Teachers don’t realise they don’t like creative students

Teachers don’t realise they don’t like creative students

Hey, thanks for stopping by. I write about evidence-based ways to get more from your creativity and build your innovation capabilities. You can find all my 100's of previous articles at www.ideatovalue.com

Every school will tell its students and teachers that they aim to promote creativity in their classrooms.

What their teachers might however not be aware of is that, in practice, they don’t actually want their students to be creative.

Might it be possible that even though teachers think that they are encouraging their students to be creative, that their actions and behaviour actually discourage creativity in their classrooms?

Sadly, the answer is yes.

In a breakthrough 1995 study , teachers from grades 1 -5 (students aged 6 – 11) were asked to assess their favourite and least favourite students against criteria that describe a typical creative individual.

The following list of descriptors of a creative child were put analysed and put together by university psychology departments, based on previous research into similarities seen in creative individuals:

Most Typical of a Creative Child:

  • Makes Up the Rules as He or She Goes Along
  • Is Impulsive
  • Is a Nonconformist
  • Is Emotional
  • Is Progressive
  • Is Determined
  • Is Individualistic
  • Takes Chances
  • Tends Not to Know Own Limitations and Tries to Do What Others Think Is Impossible
  • Likes to be Alone When Creating Something New

Least Typical of a Creative Child

  • Is Tolerant
  • Is Practical
  • Is Reliable
  • Is Dependable
  • Is Responsible
  • Is Logical
  • Is Understanding
  • Is Appreciative
  • Is Good-Natured
  • Is Sincere

Then, the teachers in the study were asked to rank their students from their favourite to their least-favourite [Note: I’m not sure how ethical that would be nowadays…] and compare each of their students against each of these descriptive criteria. The aim was to see which descriptions would be common for favourite students, and for the least favourite students.

The results were fascinating.

Teachers consistently ranked their favourite students with the descriptors for non-creative children, and their least favourite children with descriptors for creative children!

As the researchers concluded:

There was a significant negative correlation between the favourite student and the creative prototype. Conversely, there was a significant positive correlation between the least favourite student and the creative prototype

Or to put it more simply: Creative children were the teachers’ least favourite.

What is even more interesting is that the teachers were not even aware of this.

When these teachers were asked to list out what they thought would describe a creative child, they came up with the following list:

(I have highlighted the descriptors which are the complete opposite of the actual prototype characteristics of a creative child, listed above).

Teachers List: Most Typical of a Creative Child:

  • Is Individualistic
  • Takes Chances
  • Is Progressive
  • Is Determined
  • Is Sincere
  • Is Appreciative
  • Is Good-Natured
  • Is Responsible
  • Is Logical
  • Is Reliable

Teachers List: Least Typical of a Creative Child:

  • Is Practical
  • Makes Up the Rules as He or She Goes Along
  • Is Emotional
  • Is Understanding
  • Is Tolerant
  • Is Impulsive
  • Is a Nonconformist
  • Tends Not to Know Own Limitations and Tries to Do What Others Think Is Impossible
  • Likes to Be Alone When Creating Something New
  • Is Dependable

As you can see, teachers were listing characteristics like “is logical”, “is reliable”, “is responsible” for creative children, when in fact this was completely wrong.

What teachers thought they were describing the characteristics of a creative child, they were in most cases actually describing the characteristics of non-creative children.

This paradox, that teachers say they like creative children when in fact creative children display their least-favourite characteristics, has been seen in several other studies (1999 and 2013 ) as well.

But why does this paradox exist?

Well, it seems to be related to the anti-creativity bias .

People think that they should like creativity, but they do not like the reality of the challenges that come with dealing with creative individuals.

In the classroom, some of the characteristics of creative children, like the fact that they are non-conforming, emotional and making things up as they go along, can make the job of a teacher trying to impart knowledge on an entire classroom at once more challenging.

They are likely to be interrupted, questioned, challenged and distracted more than with more conforming, less creative children. This is often called out as being “disruptive” to the flow of the class and hurting the ability of other children to learn.

[As a side note, I want to tell a quick story. When I was in school, I was extremely curious. I was constantly raising my hand to answer and ask questions in almost every class. This irritated one of my teachers so much that she set a limit on me only being able to ask up to 3 questions per class! And once she told this to my other teachers, they thought it was a great idea and also limited my ability to ask questions! As a result I needed to get even more creative and learn ways to get information through probing statements and requests rather than questions…]

This means that creative children take more mental effort to teach, compared to less creative children. As a result, teachers prefer teaching less creative children, as seen by the “favourite student” assessment above. And children pick up on these cues, slowly noticing that prototypically creative behaviour is frowned upon, while less creative behaviour is more positive.

And this is likely also a reason why schools actively try to train the children to act in a way which is characteristic of a less creative child: Just memorise what we teach you and give the correct answers on the test.

So while teachers might outwardly say they support creativity in their students and their classroom, and while they actually believe what they say, their actions represent the opposite.

As a result, creativity scores appear to be falling across the world as schools punish creative behaviour and try to focus children on getting better test scores by memorising answers.

So if you are a teacher, headmaster or even a manager looking to continue the development of your people, please take a moment to look inward and ask yourself:

Am I willing to expend a little bit more mental energy dealing with the disruption which is a natural part of creativity, in order to continue really encouraging the curiosity and creativity of my students & team?
Or am I willing to shut down their creativity just so that I can have an easier job?

I hope you make the right choice.

Carian van der Sman

Brengt creativiteit in gezondheidsnetwerken

2 年

Rens Krikhaar leuke post voor jou!

Billy Grierson

Helping you think out of the box and act in the box. Experienced facilitator and trainer in problem solving & innovation

2 年

Nick, your article reminded me of one that I published several years ago, based on the same article you refer to. It took a bit of searching to find it, but this is it https://www.dhirubhai.net/pulse/why-dont-teachers-like-creative-pupils-billy-grierson/. Any questions, comments, challenges welcomed.

回复
Pramod Panda

Independent Director,capacity building,former Principal Chief General Manager, Corporate Governance, financial regulation & supervision, Compliance, Governance

2 年

Many thanks for sharing this. It is revealing!

Billy Grierson

Helping you think out of the box and act in the box. Experienced facilitator and trainer in problem solving & innovation

2 年

Many thanks for this Nick. The paper you refer to is one of the key publications in this area, but it has to be read in conjunction with the follow up, (V. L. Dawson, T. D'Andrea, R. Affinito and E. L. Westby, “Predicting Creative Behavior: A Reexamination of the Divergence Between Traditional and Teacher-Defined Concepts of Creativity,” Creativity Research Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 57-66, 1999. ) The standard interpretation of these papers is as you suggest - teachers don't like creativity because it makes it harder to manage the classrom. However, an alternative explanation is that their model for creativity, includes the skills needed to produce something valuable from the creative thinking. Working well with others in the classroom, or in business, is important to get value from creative thinking.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Nick Skillicorn的更多文章

  • We are living in a post-Truth era

    We are living in a post-Truth era

    I do not often talk about politics, but I am worried about the way the world is developing. Donald Trump was announced…

  • Are you selling "Vitamins" or "Painkillers"?

    Are you selling "Vitamins" or "Painkillers"?

    Many startups and innovators struggle to sell their products once they launch. Often, this is because while they love…

  • Who is more creative: Men or Women?

    Who is more creative: Men or Women?

    When it comes to how society views creativity, there is unfortunately a clear stereotype of who is most creative. For…

    3 条评论
  • Maker's schedules, Manager's schedules and why meetings can destroy productivity

    Maker's schedules, Manager's schedules and why meetings can destroy productivity

    How you prioritise your work is one of the major ways you determine what you get done. Different people require…

    4 条评论
  • Nothing creative is guaranteed to be a success

    Nothing creative is guaranteed to be a success

    Every time you produce something creative, there is a high chance that it might fail. It doesn't matter if it is an…

  • How would YOU improve chess?

    How would YOU improve chess?

    Imagine this. You work for a board game manufacturer, and you have been asked to improve the sales of your chess games.

    5 条评论
  • When your imagination is beyond your skill level

    When your imagination is beyond your skill level

    Recently my toddler has begun playing with Duplo, which is Lego for really young children. And while usually he loves…

    5 条评论
  • When should you play a character of yourself at work?

    When should you play a character of yourself at work?

    When your audience thinks of you and what your work represents, who do they think of? It does not matter if your…

  • Focus on doing fewer things in order to make progress faster

    Focus on doing fewer things in order to make progress faster

    Often, when trying to make progress towards an innovative challenge there are thousands of things you could be doing…

    2 条评论
  • Is Design Thinking dead?

    Is Design Thinking dead?

    A few weeks ago, I saw an article in Fast Company about the layoffs at IDEO, one of the world's most respected Design…

    25 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了