Teamership: A bias for proactivity
Great team members are always looking for ways to move from reactive to responsive and responsive to proactive. Photo by Brooke Cagle on Unsplash

Teamership: A bias for proactivity

There are generally three ways that any of us work. In order of least to most preferable, they are:

Reactive

When we are reactive, we are taking actions with little or no time to respond and typically attempting to mitigate actual or potential negative consequences.

Operating in this way is occasionally necessary, and never preferable. It drains energy and is an inherently short term solution.

Responsive

When we are responsive, we still need to move quickly but are able to consider how we will act based on events or decisions that have impacted us and our work.

Operating in this way is preferable to reactivity as we are able to utilise calendar and cognitive space to come up with better solutions. The feeling of reduced autonomy (because we are responding to the actions and impacts of others’ actions) impacts on the sustainability of operating in this way.

Proactive

When we are proactive, we are able to direct and influence important aspects of our work and performance.

This way of working is ideal for many reasons, not least of which is the fact that it is often intrinsically rewarding. Working proactively allows us to do more than the bare minimum, and work more in a way that we choose on things that we think are important and going to have a lasting impact.

Great team members have a bias for proactivity.

It’s not that they are always able to act in a proactive way, it’s that it is their preference. That means that they are always looking for ways to move from reactive to responsive and responsive to proactive. Often, we find ourselves lingering too long in a state of reactivity - or worse, seeking out ways to create a need for reactivity. That may sound weird, but so many of us enjoy being a firefighter and, as I have heard Dom Price of Atlassian say…

“Sometimes a firefighter becomes a firestarter”.

Some questions for you to consider this week:

  1. What percentage of your time is proactive?
  2. Do you have strategies to move from reactive to responsive to proactive?
  3. How can you help others develop a bias for proactivity?

Keegan

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Keegan Luiters的更多文章

  • Teamership: The power of clarity

    Teamership: The power of clarity

    Here are three ways to think about the way that you are approaching your work (I have written about these before):…

  • Teamership : Test your assumptions

    Teamership : Test your assumptions

    Assumption is the mother of all “mess”* ups. This is something that my wife has regularly shared…probably because I’m…

  • Teamership: Four myths about leading high performing teams

    Teamership: Four myths about leading high performing teams

    Most leaders want high performing teams for all of the benefits that come with them - better performance, learning…

    6 条评论
  • Teamership: Be bothered (selectively)

    Teamership: Be bothered (selectively)

    Rocky (my former PE teacher and now a mate) and Boomerang Adventures run great outdoor education experiences…

    2 条评论
  • Teamership: 25 ideas to lead teams better in 2025

    Teamership: 25 ideas to lead teams better in 2025

    I’ve written previously about how for teams… Rules suck. Principles rule.

    4 条评论
  • Teamership: Pragmatic, not dogmatic

    Teamership: Pragmatic, not dogmatic

    A simplistic (but often useful) way to distil our role in our teams is that we have two jobs: Making decisions…

  • Teamership: Just one thing

    Teamership: Just one thing

    I have recently discovered the late Dr Michael Mosley’s podcast, which is called “Just One Thing”. The premise is…

    4 条评论
  • Teamership: Gelato leadership

    Teamership: Gelato leadership

    On the weekend, I went to a local street festival with the family. There were market stalls including plenty of food…

    2 条评论
  • Teamership - A commitment to high performance

    Teamership - A commitment to high performance

    Don’t worry, this is not really about rugby league. There have and will be plenty more qualified people who analyse the…

    2 条评论
  • Teamership: 93% of organisations aren’t ready

    Teamership: 93% of organisations aren’t ready

    Research data in a 2019 report by global consultancy Deloitte highlights some interesting opportunities and gaps. The…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了