TAU (Transformation as Usual) is the new BAU (Business as Usual)
Jean Dieudonne
Strategic execution + PMO | ex-Deloitte & LEK consultant | MBA Northwestern-Kellogg
“Change is the only constant in life.”?Heraclitus, Greek Philosopher
The accelerating pace of change, increasing competitive pressure and global disruptive events (such as COVID19) are increasingly impacting BAU activities leading to the concept of TAU (Transformation as Usual).
It is not longer sufficient to just run the day to day operation well, there is an increasing??need to actively manage, monitor and optimise BAU activities. In addition, the increasing level of changes (in some cases transformative changes)?are putting pressure on BAU activities/team requiring tight collaboration and integration between Projects and BAU (during project delivery and transition to BAU).
Hence, the need for organisation to evolve from a BAU to TAU mindset and operating model to become more efficient/productive and embrace, support Project initiatives.
Change (and Innovation) is mostly driven by projects mostly sitting outside BAU operational functions/ teams. There is inherent?tension between BAU and Change, as Projects by definition are about driving change- challenging and changing the status-quo. The concept of TAU (vs BAU) is to minimise this tension and to ensure successful collaboration between BAU and Change (Project) teams- both working in tandem to drive and achieve the strategic?change agenda.
BAU is not as exciting ( often treated as overhead) as strategic projects but remain business critical to ensure that there is a business (to pay for the projects)
We can broadly categorise different types of BAU and Change work
Is it a project of BAU activity ?
Picture extract from article "How to define a project and balance it with run the business"
BAU Definition
The term “business as usual” [BAU] refers to day-day activities a business conduct to run and maintain its operations, those activities are routine, fixed, repetitive and on-going (no end point).?
In comparison, change activities are mostly Projects driven, time-bound, transient with a specific goal and delivering a unique product/service with a defined purpose and budget. BAU are inherently less risky vs Change activities. Projects have?Delivery Risk and potentially introduced new risk in the business once completed (once transitioned to BAU).
Business as usual work tends to get less scrutiny and oversight than Project change work, given their lower risk nature and not being linked to investment return target metrics. A company would not have ‘business case’ or investment return target for its Finance, or HR function as an example. However, Projects within the Finance or HR function would have had to pass a business case checkpoint process and demonstrate value creation (to gain funding approval)
The key is that BAU activities don’t drive large change (Projects do), they might drive small and incremental changes. Change activities can emerge from BAU (being close to customer and running of the operations). Projects are about changing the business (from a current sate to a future state). However, as discussed above, there is an increase demand/ask to BAU team to support change (Project) activities as well as pressure to become more cost efficient/more productive (whilst continuing to maintain the baseline reliability/performance).?
Noting that BAU teams also conduct and drive projects, albeit mostly smaller, less complex and more tactical in nature. The big, transformational projects would be picked up and driven by specialised project team with specific funding.
Example of BAU activities (repetitive activities that keep a company runningA)
Routine/repetitive
Small changes
Some BAU activities might be disrupted by unforeseen events (e.g cyber attacks, natural disasters…) that would divert BAU team towards fixing and managing those events (in some cases temporary Taskforce would be set up, often organised as a Project).
Increasingly, organisations are experiencing increase level of change across all operational functions that require a change of BAU team mindset to a TAU mindset - from running/maintaining the baseline to supporting change and becoming more efficient.
Why is it important to categorise activities between BAU and Project ?
There are a number differences between BAU and Project being :
Connecting Change program/projects to BAU
Change projects need/rely on BAU to be successful. Project delivery team should embed BAU resources, test/pilot deliverables within BAU functions and ensure smooth transition to BAU.
Embedding change into BAU is the key to achieving the objectives and desired change outcomes.
So BAU and Project Change activities are closely inter-linked (and intertwined)
“According to respondents, 20 percent of value loss occurs after implementation, once the initiatives have been fully executed. To mitigate this loss, the results suggest that embedding transformation disciplines into business-as-usual structures, processes, and systems can help—and that this is a more common practice among successful transformations”
Losing from day one: Why even successful transformations fall short,” McKinsey & Company, Michael Bucy, Bill Schaninger, Kate VanAkin, and Brooke Weddle.
BAU vs Project staff
BAU staff do the same job?consistent day in day out activities. BAU work is managed by functional teams with technical expertise, grouped together in a Division (e.g Finance team working in the Finance Department)
Change work is conducted by Project teams requiring specialised skills- Project Manager, Scheduler, Risk manager, Change Manager. Those are specialised team members versed in working on tasks with discrete start and end dates and with strong communication, stakeholders engagement and influencing skills
Therefore, there are different skills and expertise required for BAU vs Project based work and re-deploying BAU staff into project roles is often difficult -??requiring re-training to work in a new environment driven by??time, cost and delivery pressure.?
Using BAU staff for Project work enables the creation of TAU mindset. BAU staff??embedded from a period of time in projects acquire a better understanding of the need to improve, evolve and acquire project management skill-set as well as mindset to challenge the status-quo (once returning to their BAU function).
Managing BAU vs Project (Change) work
By definition (as explained), BAU work is repetitive and on-going within functional areas. However, they do have cross-functional dependencies and linkage to change activities.
It is important for a business to?manage BAU demand and performance and have visibility of Projects impact on BAU
Monitoring and Optimising BAU work
Whilst there are lot of articles and research on how to optimise Projects, there is relatively little information relating to managing and optimising BAU work (and corresponding success metrics)
At its core, BAU work is about meeting expected service levels (SLAs-service level agreement) and delivering consistent / high quality outputs. It is about generating stability and predictability in day to day operations. It is about maintaining the consistent and high level of day to day operational performance of the organisation (maintaining the baseline performance) through operational excellence.
There would an expectation of driving incremental improvement, however this is not always clearly unless target are set and staff are incentivise to do so. Hence, the need to move to a TAU mindset/operation to encourage incremental changes and improvements and track improvements above the baseline performance.
Tracking BAU performance through KPIs
Whilst Projects are tracked via Project Management success metrics (Time/Cost/Quality) and via OKRs, BAU performance is about tracking business health via KPIs along the following dimensions
It is ensuring performance levels remains withing baseline expected. It should incorporate KPIs relating to continuous improvement target to improve business health.
Optimising BAU implies driving productivity gain which would are likely requiring a Project to extract productivity gain- hence the close relationship/ interlink between BAU and Projects- investing in Projects that would create the system/process/operating model for BAU to harvest/extract.
It would also be important the mix types of BAU (Fix/Run/Maintain) and BAU cost to the organisation (quantum of resources allocated to BAU activities) to look at BAU cost from a benchmarking cost efficiency lens approach. For instance, how much is our Financial operational function is costing (as % of total expenses) vs peers in our industry.
Conclusion?
Organisation should not neglect managing and monitoring BAU activities work as BAU is the foundation of business success (and pay for Changes).??BAU needs to be actively managed and monitored to ensure (drive) continual predictability and efficiency.
Increasingly, BAU should be though as TAU due to increase level and pace of change pervading more and more operational functions requiring??organisation to pay more attention, and demand more (in terms of productivity/efficiency) from their BAU activities and BAU staff.?
RegTech Innovation at scale
1 年This is a great read and very glad to have stumbled across it. It helps me think about digital transformation in a more organised and structured way and seeing BAU as a subset of TAU ensures we don't don't diminish BAU, as you say, 'They pay for the projects'. Welcome more of your thoughts on a TAU-BAU maturity model if such an animal exists. Thank you!
Associate Director, Institutional Client Coverage, CBA
1 年Love your thought leadership piece Jean! BAU vs TAU maybe appear as two competing concepts, but they likely to have originated from the similar business problem and just different in scale and complexity of the final solution delivery. I agree with you that we should think in TAU but close the feedback loop with real world hypothesis testing. Rather than the startup mentality of "fail and fail fast", maybe one of my favourite agile quote links the concept of TAU to BAU -- "Think big, Start small, Learn fast"