences. Different audiences will necessarily favor different learning styles. But in all honesty, all learning styles must typically be considered for nearly all documentation and communications projects.
Understanding Learning Styles
Learning styles are broadly categorized into auditory, kinesthetic (hands-on), and visual. However, even within these categories, there are nuances. For example, within visual learners, some favor diagrams and schematics, while others prefer text. Assume that your target audience is populated by a wide variety of learning styles and that your job, as an IT professional and documentation expert, is to cater to them all.
Auditory Learners
People who prefer audio find it easier to understand information when it is spoken. They process information through listening, which can make complex concepts seem more conversational and less intimidating. Audio also conveys tone, inflection, and emphasis, which are elements that can add layers of understanding not easily conveyed through text alone. Those with dyslexia (up to 44 million Americans) are a good example of an audience segment that can be reached via audio but not text.
Textual Learners
Textual learners find comfort in reading. Text allows them to control the pace at which they consume information, re-read complex or confusing sections, and absorb detailed explanations. The permanence of text helps this segment refer back to information without needing to rely on memory or external playback.
Text has classically been king of control in terms of the speed/pace of information consumption. However, the ability to modify playback speed on many audio interfaces (such as with podcasts and audio books) has negated some of this advantage for text.
领英推荐
Why Different Learning Styles?
A preference for text or audio information often stems from psychological, physiological, and cultural factors. It's a complex mix of genetics and environment involving nature and nurture. Everyone's brain is wired differently. Below are a few of the factors that influence learning style preference.
How Can You Adapt to Learning Styles?
Now that you understand how learning styles differ, how can you—as a technical writer—harness this knowledge to improve your IT and product documentation and communications? Below are a few strategies to help you accommodate different learning styles, improving your accessibility and inclusion and enlarging your potential audience.
Good Luck
Technical writers serve as bridges between complex information and various audiences. By considering the learning styles of your readers and listeners, you can enhance comprehension and engagement with those you are targeting.
Some argue the superiority of one medium over another. In actuality, all formats (including text, visuals, and audio) are characterized by distinct pros and cons, the appropriateness of which is mostly dependent on use case. The format that is best in one situation may be poor in another.
The true skill lies in your versatility and ability to offer content in formats that cater to different learning preferences. This approach not only broadens the accessibility of technical information, but also enriches the learning experience.
But that's just my opinion. Let me know your thoughts in the comments.
— Curt Robbins, Senior Technical Writer
P.S.: I'm currently taking on new clients. I enjoy helping companies with their documentation and communications strategy and implementation. Contact me to learn about my reasonable rates and fast turnaround.