Taxmann Daily – Editorial Team
Powered by Taxmann.com

Taxmann Daily – Editorial Team

Dear Reader,

Today’s newsletter analytically summarizes the top stories reported at taxmann.com.

Reassessment can’t be vitiated on ground that Sec. 151 approval letter was received by AO after issuing notice: HC

Sahara Credit Cooperative Society Ltd. v. DCIT - [2022] 141 taxmann.com 384 (Allahabad)

The assessee was a multi-state co-operative society. It had filed its return of income which was processed and an assessment order was passed.

Later, a reopening notice was issued on the ground that the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of deposits received from its members and shareholder's fund were not verified with relevant documents.

Assessee filed writ petition contended that notice was issued on 22-3-2021 by DCIT whereas letter written by member CIT communicating approval under section 151 for issuance of notice was received by Assessing Officer (AO) on 24-3-2021. Thus, on the date of issuance of notice i.e., on 22-3-2021, AO was not having any approval/sanction.

The Allahabad High Court held that there was no need for the paper containing approval to be received physically before issuing the notice. AO can proceed to issue a notice under section 148 if the approving authority has granted his approval and such approval has been communicated to AO in any manner including by uploading it on the portal of the department.

The notice issued under section 148 is not vitiated on the ground that the paper containing approval under section 151 was received by AO after issuing the notice.

Thus, the notice issued under section 148 as well as all the procedures undertaken in consequence of the notice did not suffer from any such illegality to warrant any interference by High Court.

A wrong claim of exemption under sec. 10(23C) would not debar trust from getting registration u/s 12AA: ITAT

Sanatan Dharam Sabha v. CIT (Exemption) - [2022] 141 taxmann.com 368 (Delhi - Trib.)

Assessee-society, engaged in carrying out charitable and religious activity, filed an application seeking registration under section 12A. The Commissioner (Exemption) rejected the same on grounds that the assessee had without any approval wrongly claimed deduction under sections 10(23BBA) and 10(23C)(v).

Aggrieved-assessee filed the instant appeal before the Tribunal.

The Delhi Tribunal held that a wrong claim of exemption under sections 10(23BBA) and 10(23C)(v) would not debar the assessee from getting registration under section 12AA as registration was not dependent either upon section 10(23BBA) or 10(23C)(v).

What is required to be examined at the time of grant of registration, as per the provisions existing at the relevant point of time, is the genuineness of the activities of the trust or institution and the objects of the trust.

The so-called infraction pointed out by the Commissioner (Exemption) such as the claim of exemption under section 10(23BBA) and section 10(23C)(v), neither impinges on the genuineness of the trust nor it is charitable/religious nature.

In case, the assessee claims the wrong exemption, it can be dealt with appropriately under the relevant provisions of the Act. However, a wrong claim of exemption, by itself, cannot debar the assessee from getting an exemption under section 12A.

That’s it from us for today! Stay Tuned for more updates from?Taxmann.com

Taxmann's Live Webinar | Equalisation Levy

#TaxmannWebinar #EqualisationLevy

Join Taxmann's Live Webinar | Equalisation Levy

?? 3rd September 2022 (Saturday) | ?? 05:00 PM – 06:00 PM (IST)

?? Register Now for FREE! (Limited Slots Available) https://taxmann.social/dwCZa

?? Coverage of the Webinar:

?? The genesis for the work undertaken by the OECD under Pillar 1 and Pillar 2 of the Inclusive Framework

?? Interpretational issues arising pursuant to the widening of EL

?? Classification of income – Royalty/FTS vs EL

?? EL vs DTAA – Beneficial provisions

?? What retaliatory measures USA has taken against India's EL

?? Case Study 1 | E-Commerce Operator – Marketplace vs Inventory Model

?? Case Study 2 | Bundled Transactions – Specified Services and Others

?? What next?

?? Speaker:

? Pankaj Sancheti – Founder |?Kevalin Consultants

With over 19 years of professional experience with Big 4 consulting firms in corporate taxation, transfer pricing and regulatory matters, Pankaj has served various Indian and global companies in different industry verticals.

Pankaj is extensively involved in advising foreign MNCs on Indian inbound investments, tax-efficient financing & repatriation structures and controversy management.

?? Relevant For:

? Tax Professionals

? Revenue Officers

? Chartered Accountants

#TaxmannUpdates #OECD #DTAA #BEPS #Tax #eCommerce

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Taxmann的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了