Are team-building exercises worth the trouble?
Flickr photo courtesy of U.S. Army RDECOM.

Are team-building exercises worth the trouble?

The leaders of Allergan’s Human Resources department—about a dozen of us—spent a weekend in the early 1990s at a retreat in the mountains somewhere not too far from corporate headquarters in Irvine, California. The retreat was designed to host a “ropes course,” an experience that’s supposed to help strengthen a team.

These courses—also called a “challenge course”—engage participants in outdoor activities involving cables, ropes, and obstacles, along with “low” activities (those that take place on the ground) such as figuring out how to forge a river. It’s all designed to (as one organization puts it) “develop confidence, trust, support, communciation, cooperation and leadership skills.”

I remember sitting back-to-back with the vice president of the Compensation department, arms locked, and being told we needed to figure out how to stand up without unlocking our arms. I have other vague memories of the weekend, including the heartfelt celebration when it was over. By God, we believed we had bonded as a team.

Two weeks later, we were locked in a room for seven hours working to cut the HR budget by some ridiculous amount. It turned out that all that “team-building” we’d gone through in the mountains had absolutely no bearing on our real-world reality.

I have always viewed team-building exercises with a high degree of cynicism. The cynic in me was ignited when I read that HSBC had fired six employees for creating a video in which five pretended to be ISIS members “beheading” the sixth. According to the report…

From the article: "In the video, one of the men shouts “Allahu Akbar” — Arabic for “God is great,” which is what has been said in some of the ISIS videos showing executions of hostages.  The banker playing the role of hostage is dressed in an orange jump suit and kneeling in front of the others with his head down, the same as some of the executed hostages. The other men are dressed in dark clothing with masks covering their faces. They give a whooping war cry and brandish what appears to be a coat hanger as if it’s a knife, and then break up into laughter."

The kicker: The six members of a London-based HSBC legal department created the video as part of a team-building exercise.

Did you ever wonder why sports teams don’t go out on team-building exercises? It’s because they bond as a team through the very act of being a team. No artificial exercise can replicate that. No ginned-up activity can help a team get better at what it was brought together to do.

In short, team-building exercises and activities are total bullshit.

Leaders who think this non-sequitur approach to team-building is necessary most likely are terrible team leaders. It might make them feel better to check off a box—“There, I’ve taken care of team-building”—but it does nothing to create the kind of team that can achieve great things in the context of their actual jobs.

Not many people love team-building exercises

To see if I was alone in this belief, I asked colleagues to share their team-building experiences. Here’s a sampling of the responses I got.

  • A communications retreat where we were given stripper names to use instead of our regular names. You should have seen the look on my very conservative boss’ face.
  • It involved people splitting up into pairs, standing face-to-face and making “mirror” motions. One person moves to the left, the other person moves to the left. One person holds up a hand, the other person holds up a hand. One hand moves in a circular motion, the other one…you get the picture. And no laughing or smiling. Just typing this description gives me the willies.
  • Making cardboard and duct tape boats in late October.
  • No joke, watching team members stretch latex gloves over their heads and try to inflate them the fastest.
  • I had one small tech company that sent us off on a “scavenger hunt” across a huge city park, and it was about 90 degrees. We were baking for an hour as we searched; it was real fun.
  • Forced Karaoke.
  • An entire management team on two houseboats for four days going through the locks in the Trent Severn waterway. Mostly men and three women. Made the mistake of letting the guys do the grocery shopping so lots of meat and junk food…no vegetables or fruit. After not showering for four days, we really got to know each other.
  • The everyone stand together, old hands, and try to untangle yourselves so you end up in a circle. Have done this a million times.
  • Our internal comms group had one team-building exercise that was supposed to identify positive and negative behavior. The goal was always to be “above the line.” No negative thoughts or attitudes were allowed. And our communications began to reflect this fantasyland, which only lacked unicorns, puppies and glitter. Needless to say, this exercise didn’t translate well to a group of trained journalists. Wait, I think I just dropped below the line. Damn!
  • Bowling, where trophies were awarded for best and worst. Seriously, is it not bad enough to finish last without having the humiliation of a trophy?

Then there was the individual who told me privately (with permission to include in this post) about an exercise in which the leader asked each participant to share a formative experience that led them to where they were today. Each team member proceeded to relay thoroughly horrific stories my friend—who was new to the company—found appalling and upsetting. My friend passed, unwilling to convey a similar experience to a roomful of near-strangers, and was ostracized for not engaging.

I have no doubt the experience may have been cathartic, but nowhere have I seen evidence that knowing the darkest moments your fellow team members have experienced helps the team function better.

Another friend recounted her own experience with a ropes course:

I am/was deathly afraid of heights. Still, I was determined. Mind over matter, etc. Very long story short, I was standing on the cut-off top of a tree (35-40’), had to leap to another tree and instantly grab hold of the rebar pegs to hang on to the new tree. {insert some weeping, cheering, self-doubt, whole-body shaking, and determination that swelled up from who-knows-where} I jumped. As my body slammed into the destination tree, my knee slammed into one of those rebar pegs. Technically, it went under the knee cap. Decades later, I still cannot walk/hike anywhere with much incline, have to avoid squats and lunges (and any other knee-challenging exercise). The End.

A thread runs through several of these recollections: Physical activities tend to favor those members of the team who enjoy and excel at physical activity; they also tend to favor extroverts. A bookish introvert can be an integral member of a team in the office. But he can be made to feel less a member of a team after participating in an outdoor challenge-based team-building exercise.

No doubt you have your own recollection of an unpleasant or pointless exercise in which you were required to participate that wound up doing nothing to strengthen your team.

(Side note: Several of the comments I received addressed Meyers-Briggs-type personality analyses. These are a separate issue. I may well tackle it one of these days.)

(Second side note: I have no problem getting a team together outside of work to blow off steam and have fun. In fact, a little extracurricular fun can have a beneficial effect. It’s the structured activities designed for team-building that make me nuts.)

How to really build a team

If we cancel all the team-building activities (and put the people who run those ropes courses out of work), what’s left? As one of the contributors to my thread on team-building exercises put it, ” The best team building is to work on a big, major work project together.”

Exactly. Success doesn’t depend on forging an imaginary river. Here’s what it does involve:

A great leader—The biggest problem most teams encounter is a leader who wasn’t selected for his or her leadership skills. Rather, they were promoted into the position as the next step on the pay scale. Imagine if NFL head coaches were selected that way. “You’ve done a great job as an assistant coach, Bob, but you’re at the top of your pay grade, so we can’t increase your pay without promoting you. So congratulations, you’re now head coach.”

Great hires—Ensuring the people you bring onto a team are right for the team is crucial. This doesn’t just mean they’re “team players.” They also must be able to field their positions well. Among the most repeated business axioms that drive crazy is the one that insists “There is no ‘I’ in ‘team’.” (I appreciate the retorts, “No, but there is a ‘me’,” and “No, but there is an ‘I’ in ‘win’.”) Teams have to work well together, but each individual also have to perform brilliantly in his or her job. Consider baseball. Working together is great, but if the second baseman can’t handle a line drive, the sum total of the team won’t amount to much. In their heyday, the Los Angeles Dodgers infield of Steve Garvey, Dave Lopes, Bill Russell, and Ron Cey emulated exactly what I’m talking about: crazy individual skill and a magical ability to work together that came not from weekend scavenger hunts but from hard work and the experience of working together over a long period of time. Watch this short video and listen to players talk about what made this legendary infield click: a Hall-of-Fame manager who saw something in them and kept them together.

 

 Clear goals and expectations—A team can accomplish a lot when they know what success is supposed to look like. It’s clear for a sports team: a higher score than the opponent. It should be equally clear-cut for a work team.

A real purpose—Team members need to know what it is they’re working to accomplish. What’s more, they need to have a sense that it’s something bigger than themselves, more important than their individual work goals.

The bigger picture—A work team is a small part of a large organization. Just as individual employees do, a team needs to know where it fits in the larger company narrative and how its work contributes. Even a baseball team is part of a larger organization that includes the front office, the coaching staff, the training staff, farm clubs, scouts, groundskeepers, and a host of others, all working towards a common goal: a great fan experience. How does the team contribute? By winning, of course. The stadium crew does it by maintaining a clean and inviting place to come spend an afternoon or evening. Everybody has a part to play. Everybody needs to know how their part contributes to the ultimate goal.

Autonomy—Great teams are not micromanaged. Leaders of great teams know how to coach and inspire, but not to guide every team action. If you have assembled a team made up of the right people, setting a goal and outlining the restrictions they’ll face (budget, approvals, etc.) should be 90% of the solution. Autonomy also means letting the team select its own captain. Hal Steinbrenner didn’t anoint Derek Jeter captain of the New York Yankees; his fellow players did.

Recognition—People thrive on intrinsic rewards. Celebrating milestones and taking every opportunity to recognize the team’s accomplishments can go a long way toward motivating the team to keep plugging on. Establishing mechanisms that enable members of the team to recognize one another is equally important.

Shared values—There’s no question that a lot of corporate values statements are bunk, especially those that clash with the reality of the workplace. But when team members bring the same set of values to the table—the same principles that guide the way they get their work done—amazing things can happen.

Common to all of these is a simple truth about teams: The best teams emerge from the work they were brought together to do. So enough with the ropes courses, bowling competitions, cook-offs, and other activities that are supposed to build teams but don’t.

Unless checking off the team-building box is more important than actually building a team.

Bert von Stockhausen

Docent MBO Handhaving, Toezicht & Veiligheid, at Curio

7 年

Extreme Outdoor activities like heights, and daring exersises are more efficient for personal development (as a volunteer!). Pushing your limits can be helpful to learn how to act in stressful situations develop perseverance and can make you less vulnerable, like they do in the armed forces. As a company you have to ask yourself; Do I want to build a team or improve the collaboration of my workers? There are 3 succes factors in team-learning (Bijlsma, 2009); -Team-action; that what you do, your work/project etc.., -Team-sensation; the feeling being a team and -Team-reflection; single/double/triple/loop learning (how a team learns) In the armed forces and law and enforcement they say; "train as you fight!" Science and learning literature tells you that skills are best learned in a realistic setting. Team-sensation & Team- reflection as seperate can (also) be achieved by doing fun things for example; outdoor activities, games and how to reflect on that . So fun and games can contribute to the feeling to be a team. Getting to know each other and interact and communicate in a different context. A BBQ/dinner, having a drink after hours, celebrating successes, etc. works as well! It can improve the relations of workers and can have a positive effect on communication, productivity, motivation. It will not improve the content skills! Teambuilding games can also be a great tool to proof something. As a Human Resource Developer, trainer and coach, I have used teambuilding games to orient on certain skills. It is my experience that often a team trained in a real setting can pitfall in their old behavior or focus their efforts to much on content than proces. It can help them to reflect to put them in a different setting. Important that you remind them to convert that to the real context. TIPS: Mach the game with the client group (don't go spool-nitting with the fire brigade) . Explain the learning objective of the game and not only the game target.

Ashley Zappe

Social-Cognitive Psychology. Sustainability. Collective Adaptation.

8 年

As an adult, I've been through a million irritating experiences like the one you describe (though, never a physically or emotionally unsafe one thankfully!). However, as a teacher, when I get a classroom full of dysfunctional, bullying, bickering, 12 year olds, I set up a series of functional team building games, and it is VERY effective. Taking young people and helping them intentionally develop communication, engage in metaphorical actions, problem-solve cooperatively, and reflect on the skills needed to function in a group is highly valuable. I've seen amazing things happen to group dynamics and saved myself a lot of trouble as teacher-referee by giving them these skills! But, the most important thing a facilitator does is read the group to figure out what they actually need--- clearly pressuring people too far beyond their comfort level, choosing activities that don't carry real value, or expect adults to develop deep trust with strangers for no real purpose... that's just poor facilitation. No one needs that. But there is still value in team building in other contexts, such as my students.

回复
Ian Brownlee M.Ed-TEO MEd-TD, MTNLP

Professor: en Talento-EPHOS (Jubilado)

9 年

At last, someone who has the guts to say what I believe many people think about team-building exercises: they are often bullshit based on some strange idea of what makes a team, are often totally overpriced and designed to be "different". However, the truth is that if someone can say "XYZ Company has done our course" it is often perceived as validation. I ALWAYS tell my clients: "Check with 3 or more previous clients of this potential supplier and then decide". Too often the real world is ignored in these types of training and no amount of debriefing can change "a sow's ear into a silk purse"

回复
Philip Lane

Non-Profit Liaison | Helping Non-Profits Align Their People And Processes With Their Vision Using Our Triple “S” Formula

9 年

I totally agree with Don. If the training providers are not expert in their field, then, I agree, the whole experience becomes a farce, and a fairly expensive one at that. With post-activity debriefs handled by a skilful facilitator, there is a no more effective way of adjusting attitudes and bringing about desired change.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Shel Holtz, SCMP的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了