Taxmann Daily – Editorial Team
Dear Reader,
Today’s newsletter analytically summarizes the top stories reported at taxmann.com.
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) notifies the Cost of Inflation Index (CII) every year. It is used to compute long-term capital gains/losses wherein the cost of acquisition/improvement is indexed with reference to the applicable CII of the relevant year.
The CBDT has notified ‘331’ as CII for the Financial Year 2022-23.
CII of 331 shall be used to compute long-term capital gains or losses on the capital assets which have been or are planned to be sold during the financial Year 2022-23. The CII for the last financial year, i.e., the financial year 2021-22 was 317.
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) vide F. No. 500/09/2016-APA-I, dated 07-08-2020 had issued the Mutual Agreement Procedure ('MAP') guidance for the benefit of taxpayers, tax practitioners, tax authorities, and competent authorities (CAs) of India and of treaty partners. The MAP guidance was presented in the following four parts:
a) Part A: Introduction and Basic Information;
b) Part B: Access and Denial of Access to MAP;
c) Part C: Technical Issues; and
d) Part D: Implementation of MAP outcomes.
After the issuance of MAP, stakeholders had raised queries on certain related aspects of MAP, which were not covered by existing guidance. Some partner countries had also requested clarity on certain issues, such as the consequences of the Vivad se Vishwas scheme on MAP.
Considering all these inputs, the CBDT has decided to update the MAP guidance. The following changes have been introduced in the existing MAP guidance:
1. MAP and Vivad se Vishwas Scheme
A new point (f) has been added in Section II of Part B to the MAP guidance to clarify the interplay between MAP and Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas (VsV) Act. Under this newly added point, the following has been provided:
a) Where a resident taxpayer opted for VsV Scheme for settlement of a case that involves the resolution of transfer pricing adjustments on international transactions, and it is accepted by the tax authorities of India, the competent authorities of the other countries may accept MAP applications from their taxpayers (which are AEs of the Indian taxpayer), and notify the competent authorities of India.
b) The competent authorities of India would allow access to MAP but shall not deviate from the result arrived under the VsV. Instead, they would request the competent authorities of the treaty partners to provide correlative relief.
c) Competent authorities of India shall not provide access to MAP to a non-resident taxpayer who has opted for the VsV scheme on the same issue, because the applicant has given up its legal right to access MAP.
2. New Part E: Applicant’s responsibilities
A new Part E has been added to the MAP guidance to highlight MAP applicants’ responsibilities. The responsibilities of MAP applicants are as under:
2.1. Responsibility for making true disclosure
The updated guidance provides that in item (k) of Form 34F, the applicant should provide all the facts of the case that can materially affect the negotiation process.
For instance, if adjustments have been made to the same international transaction by Indian tax authorities as well as its treaty partner’s tax authorities, the competent authorities of the two countries can be blind-sighted in negotiations if the applicant only mentions adjustments in one jurisdiction and leaves out the crucial fact of adjustments in the other jurisdiction.
2.2. Responsibility to provide up-to-date information
The applicant must keep the competent authorities as up-to-date as possible on all material changes in the information or documentation previously submitted as well as new information or documentation relevant to the issues under consideration.
Making all relevant documentation and information accessible to a competent authority will assist the smooth and efficient operation of the MAP process.
If any element of the MAP guidance comes in conflict with the domestic legislation, rules, instructions, and circulars in India or with the DTAAs entered into by India, the provisions of such domestic legislation, rules, instructions, and circulars or the DTAAs shall prevail.
That’s it from us for today! Stay Tuned for more updates from?Taxmann.com
Register Now for Taxmann’s Classes | [Virtual] Workshop on Investigation, Coercive Recoveries & Constitutional Rights under GST
1 Day | 1 Session | 1 Speaker | 180 Minutes
?? 09th July 2022 | ?? 11:00 AM – 2:00 PM (IST)
Fees: ? 795/- + GST @18% Extra
Register Now (Limited Slots Available): https://taxmann.social/FwaY9
Faculty:
? Abhishek A Rastogi – CA & Advocate | Partner – Khaitan & Co.
He is an SRCC graduate, a CA and a dynamic advocate with more than 22 years of experience with E&Y, PwC and Khaitan & Co. In the last five years, he has to his credit approximately 300 interesting writ petitions and is known as a constitutional expert for tax and fiscal issues. He has received various prestigious awards, including Economic Times 40 under Forty, World tax award, Asia Legal Development (top 50 Indian lawyers) for two consecutive years, Legal Era 40 under 40 and the International Tax Review Award.?
Key Learnings:
?? Powers of GST Authorities for Inspection, Search & Seizure
?? Summons under GST
?? Handling Coercive Recoveries
?? Powers of Authorities to Arrest
?? Remedies for Taxpayers (Constitutional & Statutory)
?? Judicial Intervention for necessary Protection
?? Case Studies & Specific Averments