Tawiskaron
Photo by RLA Archaeology

Tawiskaron

Sometimes an idea has to chase you around for awhile before it sinks in.

I spent some time recently in northwestern Ontario on a project that required considerable engagement with the local Indigenous community. One band member in particular took a shine to us and, over the course of the week, crossed that happy threshold between business acquaintance and friend. Towards the end of the project, he took us for a ride in his boat to show us his community and his favorite hunting and fishing spots. Midway through our adventure, a loon with two chicks swam a parallel course to the boat. Our friend and guide looked at them and remarked, "there goes my brother and his children." Then he went back to showing us the scenery. No smiles. No sarcasm. No sign he was being ironic. Just a simple statement of fact.

I have seen this before - but I wasn't paying attention.

Just before the pandemic, I was at a conference which was held in the traditional and treaty territories of the Six Nations of the Grand River - the Haudenosaunee. The event was opened by a community member who delivered the Ohenten Kariwatekwen, a traditional prayer which means “the words that are spoken before all others” and is delivered at the beginning of every important gathering to remind attendees to be thankful for the entirety of creation. At the end of the prayer, which can last 15 minutes or more, this community member explained to us that he hoped we might come to understand the way in which his traditions mattered to how he walked in the world. "I hear Settlers talk about being afraid of the dark when they go out in the night," he said. "This is not a thing I experience. When I am out late, and I look up and see the moon, I know I am with my grandmother and I am never scared."

Thirty years before that, as part of my undergraduate training, I had to learn the Wendat creation story (which has many parallel elements to that of the Haudenosaunee and even some of their Anishinaabe neighbors). Creation began when Sky-Woman fell to earth and the animals built Turtle Island for her so she could have a home on land. Sky-Woman had a daughter who became pregnant with twins - a good twin and a bad one. The bad one was a problem from the start. His name was Tawiskaron. Before he was even born, he clawed his way out of his mother and killed her. As the good brother Jouskeha went on to create beautiful and useful things, Tawiskaron followed along behind to sabotage his works. One created fish, the other put bones in the fish; one made crops, the other blighted them, and so on. Eventually Jouskeha killed Tawiskaron. As he died, his blood fell on to the ground and became flint. Intriguingly, the word Tawiskaron means "flint." Thus, when a Wendat traditionalist holds a piece of flint in their hand, it isn't just a rock - it's a physical connection to a story about how the universe came to be.

For me, it's a rock. And that is the problem that lies at the heart of archaeology and heritage management. The people who only see rocks are the same people who write the rules for how Indigenous heritage is to be explored. In archaeological consulting, much of that exploration means measuring our results against provincially-determined benchmarks to determine which sites have cultural heritage value or interest (CHVI) ...and which sites do not. Once a site falls into the latter category, it can safely be removed from the landscape. It can be destroyed. It's all very clinical and objective. And it's a system that doesn't know how to accommodate an outlook in which a person can be related to a water bird or the moon.

That an object, place or activity could have simultaneous, non-competing meanings in the spiritual/symbolic realm (mythos) and the practical one (logos) is a textbook example of so-called pre-modern thought?- a term that seems smug at its best ...and racist at its worse. (I'm eager to see it replaced but we seem stuck with it for now). In pre-modern thought, words, and especially names, have a power to them that can link people, places, and activities to the symbolic realm in ways which can seem utterly baffling to the so-called modern or Western mind.

To MY mind…

The only experience in my world that comes even close happens on those rare Sunday mornings when I am given a piece of bread and some wine that I am told is the body and blood of a god who also happens to be his own father. I say it comes close because, to me, that part of the ritual just doesn't track. To me, it's just a piece of bread. I wish I could see it otherwise, but I seem to lack the mental apparatus to do so. It's like being colour blind, but instead I am culture blind. There is a richness, nuance, and connection to tradition that I will simply never be able to experience as adherents do. As a lapsed Christian, I'll be fine. I don't know what I am missing anyway. But that is my choice: it wasn't forced on me.

We Canadians take our religious freedoms seriously. The idea that a non-practicing outsider could make pronouncements on the validity of Jewish dietary laws, Christian holidays, Hindu practice or Islamic doctrine is so outrageous as to be absurd.

And yet...

Indigenous heritage cannot be neatly picked apart from their ritual and symbolic lives. Nevertheless, the First Nations are forced to accept that the rules for how their heritage is to be explored, measured, and in many cases destroyed, are set by outsiders - Settlers, who are almost entirely blind to the most important meanings that are attached to the beings, events, places, and objects that make up that heritage. A fragment of stone that was once (and still is) the blood of a god is not just a rock - it is more like a holy relic. And if the system that has been set up to manage those relics cannot even see that, then is never going to justly represent the interests and aspirations of Indigenous peoples.

Ben Rodgers

NABCEP Certified Solar PV Installation Professional at UGE International

2 年

I miss when you were chair of the OAS and I could look forward to your writings like this on a regular basis.

回复
Richard Herbert

Indigenous Capacity and Consultation

2 年

3/3 ...cont The reason a loon can be "brother loon" is because that loon is as much a child of our Creator as you are. There is much to learn once eyes open to truth and begin to see doctrinal lies. If you have started down this path, do not hesitate to connect with me. Richard

回复
Richard Herbert

Indigenous Capacity and Consultation

2 年

2/3 ... cont Religion and archaeology are both boxes with man-made doctrines supported by precepts used to interpret truth to fit doctrine rather than seek truth and change according to new understandings. Your post notes archaeology is used to assign cultural (not God-given) value to a find and then weight that value within a resource extraction-based classification system. Ultimately, the classification system your finds are placed into is used to devalue parts of creation and justify mining permits. Father cares deeply for all of his creation; land, water, plants, animals, fish, insects, man/woman and so on. With a lack of understanding of this creation truth, modern society has interpreted man’s place in creation as lord over creation, and other parts of creation as subjugated. Small wonder environments on this planet are being destroyed when one part of creation does not respect another part of creation – both of which are precious parts of Creator (Father). It is hard to see a rock as anything but a rock or door stop when the person looking at that rock is disconnected from their own place in creation; and as a consequence, disconnected from that rock’s place in creation. ... cont

回复
Richard Herbert

Indigenous Capacity and Consultation

2 年

1/3 Paul, I read you post, Tawiskaron (flint) on northern Ontario. I have been to 8 of 9 Matawa communities in that region. I understand desire behind your post to be sharing of a new awareness of flaws within doctrine you have been taught to follow. I do not see that flaw clearly revealed, as such I will explain what I understood in your writing. - The value of a rock or site is not appropriately measured by non-Indigenous archaeological and heritage precepts. Further, provincially-determined benchmarks exclude cultural value to the extent provincial officials are destroying culturally important sites. - I understand your reliance on culture and heritage explanations within your post as a partial understanding of a new awareness. In that, I note a missing truth. That is, we are surrounded by creation containing created items. All created items are made from God [whom I know as Father] and, for lack of another way to explain, are parts of Father. In creation, Father does not treasure one of his creations, parts, over another with favouritism. ... cont.

回复
Kevin Restoule

Government Relations Coordinator at the Anishinabek Nation

2 年

Well said Paul. You have a very good grasp of this and it sounds like that didn't happen by accident. It's quite apparent that you spent a lot of time thinking about this. One of the strengths of Indigenous culture and spirituality is the fact that it is not an organized religion. It is solely dependent upon the individual, their genuine truthfulness to themselves, and their Creator. There is no intermediary. No one to judge or absolve on behalf of the Creator, such as going to a priest for confession. Indigenous spirituality is a deeply personal connection to one's belief and does not demand that you be surrounded by those of the same belief. As Onaubinisay teaches, "Everyone, and there are no exceptions to this, everyone is entitled to feel good about themselves." I am not meaning to look down on any other doctrine, as they all have great value, but as you and I have spoken of before, this is a very big gap to bridge. It seems that the most foundational concepts of Indigenous spirituality connecting and guiding every part of their life is such a foreign concept, such as our animal relations. Chi-miigwetch for your good words!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了