Targeting, Flexibility, and Measurable Success: The Rise of CTV Over Linear TV

Jack Wagner ??

The advertising landscape is undergoing significant transformation, particularly in how brands allocate their budgets between connected TV (CTV) and traditional linear TV advertising. As consumer viewing habits shift, the balance of power between these two mediums is evolving. While linear TV remains a staple for mass-market reach, CTV’s growth is driven by its ability to offer advanced targeting, flexibility, and measurable results.

Defining Linear TV and CTV

Linear TV refers to traditional broadcast and cable television, where programming follows a set schedule. Viewers watch content in real-time or via DVR but have little control over when specific shows air. This form of advertising typically targets a broad audience, with ad slots sold during specific times or shows based on assumed viewership demographics.

In contrast, CTV encompasses any television content delivered via internet-connected devices, including smart TVs, streaming platforms like Roku, Hulu, and Amazon Fire TV, and gaming consoles. CTV allows users to watch content on demand, providing a more personalized experience. Advertisers can target specific audiences based on data collected from digital behaviors, making it a more granular and customizable option.

Reach and Audience Size: Linear TV’s Breadth vs. CTV’s Depth

Linear TV remains one of the most effective ways to reach a massive audience. Major live events like sports, award shows, and news broadcasts attract millions of viewers, making linear TV a valuable platform for advertisers looking for broad exposure. This "one-to-many" approach can be especially effective for big brands aiming for brand awareness or product launches, as it enables mass reach with high frequency.

However, the traditional audience for linear TV is declining as more viewers migrate to streaming platforms. Younger demographics, in particular, are "cutting the cord" in favor of on-demand and streaming services. CTV offers an increasingly compelling solution to reach these audiences who no longer rely on scheduled programming. CTV may not yet match the sheer scale of linear TV, but its growth trajectory is rapid, especially as internet infrastructure improves and consumers continue to prefer on-demand content.

Targeting Capabilities: Broad Versus Granular

One of the primary distinctions between linear TV and CTV advertising lies in targeting capabilities. Linear TV ads are generally aimed at large, broad demographics, such as men aged 18-49 watching a football game. These campaigns rely heavily on Nielsen ratings and other demographic data to estimate audience size and composition. While effective for brand awareness and reaching large audiences, this approach lacks precision.

In contrast, CTV offers more advanced targeting capabilities, akin to digital advertising. Since CTV operates through internet-connected devices, it allows advertisers to use first-party and third-party data for targeting specific user segments. This includes behavioral data, location, interests, and even past purchase behavior. For example, an advertiser on CTV can target a specific viewer profile, such as a 35-year-old female interested in fitness and health products, who lives in an urban area and has recently searched for yoga classes online.

This data-driven approach allows CTV to deliver personalized ads, improving relevance and engagement. Advertisers can tailor their messages based on who is watching, when they are watching, and what content they are consuming. Furthermore, programmatic ad buying—enabled by automated technologies—enhances CTV's precision and speed, allowing advertisers to bid in real-time for ad placements.

Flexibility: Static Schedules vs. On-Demand Fluidity

Linear TV advertising typically involves long lead times and is often locked into set schedules. Ad campaigns need to be planned well in advance, with little room for adjustment once the schedule is set. This limits flexibility, making it challenging for advertisers to react to market conditions or shift their messaging mid-campaign.

CTV, on the other hand, offers far greater flexibility. Campaigns can be adjusted in real-time based on performance metrics. Advertisers can easily shift their budget, change creatives, or modify targeting parameters based on evolving consumer behavior or market trends. This flexibility allows advertisers to optimize campaigns on the fly, improving effectiveness and ROI.

Moreover, CTV’s ability to serve ads on-demand means advertisers are no longer bound to traditional time slots. Ads can be delivered at any time, providing brands with greater control over when and how they engage with their audience. This is particularly beneficial for advertisers targeting niche or fragmented audiences.

Measurement and Attribution: TV Ratings vs. Digital Metrics

One of the most significant differences between CTV and linear TV advertising is how success is measured. Linear TV relies on traditional methods like Nielsen ratings to estimate viewership and audience demographics. However, this measurement is imprecise, often giving only a rough estimate of how many people watched a particular ad. This lack of granularity makes it difficult to attribute conversions directly to a specific TV ad.

CTV, on the other hand, operates in the realm of digital metrics. Advertisers can measure impressions, clicks, conversions, and even direct sales, offering more accountability for ad spend. With advanced analytics, CTV can provide real-time insights into campaign performance, showing which audiences are engaging with the ads, how many times an ad was viewed, and what actions followed the ad exposure.

CTV's data-driven nature enables more precise attribution, helping advertisers track the consumer journey from ad exposure to conversion. Brands can tie specific actions, such as website visits or purchases, back to individual CTV ad impressions, making it easier to calculate ROI.

Cost Efficiency: Upfronts vs. Dynamic Pricing

Linear TV advertising has traditionally operated on a fixed pricing model, with advertisers purchasing airtime during upfronts an annual event where networks sell ad inventory for the upcoming season. This model often requires large financial commitments, which can be risky if the audience doesn’t align with expectations.

In contrast, CTV employs more dynamic pricing, where advertisers can bid for ad inventory in real time through programmatic platforms. This auction-based model provides more flexibility, allowing advertisers to spend according to their budget and performance goals. Because CTV ads are delivered to highly specific audiences, it can be more cost-efficient than linear TV, which often involves paying for reach that may not align with the brand’s target demographic.

However, CTV ads can be more expensive on a per-impression basis due to the premium nature of targeted advertising. Yet, the increased precision and ability to measure results often make it more cost-effective in terms of return on ad spend (ROAS).

Challenges and Considerations: Fragmentation and Brand Safety

Despite its advantages, CTV is not without its challenges. One significant hurdle is the fragmentation of the ecosystem. With various streaming services, platforms, and devices, the CTV landscape can be difficult to navigate. Advertisers must coordinate campaigns across multiple platforms, each with its own ad standards and measurement criteria. Ensuring consistent reach and frequency across these platforms can be challenging, particularly when aiming to avoid ad fatigue for viewers.

Brand safety is another concern for CTV advertisers. Since CTV operates through internet-connected platforms, there is potential for ads to appear alongside inappropriate or non-brand-safe content. Advertisers need to work with partners that offer robust brand safety measures, including whitelisting, blacklisting, and third-party verification tools.

Conclusion: The Future of CTV and Linear TV Advertising

While linear TV remains a vital platform for reaching broad audiences, CTV is rapidly gaining ground due to its advanced targeting capabilities, flexibility, and measurable outcomes. The shift towards CTV is accelerating as more consumers embrace on-demand content, and brands look for more efficient ways to reach their audiences.

For advertisers, the key to success lies in understanding the strengths and limitations of both mediums and leveraging them strategically. A balanced approach that combines the mass reach of linear TV with the precision and accountability of CTV could be the optimal strategy for brands navigating this evolving advertising landscape.

Is TikTok’s Smart+ the Solution Advertisers Need, or Another AI Gamble?

TikTok has launched Smart+, an AI-powered tool designed to simplify advertising by helping brands at every stage, from generating creative materials to purchasing ad space. Smart+ automates targeting and optimization, allowing advertisers to input goals, budgets, and assets, while the AI ensures the right ad reaches the right audience at the perfect time. This follows similar tools from competitors like Meta and Google, reflecting the growing demand for AI in advertising. However, previous AI tools have faced criticism for inflating costs, and TikTok’s uncertain legal future in the US adds further risk to Smart+’s adoption.

What’s a computer’s favorite snack?

Microchips.

Why was the marketer great at poker?

Because they knew all about return on investment.

Why did the marketer go to therapy?

Because they had too many conversion issues.

Snapchat Elevates Ads with Sponsored Snaps and Local Engagement on Snap Map

Snap has introduced two new ad formats: Sponsored Snaps and Promoted Places on Snap Map. Sponsored Snaps allow brands, like launch partner Disney, to send full-screen vertical video ads directly to users' chat inboxes, encouraging engagement through call-to-action buttons or direct messaging. Meanwhile, Promoted Places lets brands like McDonald’s and Taco Bell highlight their locations on Snap Map, which is used by over 350 million people monthly, boosting local visibility and foot traffic. These innovations aim to enhance brand engagement in high-attention areas while maintaining a user-friendly, non-intrusive ad experience.

How FAST Channels Are Changing the Streaming Game for Major Brands

The rise of Free Ad-Supported Streaming TV (FAST) channels is transforming how brands engage with streaming audiences. Major companies like PepsiCo and Mattel are launching branded FAST channels, such as PepsiCo’s FLVR on FireTV and Mattel’s Barbie and Friends on Samsung TV Plus, to create direct connections with consumers. At the Ad Age Business of Brands conference, experts discussed the benefits of FAST, highlighting how brands can use curated and localized content to stand out in a crowded streaming landscape. With enhanced personalization and content discoverability, FAST channels are becoming a vital tool for brands seeking direct-to-consumer engagement.

Why Hawk Productions?

Creative Excellence:?Transforming ideas into visually stunning narratives.

Tailored Solutions:?Customized video content that aligns with your brand’s voice.

Cutting-Edge Technology:?Delivering high-quality content across all platforms.

Proven Results:?Videos that entertain, convert, and inspire.

Our Collaboration:?Our partnership with Hawk Productions allows us to offer comprehensive video production services, seamlessly integrated into our consulting solutions. Ready to create something great? Let’s connect and elevate your brand together.

Hawk Digital specializes in elevating brand visibility and engagement through cutting-edge digital media services. Our expertise spans Online, Mobile, and Connected TV (CTV) advertising, along with video production and strategic content creation. By leveraging the latest technologies, industry standards, and retail media strategies, we craft targeted advertising campaigns that deliver measurable results. Hawk is dedicated to helping brands and agencies maximize their reach and achieve successful attribution for their marketing objectives.

Google’s Future at Stake: DOJ Pushes for Search Market Reforms

In September 2023, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) accused Google of maintaining an illegal monopoly in the online search market, arguing that its dominance stifles competition. Google’s Android operating system, Chrome browser, and AdWords platform all funnel users into its search engine, solidifying its monopoly. As part of an antitrust lawsuit, a "remedies" phase is set for 2025, where potential outcomes include breaking up Google, forcing it to share search data with competitors, or ending agreements that make Google the default search engine on many devices. While Google plans to appeal, the case could reshape the tech landscape and set a precedent for other Big Tech companies facing antitrust scrutiny.

From Offline to Online: The Digital Evolution of Baby Boomers

The WARC Media report highlights a significant shift in Baby Boomers’ media habits, as this generation increasingly embraces digital platforms like connected TV, online press, and streaming services. Despite brands focusing heavily on younger audiences like Gen Z, Boomers—defined as those born between 1946 and 1964—are moving away from traditional media and spending more time online. However, they remain less engaged with social media compared to younger generations and are the least receptive to advertising, with only 12% feeling positive about ads. Brands are encouraged to rethink their digital strategies to better cater to this affluent but often overlooked demographic.