Tech leaders discuss whether AI could end the world; And, young people don't believe in democracy
Market Watch
Four things:
Does AI pose a civilisational risk? Tech CEOs weigh in at closed-door meeting in Washington
Tesla CEO Elon Musk called for the establishment of a federal agency to regulate AI at a closed-door Capitol Hill summit involving several high-profile tech leaders.
The context: The summit, aimed at discussing future AI regulations ,?was closed to the press and attended by influential tech figures like Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, Sundar Pichai, and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, as well as leaders from labour and human rights groups
What they’re saying:?Musk stated, “The question is really one of civilisational risk. It’s not like … one group of humans versus another. It’s like, hey, this is something that’s potentially risky for all humans everywhere ... There is some chance that is above zero that AI will kill us all. I think it’s low. But if there’s some chance, I think we should also consider the fragility of human civilisation.“
Of note: The event marked the beginning of a series of AI Innovation forums — closed-door meetings where lawmakers can collaborate with tech leaders in order to build a foundation for bipartisan AI policy.
The other side: Some lawmakers across the political spectrum criticised the event for its private nature and for potentially enabling regulatory capture by allowing tech giants to shape the nature of AI regulation.?
Hi, I’m Gaurav Jeyaraman, the editor of this newsletter. We’d like to hear some feedback on our newsletter: what works and what doesn’t work? WhatsApp me directly and tell me what you think.
领英推荐
Young people are increasingly losing confidence in democracy: Soros poll
A recent?global survey ?by George Soros’ Open Society Foundations (OSF) shows that younger people increasingly believe that democracy is incapable of addressing their key concerns , such as poverty, inequality, and climate change.
In India, a striking 60% of respondents supported the idea of military rule as a viable means of governance, and 53% believed that having a leader who disregards parliaments and elections is an effective approach to running the country.
The big picture:?The survey’s findings indicate a generational divide in the perception of democracy’s efficacy.
Image credits: Open Society Barometer: Can Democracy Deliver?
Of note:?The poll demonstrated overwhelming support for the principle that discrimination based on appearance, religion, sexual, or gender identity is wrong, with approval ratings between 85% and 95% across all age and income groups.
Between the lines: While there could be myriad reasons to explain this, some possible factors at play could be high levels of youth unemployment and economic inequality that are driving perceptions of economic exclusion .
ICYMI