Tanking For Draft Pick Is A Myth
Leigh Steinberg
Chm of Bd at Steinberg Sports and Entertainment & Founder of The Leigh Steinberg Foundation
Every year in professional sports, the worst performing teams stir up speculation that they are somehow purposely attempting to lose or "tank" games in order to be in position to have the first pick in the following year's draft which will yield a franchise altering athlete. This year in the NFL, the Jets (2-14) and the Jaguars (1-15) triggered conversation as to whether they were losing games to be in position to select wunderkind Clemson QB Trevor Lawrence. This hoary myth deserves to be filed with the other baseless conspiracy theories plaguing this country. Having represented professional athletes for 47 years, this scenario is clearly an impossibility.
The very nature of talented athletes is to be competitive. It runs completely against their ethos and training to lose at anything. A top athlete would try to beat you at tiddlywinks. Their performance in each game is being evaluated for playing time, potential contract negotiations or free agency implications and is put on tape that never goes away. In most sports, athletes are continually competing for the size of future contracts. They may have contracts that have incentive clauses that will accrue more money based on success on the field and reaching certain statistical benchmarks. The concept of an athlete that has a finite playing life, shading his or her performance for the benefit of a future draft pick hasn't been a reality since the " Black Sox" baseball scandal when athletes took bribes. They were paid so little in those days, they needed second jobs.
In taking this theory to the coaching ranks, imagine a coach living in a hypercompetitive bubble during the season advocating for altering a game plan or starting a less competitive player or doing anything to insure a losing result. This runs counter to that coach's competitive and career preservation instincts.
So that leaves a team owner who might care more about the future of a franchise than winning an individual game. Even if he or she had the power and suasion to force the front office, coaching staff, and players to go along with losing, any obvious attempt would bring scrutiny from the press, fellow franchise owners and other leagues. An owner might lose their franchise for such a provable offense.
What distinguishes a competitive sport from a sports such as wrestling is the shared confidence that games are played on an even playing field - same rules, conditions, officials, and athletes competing at the highest level. Any inference that the games might somehow be fixed would destroy a sport and move it to the realm of carnival.
Lastly, no one can precisely prognosticate the future. Lawrence will probably turn out to be a game changer for Jacksonville. It is difficult to make the playoffs and the Super Bowl without a franchise quarterback. If the Jets stick with QB Sam Darnold and trade down to bundle high draft picks, and use them wisely, then Darnold may flourish with a supporting cast and bring happiness to long suffering Jet fans.
Writer/Producer/Multi-Platform Creative Content Creator
4 年As a former “Athlete” , I can’t imagine “tanking “..but yes it happens..and frankly more often then one would think for a myriad of reasons..none the less, one can not over state the obvious..a good read.,tnx Leigh
Organizational and Business development consultant who ROCKS THE HOUSE!!
4 年As a Retired Educational Administrator and Athletic Director I would hope losing on purpose was not a practice and it is surely unacceptable. What I do like is seeing all of the practice squad players have a chance to perform and they did. It is rare that more players have opportunities to participate in a sport they love and find success. It is great to see some of the teams employ athletes who's only chance to play was a dream come true. I believe we need to see more of these opportunities for and Coaches should look to recruit for these athletes. It is great to see some of the undrafted making successful conversions and contributions to their professional teams. This year more than most the athletes who many thought would not have a chance proved them wrong. The underdog is what I hope we never stop believing in.
Hi Leigh Steinberg, while I agree the players on the court or field, NEVER tank its the team that is on the field that often isn't the best team. So I disagree this is a MYTH and in fact is rooted in historical facts. Sam Hinkie announced in public what he was doing, he didnt hide it. No one can argue that the Sixers Process was about losing to getting higher draft picks, and he specifically put a less talented team on the court that had limited experience. Example 2, just last night when the Eagles pulled Jalen for Nate Sudfeld who hasnt played in a game all year. The The Eagles say they wanted to see what Sudfeld can do before they go into the offseason. 100% he did not give the team a better chance to win the game. The difference between the 6 and 9 slot is valuable and winning or losing that game didnt not matter. Its no different then sitting veterans as the goal in week 17 for teams not making the playoffs is to give player experience and not to win the game. The players on the field are absolutely trying their best to win you are right there. But they 100% did not have their best QB to win the game on the field. As an Eagles fan Im fine with that as I know the value of 6 vs 9.
Retired
4 年What are your thoughts on the Phil Eagles display last night? (1-03-21) Pulling starting QB for someone who has not played a down all year? Down by less the a TD? The Eagles got a better position in the draft as a result...And stuck it to the Giants in the process.
I help athlete entrepreneurs plan for life after sport by leveraging high-performance corporate expertise | DM ‘BETA’ to get started!
4 年Interesting observation, Leigh Steinberg. The competitive nature of professional sports makes tanking for draft picks very much “thinkable”. Whether anyone loses on purpose though very much debatable. Personally I do not think teams lose on purpose although I do not think it is unthinkable either...