TDCommons: A Treasure Trove of IP

TDCommons: A Treasure Trove of IP

If you talk to a corporate patent attorney about why the company files patents, you may hear things about building a defensive portfolio, creating valuable long-term assets, or protecting key developments from exploitation by competitors. But increasingly the top priority of the company regarding IP is "Freedom to Operate".

Put simply, most businesses just want to operate their core business well and not be impeded from doing that. Patent licensing/revenues are not a major consideration for most and litigating patents are incredibly expensive (monitoring the market for violations and engaging in multi-year complex lawsuits, etc). Even filing a patent typically takes about three years and around $20,000.

The United States used to be a "first to invent" regime, which meant that if you had invented something and carefully recorded it, say in a signed and dated journal, that could be pulled up later and used as prior art. Whoever thought of the idea (and wrote it down) first had priority. This meant that the main focus in innovation was simply writing down your idea somewhere. The downside of this was having to undergo discovery for these journals and this work in order to maintain freedom to operate if some counterparty were to hit you with a bogus infringement suit for IP that you had already invented.

On March 16, 2013, the US became a "first to file" regime, which instead gives priority to whomever first files an application for the intellectual property with the PTO. Now simply having well-organized inventor journals is not sufficient to defend your IP - you actually have to have it filed, or otherwise available to an examiner as prior art in order to block a competitor's claim.

The latter part is the interesting bit that is yielding a shift in IP strategy at some of the larger companies - if a large company's primary goal is to ensure freedom to operate (vs exclusive use of the idea) a full, formal patent may be overly cumbersome and expensive - simply publishing the intellectual property (in the commons, royalty-free for anyone to use) in some well-defined location that is known to patent examiners could suffice.

That's exactly what the Technical Disclosure Commons site is (or "TDCommons"). It's a central repository for companies big and small to post "defensive publications" (or "DPubs") that contain potentially patentable material where the author or author's company want to preserve freedom to operate cheaply by making the material freely available to the public. This then gives incontrovertible evidence of a publication date for use in establishing prior art.

One of the best parts about this as an inventor is that it is not only much faster and cheaper to file DPubs but that it's totally okay to share DPubs with fellow inventors and read other people's DPubs, since all the IP is free-to-use.

That last bit should make you wince a little bit, since the ostensible point of the US Patent & Trademark Office was to allow inventors to freely share technical details with each other without fear of being ripped off, but any modern corporate patent lawyer will tell you that the first piece of advice they give to new inventors to the company is to never read other people's patents. The reason why is that if a counterparty can show "willful infringement" - namely that a counterparty read a patent, implemented the patent, and did not license the use of the patent - that not only are there treble damages but there's also an inversion of the burden of proof: the violating party that read the patent has to prove to the courts that even though they were aware of the other party's patent, the invention doesn't violate any of the claims of the patent. (In a typical case it is up to the plaintiff to demonstrate that the defendant's invention constitutes a use of the plaintiff's IP.) This makes the case much more risky and expensive and consequently the best way to ensure that your inventors aren't "tainted" with other party's IP is to have them never read any patents, ever. Sigh.

A disclosure commons gives us back this open IP sharing environment, at the price of loss of exclusivity and control. For most businesses simply looking to preserve their own freedom to operate, it may be a tradeoff that makes sense.

To wit, here are some of my own TDCommons publications, which you are free to peruse and enjoy with no fear of IP taint: (note the author is listed as "NA" for many of these; several companies decide to mask authors when publishing)

David Galiel

Musician. Designer of Communities-of-Practice. Strategic Planning, Management, and Board Governance Consulting for Community-Based Organizations (CBO) & Civil Society Organizations (CSO)

6 年

David, thanks for sharing info about tdcommons. I've always operated in the spirit of R. Buckminster Fuller, who patented things only to prevent others from sitting on his inventions that were intended for the benefit of all humankind. I've used Creative Commons to share non-patentable ideas, but cannot afford patenting of other IP I would like to make available to all. Tdcommons seems like just the thing!

回复
Avery Pennarun

CEO @ Tailscale: private, multipoint WireGuard networks made easy.

6 年

Thanks! Huh, I thought Denton had also put the Wifi Taxnomy thing on tdcommons.org, but apparently it's just a public paper, not specifically a defensive publication.? I have no idea what the difference is, but I suspect either one should make it hard for someone else to patent.??https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.01725 I think the TCP team's BBR work followed a similar path.

Denton Gentry

Engineering Leader between roles | Executive Leadership

6 年

We published wireless throughput measurement on TDcommons:?https://www.tdcommons.org/dpubs_series/127/

要查看或添加评论,请登录

David E. Weekly的更多文章

  • Apple Sep 2022 Announcement / Reactions

    Apple Sep 2022 Announcement / Reactions

    Amazing: Didn’t see the Watch Ultra coming - amazing battery life and durability, astonished that they’ve obsoleted…

    8 条评论
  • The Metaverse is a Bad Idea

    The Metaverse is a Bad Idea

    ‘Ready Player One’ described a dystopia. Why did we forget that before beginning to build a world of headsets and…

    19 条评论
  • So. Meta.

    So. Meta.

    The Meta announcement is interesting and unexpected. I was sure we'd see an Alphabet-like non-committal name that would…

    10 条评论
  • Learning & Proficiency

    Learning & Proficiency

    This morning I was reflecting on the fact that it has been some 20 years since my primary job was computer programming.…

  • Staying Secure in 2021

    Staying Secure in 2021

    How can you make it less likely you’ll be hacked? Only a fool would describe any setup as “hacker proof”, but with…

    2 条评论
  • TELI: Bridging Silicon Valley & DC

    TELI: Bridging Silicon Valley & DC

    On Wednesday evenings for the past few months I have been part of a new class run by the Aspen Institute where a small…

    8 条评论
  • Why Corporate Incubators Fail

    Why Corporate Incubators Fail

    My name is David Weekly. I’ve been in Silicon Valley for nearly 25 years now, invested in 60+ startups, created mexican.

    11 条评论
  • David's Take on the iPhones 12

    David's Take on the iPhones 12

    Mostly, it's a bunch of iterative improvements and polish. It's not a revolutionary new phone but it's definitely a…

    2 条评论
  • #GivingTuesdayNow 2020

    #GivingTuesdayNow 2020

    Happy #GivingTuesdayNow, folks! Some of you may not be in a position to give; for those of you that are - that have…

  • The Next Chapter

    The Next Chapter

    Friends; after four great years at Google (and before that a year and a half of great times at Facebook) it is time for…

    44 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了